Reification is a concept of critical theory that denotes certain problematic, habitualised forms of objectification. In this article, I examine whether the concept can be applied in environmental philosophy and what value it has for environmental critical theory. I begin by introducing the concept and the two senses in which reification of the non-human world has been discussed in the literature: first, denoting the misrecognition of others’ attitudes towards the natural world; and second, denoting a misconceived relationship between humans and their environment. After this, I introduce two potentially new subjects of reification: non-human animals and non-human nature. I also discuss two phenomena that could count as reification: industrial meat production and the commodification of ecological systems.
AdamsC.J.2015. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory, rev. edn. London: Bloomsbury.
2.
AdornoT. W.2006 [2001]. History and Freedom. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3.
BiroA.2016. ‘Human nature, non-human nature, and needs: environmental political theory and critical theory’. In GabrielsonT., HallC., MeyerJ.M. and SchlosbergD. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory, pp. 89–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
ButlerJ.2008. ‘Taking another's view: ambivalent implications’. In HonnethA., Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, pp. 97–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
CavalieriP.2005. ‘The animal debate: a reexamination’. In SingerP., (ed.) In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave, pp. 54–68. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6.
CoralieC., GuillaumeO. and ClaudeN.. 2015. ‘Tracking the origins and development of biodiversity offsetting in academic research and its implications for conservation: a review’. Biological Conservation192: 492–503. Crossref.
7.
DempseyJ. and SuarezD.C.. 2016. ‘Arrested development? The promises and paradoxes of “selling nature to save it”’. Annals of the American Association of Geographers106: 653–671.
8.
FeenbergA.2015. ‘Lukács's theory of reification and contemporary social movements’. Rethinking Marxism27: 490–507. Crossref.
9.
HailwoodS.2015. Alienation and Nature in Environmental Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
HarfeldJ., CornouC., KornumA. and GjerrisM.. 2016. ‘Seeing the animal: on the ethical implications of de-animalization in intensive animal production systems’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics29: 407–423. Crossref.
11.
HaywardT.1997. ‘Anthropocentrism: a misunderstood problem’. Environmental Values6: 49–63. Crossref.
12.
HegelG.W.F.1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. WoodA.W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
HeydT. (ed.). 2005. Recognizing the Autonomy of Nature: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
HonnethA.2008. Reification. A New Look at an Old Idea, ed. JayM.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
HorkheimerM.1947. Eclipse of Reason. New York: Continuum.
16.
HullG.2013. ‘Reification and social criticism’. Philosophical Papers42: 49–77. Crossref.
JüttenT.2010. ‘What is reification? A critique of Axel Honneth’. Inquiry53: 235–256. Crossref.
20.
LightA., and HiggsE.S.. 1996. ‘The politics of ecological restoration’. Environmental Ethics18: 227–247. Crossref.
21.
LivermanD.2004. ‘Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers94: 734–738.
22.
LukácsG.1971 [1923]. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, trans. LivingstoneR.. London: Merlin Press.
23.
McAfeeK.1999. ‘Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmental-ism’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17: 133–154. Crossref.
24.
McKenneyB.A., and KieseckerJ.M.. 2010. ‘Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks’. Environmental Management45: 165–176. Crossref.
25.
MarcuseH.1964. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
26.
MeyerJ.M.2005. ‘Global liberalism, environmentalism and the changing boundaries of the political: Karl Polanyi's insights’. In PaavolaJ. and LoweI. (eds), Environmental Values in a Globalising World: Nature, Justice and Governance, pp. 83–101. London: Routledge.
27.
NussbaumM.1995. ‘Objectification’. Philosophy and Public Affairs24: 249–291. Crossref.
28.
PachiratT.2011. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight. New Haven: Yale University Press.
29.
PitkinH.1987. ‘Rethinking reification’. Theory and Society16: 263–293. Crossref.
30.
PolanyiK.2001 [1944]. The Great Transformation, 2nd edn. Boston: Beacon Press.
31.
SchlosbergD.2007. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
SingerP. (ed.). 2005. In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
33.
TestaI.2015. ‘Ontology of the false state’. Journal of Social Ontology1: 271–300. Crossref.
34.
ThompsonM.J.2017. ‘Collective intentionality, social domination, and reification’. Journal of Social Ontology3: 207–229. Crossref.
35.
VatnA.2000. ‘The environment as a commodity’. Environmental Values9: 493–509. Crossref.
36.
VogelS.2015. Thinking Like a Mall: Environmental Philosophy after the End of Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
VogelS.2016. “‘Nature” and the (built) environment’. In GabrielsonT., HallC., MeyerJ.M. and SchlosbergD. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory, pp. 149–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
