In this article I shall propose María Zambrano's poetic reason as a suitable method for developing a knowledge of animal being. To do so, I will follow the analyses (Derrida, Coetzee) that place animal thinking in the poetic sphere, thus showing the need for a poetic/literary knowledge to make a philosophical knowledge of the animal possible. Animal writing expresses our nature in relation to animal nature; it discloses our animal interbeingness. Finally, I will point to some of the principles of ecofeminist/animal ethics, like care and empathy, which arise both in what I propose to call animal writing and in Zambranian poetic reason.
Acevedo GuerraJ.2008. ‘La razón poética. Una aproximación (María Zambrano y Heidegger)’. Aurora: papeles del Seminario María Zambrano9: 6–14.
2.
AdánO.1999. ‘María Zambrano y la pregunta por el 'ser”. Aurora: papeles del Seminario María Zambrano1: 59–79.
3.
AdamsC.J. and DonovanJ. (eds). 1995. Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
4.
AdamsC.J. and GruenL. (eds). 2014. Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth. New York and London: Bloomsbury.
5.
BalzaI.2000. Tiempo y escritura en María Zambrano. Donostia: Iralka.
6.
BalzaI.2012. ‘La escritura filosófica como método de conocimiento: Zambrano, Descartes y Bernhard’. Escritura e Imagen8: 193–208. Crossref.
7.
BalzaI.2014. ‘Los vacíos de un texto: hacia la razón poética de María Zambrano’. Cuadernos del Ateneo de La Laguna32: 40–54.
8.
CacciariM.2003. ‘Para una investigación sobre la relación entre Zambrano y Heidegger’. Archipiélago: Cuadernos de crítica de la cultura59: 47–52.
9.
CalarcoM.2008. Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
CoetzeeJ.M.1999. The Lives of Animals. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
11.
DerridaJ.2006. The Animal That Therefore I Am. Translated by WillsDavid. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.
12.
DillardA.2007 (1974). Pilgrim at Tinker Creek. New York: HarperCollins.
13.
DonovanJ.2016. The Aesthetics of Care: On the Literary Treatment of Animals. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
14.
DonovanJ.1990. ‘Animal rights and feminist theory’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society15 (2): 350–375. Crossref.
15.
DonovanJ. and AdamsC.J. (eds). 2007. The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics: a Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
FowlesJ.2010 (1979). The Tree. Ecco.
17.
GaglianoM.2017. ‘Breaking the silence: green mudras and the faculty of language in plants’. In GaglianoM., RyanJ.C. and VieiraP. (eds), The Language of Plants: Science, Philosophy, Literature, pp. 84–100. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
GruenL.2015. Entangled Empathy. An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals. New York: Lantern Books.
19.
HugganG. and TiffinH.. 2010. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. London and New York: Routledge.
20.
KemmererL. (ed.). 2011. Sister Species. Woman, Animals and Social Justice. University of Illinois Press.
21.
LevertovD.1961. The Jacob's Ladder. New Directions.
22.
MalamudR.2003. Poetic Animals and Animal Soul. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
ManesC.1996. ‘Nature and silence’. In GlotfeltyC. and FrommH. (eds), The Ecocriticism Reader. Landmarks in Literary Ecology, pp. 15–29. Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press.
24.
McFarlandS.E.2008. ‘Wild women: literary explorations of American landscapes’. In CookB.J., (ed.) Women Writing Nature. A Feminist View, pp. 41–55. New York: Lexington Books.
MoeA.M.2014. Zoopoetics: Animals and the Making of Poetry. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
27.
PlumwoodV.2002. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. New York: Routledge.
28.
RigbyK.2006. ‘Writing after nature’. Australian Humanities Review39–40.
29.
RuddickS.1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. New York: Ballantine.
30.
ScholtmeijerM.1995. ‘The power of otherness: animals in women's fiction’. In AdamsC.J. and DonovanJ. (eds), Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations, pp. 231–262. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
31.
ThoreauH.D.1985 (1854). Walden, or, Life in the Woods. Literary Classics of the US Reprint.
32.
VanceL.1995. ‘Beyond just-so stories: narrative, animals, and ethics’. In AdamsC.J. and DonovanJ. (eds), Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations, pp. 163–191. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
33.
VieiraP.2015. ‘Phytographia: literature as plant writing’. Environmental Philosophy12 (2): 205–220. Crossref.
34.
WarrenC.2010. Annie Dillard and the Word Made Flesh. An Incarnational Theory of Language. Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press.
35.
WheelerW.2006. The Whole Creature. Complexity, Biosemiotics and the Evolution of Culture. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
