The idea of dignity is often taken to be a foundation for principles of justice and democracy. In the West it has numerous formulations and conceptualisations. Within the capabilities approach to justice theorists have expanded the concept of dignity to encompass animals and ecological communities. In this article I rework the idea of dignity to include the Māori philosophical concepts of mauri, tapu and mana – something I argue is necessary if the capabilities approach is to decolonise in the Aotearoa context. Furthermore, the article links the nation's recognition of three extensive geographical regions – Te Awa Tupua, Te Urewera and Mt Taranaki – as legal persons to Mātauranga Māori and nonhuman dignity. In doing so, I identify the potential that this understanding of dignity and these legal moves have to decolonise democracy within the settler state.
Bendik-KeymerJ.2014. ‘From humans to all of life’. In ComimF. and NussbaumM.C. (eds), Capabilities, Gender, Equality, pp. 175–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BennettJ.2004. ‘The force of things’. Political Theory32(3): 347–372. Crossref.
7.
Bird RoseD.2012. ‘Why I don't speak of wilderness’. EarthSong (Spring): 9–11.
8.
CharmanK.2008. ‘Ecuador first to grant nature constitutional rights’. Capitalism Nature Socialism19(4): 131–133. Crossref.
9.
CoulthardG.2014. Red Skin White Masks. Minneapolis, MA: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
DurieM.2010. ‘Outstanding universal value: How relevant is indigeneity?’ In SelbyR., MooreP. and MulhollandM. (eds), Māori and the Environment, pp. 239–249. Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand: Huia Publishers.
11.
FulferK.2013. ‘The capabilities approach to justice and the flourishing of nonsentient life’. Ethics and Environment18(1): 19–42. Crossref.
12.
HenareM.2001. ‘Tapu, Mana, Mauri, Hau, Wairua’. In GrimJ.A., (ed.) Indigenous Traditions and Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
KantImmanuel. 1988. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
KatebG.2011. Human Dignity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum WichertR. and NussbaumM.C.. 2017. ‘Scientific whaling? The scientific research exception and the future of the international whaling commission’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: a Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centred Development18(3): 356–369. Crossref.
22.
NussbaumM.C.2000. Women and Human Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
NussbaumM.C.2004. ‘Beyond “compassion and humanity”’. In SunsteinC.R. and NussbaumM.C. (eds), Animal Rights, pp. 299–320. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
NussbaumM.C.2006. ‘The moral status of animals’. Chronicle of Higher Education52(22): B6–B8–1–7.
25.
NussbaumM.C.2007. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
26.
NussbaumM.C.2011. Creating Capabilities: A Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
RawlsJ.2009 [1971]. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
29.
RobertsM., HaamiB., BentonR.A., SatterfieldT., FinucaneM.L. and HenareM.. 2004. ‘Whakapapa as a Maori mental construct: Some implications for the debate over genetic modification of organisms’. The Contemporary Pacific16(1): 1–28. Crossref.
30.
RosenM.2012. Dignity. Harvard University Press.
31.
SchachterO.1983. ‘Human dignity as a normative concept’. The American Journal of International Law77(4): 848–854. Crossref.
32.
SchlosbergD.2012a. ‘Climate justice and capabilities: A framework for adaptation policy’. Ethics and International Affairs26(4): 445–461. Crossref.
33.
SchlosbergD.2012b. ‘Justice, ecological integrity, and climate change’. In ThompsonA. and Bendik-KeymerJ. (eds), Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change: Human Virtues of the Future, pp. 165–183. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34.
SchlosbergD.2013. ‘Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse’. Environmental Politics22(1): 37–55. Crossref.
35.
SchlosbergD.2014. ‘Ecological justice for the Anthropocene’. In WissenburgM. and SchlosbergD. (eds), Political Animals and Animal Politics, pp. 75–89. London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan. Crossref.
36.
SchlosbergD. and CarruthersD.. 2010. ‘Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities’. Global Environmental Politics10(4): 12–35. Crossref.
37.
SchroederD.2010. ‘Dignity: one, two, three, four, five, still counting’. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics19(1): 118–125. Crossref.
38.
SchroederD. and Bani-SadrA.H.. 2017. Dignity in the 21st Century. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Crossref.
39.
ShirresM.P.1982. ‘Tapu’. The Journal of the Polynesian Society91(1): 29–51. Retrieved on 1 October 2018 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20705620.
40.
StoneC.D.1972. ‘Should trees have standing – toward legal rights for natural objects’. Southern California Law Review45(450): 450–501. Crossref.
41.
TanasescuM.2013. ‘The rights of nature in Ecuador: The making of an idea’. International Journal of Environmental Studies70(6): 846–861. Crossref.
42.
TanasescuM.2014. ‘Rethinking representation: The challenge of non-humans’. Australian Journal of Political Science49(1): 40–53. Crossref.
43.
TanasescuM.2015. ‘Nature advocacy and the indigenous symbol’. Environmental Values24(1): 105–122. Crossref.
44.
United Nations General Assembly. (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
45.
VogelS.2006. ‘The silence of nature’. Environmental Values15(2): 145–171. Crossref.
46.
WaldronJ.2012. Dignity, Rank, and Rights (ed. Dan-CohenM.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
47.
WateneK.2016. ‘Valuing nature: Māori philosophy and the capability approach’. Oxford Development Studies44(3): 287–296. Crossref.
48.
WhyteK.P.2017. ‘Is it colonial déjà vu?’ In AdamsonJ. and DavisM. (eds), Humanities for the Environment, pp. 88–105. London and New York: Earthscan.
49.
WilliamsD.2001. Mātauranga Maori and Taonga. Wellington, New Zealand: Waitangi Tribunal.
