A Duty to Cognitively Enhance Animals

Abstract

In this article I argue that humans have a pro tanto duty to cognitively enhance some animals threatened with extinction. I will use as a case study a particular set of animals: smaller Australian marsupials. Many of these animals are on the brink of extinction thanks to the introduction of the fox and the domestic cat to the continent of Australia. Ecologists conjecture that these marsupials do not have the behavioural flexibility to cope with these introduced predators. By introducing predators, humans performed a wrong action because it led to the extinction of species and continues to threaten many marsupials species such as woylies, Gilbert's potoroos, numbats and mountain pygmy possums. This wrong action gives rise to an obligation to intervene to prevent further species loss. Traditional means of conservation do not seem sufficient to address this obligation; therefore, there is a duty to cognitively enhance these creatures as soon as the technology is sufficiently researched and safe.

Keywords

Cognitive enhancement conservation species extinction intrinsic value genetic engineering

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

2001. ‘The bilby Macrotis lagotis (Marsupialia: Peramelidae) in south-western Australia: Original range limits, subsequent decline, and presumed regional extinction’. Records of the Western Australian Museum 20: 271–305.

AISC (Australian Invasive Species Council). 2013. ‘1080 and animal welfare: a complicated equation’. Available at: https://invasives.org.au/blog/1080-and-animal-welfare-a-complicated-equation/ (accessed 2 February 2017).

Anthes

2013. Frankenstein's Cat: Cuddling Up to Biotech's Brave New Beasts. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Biello

2010. ‘How to restore the Florida panther: Add a little Texas cougar’. Scientific American, 24 September. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/florida-panther-restoration/ (accessed 20 August 2016).

Bostrom

, and Sandberg

. 2009. ‘Cognitive enhancement: Methods, ethics, regulatory challenges’. Science and Engineering Ethics 15: 311–341. Crossref.

Bradley

2013. ‘Why leave nature alone?’ In Hiller

, Kahn

and Ilea

(eds), Consequentialism and Environmental Ethics, pp. 92–106. New York: Routledge.

Buchanan

2011. Better than Human: The Promises and Perils of Enhancing Ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Callicott

J.B.

1986. ‘On the intrinsic value of nonhuman species’. In Norton

, (ed.) The Preservation of Species, pp. 138–172. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Callicott

J. B.

1988. ‘Animal liberation and environmental ethics: Back together again’. Between the Species 4: 163–169. Crossref.

10.

Chan

2009. ‘Should we enhance animals?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 678–683. Crossref.

11.

Davis

2009. Invasion Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Davis

N.E.

, Forsyth

D.M.

, Triggs

, Pascoe

, Benshemesh

, Robley

, Lawrence

, Ritchie

E.G.

, Nimmo

D.G.

and Lumsden

L.F.

. 2015. ‘Interspecific and geographic variation in the diets of sympatric carnivores: Dingoes/wild dogs and red foxes in south-eastern Australia’. PLOS One 10(3): e0120975. Crossref.

13.

DEE (Department of Environment and Energy, Australian Government). 2016. ‘EPBC Act list of threatened fauna’. Available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicthreatenedlist.pl#mammals_endangered (accessed 20 August 2016).

14.

DeLong

D.C.

1996. ‘Defining biodiversity’. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24: 738–749.

15.

Denny

E.A.

, and Dickman

C.R.

. 2010. ‘Review of cat ecology and management strategies in Australia’. Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Dickman/publication/305409721_Review_of_Cat_Ecology_and_Management_Strategies_in_Australia/links/578e21bd08ae81b4466eb7a9.pdf (accessed 2 February 2017).

16.

Doherty

T.S.

, Davis

R.A.

, Etten

E.J.

, Algar

, Collier

, Dickman

C.R.

, Edwards

, Masters

, Palmer

and Robinson

. 2015. ‘A continental-scale analysis of feral cat diet in Australia’. Journal of Biogeography 42: 964–975. Crossref.

17.

Esvelt

K.M.

, Smidler

A.L.

, Catteruccia

and Church

G.M.

. 2014. ‘Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations’. Elife 3: e03401. Crossref.

18.

Farnsworth

2015. ‘The condor question revisited’. Minding Nature 8: 31–36.

19.

Flannery

2002. The Future Eaters: An Ecological History of the Australasian Lands and People. New York: Grove Press.

20.

Ghilarov

A.M.

2000. ‘Ecosystem functioning and intrinsic value of biodiversity’. Oikos 90: 408–412. Crossref.

21.

Griffin

A.S.

, Blumstein

D.T.

and Evans

C.S.

. 2000. ‘Training captive-bred or translocated animals to avoid predators’. Conservation Biology 14: 1317–1326.

22.

Han

, Chen

, Wang

, Windrem

, Wang

, Shanz

, Xu

, Oberheim

N.A.

, Bekar

, Betstadt

and Silva

A.J.

. 2013. ‘Forebrain engraftment by human glial progenitor cells enhances synaptic plasticity and learning in adult mice’. Cell Stem Cell 12: 342–353. Crossref.

23.

Hettinger

2014. ‘Valuing naturalness in the “Anthropocene”: Now more than ever’. In Wuerthner

, Crist

and Butler

(eds), Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth, pp. 174–179. Washington: Island Press. Crossref.

24.

IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature). 2016. ‘IUCN red list of threatened species’, version 2016–1. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 20 August 2016).

25.

Johnson

, and Stinchcombe

. 2007. ‘An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology’. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 250–257. Crossref.

26.

Kareiva

, and Marvier

. 2011. Conservation Science: Balancing the Needs of People and Nature. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company.

27.

Katz

2003. ‘The big lie: Human restoration of nature’. In Light

and Rolston

(eds), Environmental Ethics, pp. 390–397. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

28.

McLean

I.G.

, Holzer

and Studholme

B.J.S.

. 1999. ‘Teaching predator-recognition to a naive bird: Implications for management’. Biological Conservation 87: 123–130. Crossref.

29.

McLean

I.G.

, Lundie-Jenkins

and Jarman

P.J.

. 1996. ‘Teaching an endangered mammal to recognise predators’. Biological Conservation 75: 51–62. Crossref.

30.

McLean

I.G.

, Schmitt

N.T.

, Jarman

P.J.

, Duncan

and Wynne

C.D.L.

. 2000. ‘Learning for life: Training marsupials to recognise introduced predators’. Behaviour 137: 1361–1376. Crossref.

31.

Marris

2011. Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World. New York: Bloomsbury.

32.

Marris

2017. ‘Cut and paste conservation’. Santa Clara Magazine, 1 March. Available at: https://magazine.scu.edu/scm/spring2017/features.cfm?b=439&c=24021 (accessed 7 December 2017).

33.

O'Donnell

, Webb

J.K.

and Shine

. 2010. ‘Conditioned taste aversion enhances the survival of an endangered predator imperilled by a toxic invader’. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 558–565. Crossref.

34.

O'Neill

2006. ‘The varieties of intrinsic value’. In Light

and Rolston

(eds), Environmental Ethics, pp. 131–142. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

35.

Ortiz

S.E.G.

2004. ‘Beyond welfare: Animal integrity, animal dignity, and genetic engineering’. Ethics and the Environment 9: 94–120. Crossref.

36.

Palmer

2010. Animal Ethics in Context. New York: Columbia University Press.

37.

Palmer

2012. ‘Can and should we make reparation to nature?’ In Kabasenche

W.P.

, O'Rourke

and Slater

(eds), The Environment: Philosophy, Science, Ethics, pp. 201–222. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

38.

Persson

, and Savulescu

. 2012. Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

39.

Regan

1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

40.

Roelke

, and O'Brien

. 1993. ‘The consequences of demographic reduction and genetic depletion in the endangered Florida panther’. Current Biology 3: 340–350. Crossref.

41.

Rohwer

, and Marris

. 2015. ‘Is there a prima facie duty to preserve genetic integrity in conservation biology?’ Ethics, Policy and Environment 18(3): 233–247.

42.

Rolston

III

1985. ‘Duties to endangered species’. BioScience 35: 718–726. Crossref.

43.

Sagoff

1984. ‘Animal liberation and environmental ethics: Bad marriage, quick divorce’. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 22: 297–307. Crossref.

44.

Sandel

2007. The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

45.

Singer

1995. Animal Liberation. New York: Random House.

46.

Soulé

M.E.

1985. ‘What is conservation biology? A new synthetic discipline addresses the dynamics and problems of perturbed species, communities, and ecosystems’. BioScience 35: 727–734.

47.

Streiffer

and Basl

. 2013. ‘The Ethics of Engineering Animals for Agriculture’ In Sandler

(ed.), Ethics and Emerging Technologies, pp. 501–515. Palgrave-Macmillan.

48.

Vucetich

J.A.

, Bruskotter

J.T.

and Nelson

M.P.

. 2015. ‘Evaluating whether nature's intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation’. Conservation Biology 29: 321–332. Crossref.

49.

Wallach

A.D.

, Bekoff

, Nelson

M.P.

and Ramp

. 2015. ‘Promoting predators and compassionate conservation’. Conservation Biology 29: 1481–1484. Crossref.

50.

Warren

M.A.

1997. Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

51.

Winnard

, and Coulson

. 2008. ‘Sixteen years of eastern barred bandicoot Perameles gunnii reintroductions in Victoria: A review’. Pacific Conservation Biology 14: 34–53. Crossref.

52.

Zuolo

2016. ‘Dignity and animals: Does it make sense to apply the concept of dignity to all sentient beings?’ Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19: 1117–1130. Crossref.