On 25 September 2015, the seventieth session of the General Assembly in the United Nations approved new Sustainable Development Goals building upon the vision of the original Millennium Development Goals. I argue that this post-2015 agenda still neglects fundamental qualities of cultural sovereignty that are key to maintaining sustainable practices, values and lifestyle habits. No single goal emphasises the need to protect local ecological knowledge, cultural heritage and alternative economic practices – nor their interrelation with biodiversity – as a pathway to sustainability. The factors that threaten sustainable lifestyles remain a conspicuous absence in the goals. The article presents a thought experiment to provoke the addition of the ‘inextricable link’ of biological, cultural and linguistic diversity to the Sustainable Development Goals: the recognition and affirmation of biocultural heritage.
AgyemanJ.2005. Sustainable Communities and the Challenge of Environmental Justice. New York: New York University Press.
2.
AnderssonE., TengöaM.McPhearsonT. and KremerP.. 2015. ‘Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability’. Ecosystem Services12: 165–168. Crossref.
ArgumedoA., and PimbertM.. 2008. ‘Protecting farmers' rights with indigenous bio-cultural heritage territories: The experience of the potato park’, report. International Institute for Environment and Development. Available at: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G03072.pdf (accessed 9 July 2017).
5.
ArgumedoA., . 2011. ‘Implementing farmers’ rights under the FAO international treaty on PGRFA: The need for a broad approach based on biocultural heritage’, paper prepared for the ‘Meeting of the Fourth Governing Body of the International Treaty on PGRFA’, Bali, 14–18 March 2011. Available at: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/farmers_rights_paper_bali_draft5.pdf (accessed 9 July 2017).
6.
BerkesF., ColdingJ. and FolkeC.. 2000. ‘Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management’. Ecological Applications10(5): 1251–1262. Crossref.
7.
BurfordG., . 2013. ‘Bringing the “missing pillar” into sustainable development goals: Towards intersubjective values-based indicators’. Sustainability5(7): 3035–3059. Crossref.
CarpenterS.R., . 2009. ‘Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(5): 1305–1312. Crossref.
10.
CocksM.2006. ‘Biocultural diversity: Moving beyond the realm of “indigenous” and “local” people.’ Human Ecology34(2): 185–200. Crossref.
11.
CostanzaR., . 2014. ‘Changes in the global value of ecosystem services’. Global Environmental Change26: 152–158. Crossref.
12.
Davidson-HuntI.J., . 2012. ‘Biocultural design: A new conceptual framework for sustainable development in rural indigenous and local communities’. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society5(2). Available at: https://sapiens.revues.org/1382 (accessed 15 September 2017).
13.
DíazS., . 2015. ‘The IPBES conceptual framework – connecting nature and people’. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability14: 1–16. Crossref.
14.
DusselE.2013. Ethics of Liberation in the Age of Globalization and Exclusion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
DuxburyN., . 2012. ‘Cities, culture and sustainable development’. In AnheierH. and IsarY.R. (eds), Cities, Cultural Policy and Governance, pp. 73–86. London: Sage Publications.
16.
EscobarA.2011. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17.
FehlingM., NelsonB.D. and VenkatapuramS.. 2013. ‘Limitations of the Millennium Development Goals: A literature review’. Global Public Health8(10): 1109–1122. Crossref.
18.
FishR., ChurchA. and WinterM.. 2016. ‘Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement’. Ecosystem Services21(B): 208–217. Crossref.
19.
GavinM.C., . 2015. ‘Defining biocultural approaches to conservation’. Trends in Ecology and Evolution30(3): 140–145. Crossref.
20.
GrearA.2015. ‘The discourse of “biocultural” rights and the search for new epis-temic parameters: Moving beyond essentialisms and old certainties in an age of anthropocene complexity?’ Journal of Human Rights and the Environment6(1): 1–6. Crossref.
21.
HulmeM., and BorieM.. 2015. ‘Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between Mother Earth and ecosystem services’. Environmental Science and Policy54: 487–496. Crossref.
22.
HunnE.1999. ‘The value of subsistence for the future of the world’. In NazareaV., (ed.) Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Located Lives, pp. 22–36. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
23.
HunnE.2007. ‘Ethnobiology in four phases’. Journal of Ethnobiology27(1): 1–10. Crossref.
KahnP.H.2002. ‘Children's affiliations with nature: Structure, development, and the problem of environmental generational amnesia.’ In KahnP. and KellertS.R. (eds), Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations, pp. 93–116. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
KraussM.1992. ‘The world's language in crisis’. Language68: 4–10. Crossref.
31.
LiuS., CostanzaR., FarberS. and TroyA.. 2015. ‘Valuing ecosystem services’. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1185: 54–78. Crossref.
32.
LohJ., and HarmonD.. 2005. ‘A global index of biocultural diversity’. Ecological Indicators5(3): 231–241. Crossref.
33.
MaffiL.1998. ‘Language: A resource for nature’. Nature and Resources34(4): 12–21.
34.
MaffiL.2001. ‘On the interdependence of biological and cultural diversity’. In MaffiL., (ed.) On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment, pp. 1–50. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
35.
MaffiL.2005. ‘Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity’. Annual Review of Anthropology34: 599–617. Crossref.
36.
MaffiL.2007. ‘Biocultural diversity and sustainability.’ In PrettyJ. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Environment and Society, pp. 267–278. London: Sage Publications.
MaffiL., and WoodleyE.. 2012. Biocultural Diversity Conservation: A Global Sourcebook. London: Routledge.
39.
MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment).2004. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Washington: Island Press.
40.
MA.2005. Synthesis Report. Washington: Island Press.
41.
MillerJ.2005. ‘Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience’. Trends in Ecology and Evolution20(8): 430–434. Crossref.
42.
MühlhäuslerP.2001. ‘Ecolinguistic, linguistic diversity and ecological diversity’. In MaffiL., (ed.) On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment, pp. 133–144. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
43.
NabhanG.P., and St AntoineS.. 1993. ‘The loss of floral and faunal story: The extinction of experience’. In KellertS.R. and WilsonE.O., (ed.) The Biophilia Hypothesis, pp. 229–250. Washington: Island Press.
44.
NazareaV. (ed.). 1999. Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Located Lives. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
45.
NelsonG.C., . 2006. ‘Anthropogenic drivers of ecosystem change: An overview’. Ecology and Society11(2): art. 29. Crossref.
PascualU., . 2017. ‘Valuing nature's contributions to people: The IPBES approach’. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability26: 7–16. Crossref.
48.
PooleA.K.2015. ‘Urban sustainability and the extinction of experience: Acknowledging drivers of biocultural loss for socio-ecological well-being’, PhD thesis. Denton: University of North Texas.
49.
PoseyD. A., and DutfieldG.. 1996. Beyond Intellectual Property Rights: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
50.
PrettyJ.2011. ‘Interdisciplinary progress in approaches to address social-ecological and ecocultural systems’. Environmental Conservation38(2): 127–139. Crossref.
51.
PrettyJ., . 2009. ‘The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: Towards integration’. Conservation and Society7(2): 100–112.
52.
PyleR.M.1993. The Thunder Tree: Lessons From an Urban Wildland. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
53.
RaymondC.M., . 2017. ‘An embodied perspective on the co-production of cultural ecosystem services: Toward embodied ecosystems’. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, in press.
RozziR.2013. ‘Biocultural ethics: From biocultural homogenization toward bio-cultural conservation’. In RozziR. (eds), Linking Ecology and Ethics for a Changing World, pp. 9–32. Dordrecht: Springer.
56.
RozziR.2015a. ‘Earth stewardship and the biocultural ethic: Latin American perspectives’. In RozziR. (eds), Earth Stewardship, pp. 87–112. Cham: Springer.
57.
RozziR.2015b. ‘Implications of biocultural ethics for earth stewardship’. In RozziR. (eds), Earth Stewardship, pp. 113–136. Cham: Springer.
RozziR. (eds). 2013. Linking Ecology and Ethics for a Changing World: Values, Philosophy, and Action. Dordrecht: Springer.
60.
SamwaysM.J.2007. ‘Rescuing the extinction of experience’. Biodiversity and Conservation16(7): 1995–1997. Crossref.
61.
SchröterM., . 2014. ‘Ecosystem services as a contested concept: A synthesis of critique and counter-arguments’. Conservation Letters7(6): 514–523. Crossref.
TengöM.. 2017. ‘Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond: Lessons learned for sustainability’. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability26: 17–25. Crossref.
Van RiperC.J., . 2017. ‘Incorporating sociocultural phenomena into ecosystem-service valuation: The importance of critical pluralism’. BioScience67(3): 233–244. Crossref.
72.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development).1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73.
WolvertonS.2013. ‘Ethnobiology 5: Interdisciplinarity in an era of rapid environmental change’. Ethnobiology Letters4: 21–25. Crossref.
74.
WyndhamF.2017. ‘The trouble with TEK’. Ethnobiology Letters8(1): 78–80. Crossref.
75.
ZentS.2009. ‘Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and biocultural diversity: A close-up look at linkages, delearning trends, and changing patterns of transmission.’ In BatesP. (eds), Learning and Knowing in Indigenous Societies Today, pp. 39–58. Paris: UNESCO.
