Arias-ArévaloP., Gómez-BaggethunE., Martín-LópezB. and Pérez-RincónM.. 2018. ‘Widening the evaluative space for ecosystem services: A taxonomy of plural values and valuation methods’. Environmental Values27(1): 29–53.
2.
BraitoM.T., BöckK., FlintC., MuharA., MuharS. and PenkerM.. 2017. ‘Human–nature relationships and linkages to environmental behaviour’. Environmental Values26(3): 365–389. Crossref.
3.
D'AmatoD., DrosteN., ChanS. and HoferA.. 2017. ‘The green economy: Pragmatism or revolution? Perceptions of young researchers on social ecological transformation’. Environmental Values24(4): 413–435. Crossref.
4.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).2007. Securing a healthy natural environment: An Action Plan for embedding an ecosystem approach, London: Defra.
5.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).2011. The Natural Choice: Securing the value of nature. Natural Environment White Paper CM 8082. London: TSO.
6.
EngebretsenE., HeggenK. and OttersenO.P.. 2017, ‘The Sustainable Development Goals: ambiguities of accountability’. The Lancet389(10067): 365. Crossref.
7.
FritzM. and KochM.. 2016. ‘Economic development and prosperity patterns around the world: structural challenges for a global steady-state economy’. Global Environmental Change38: 41–48. Crossref.
8.
GrovesC., HenwoodK., ShiraniF., ButlerC., ParkhillK. and PidgeonN.. 2016. ‘Invested in unsustainability? On the psychosocial patterning of engagement in practices’. Environmental Values25: 309–328. Crossref.
9.
HerrickC.N.2018. ‘Self-identity and sense of place: Some thoughts regarding climate change adaptation policy formulation’. Environmental Values27(1): 81–102.
10.
Horton, 2014. ‘Offline: Why the Sustainable Development Goals will fail’. The Lancet383: 2196.
11.
HowellR. and AllenS.. 2017. ‘People and planet: Values, motivations and formative influences of individuals acting to mitigate climate change’. Environmental Values26(2): 131–155. Crossref.
12.
KochM.2018. ‘The naturalisation of growth: Marx, the regulation approach and Bourdieu’. Environmental Values27(1): 9–27.
13.
LibrováH. and PelikánV.. 2016. ‘Ethical motivations and the phenomenon of disappointment in two types of environmental movements: Neo-environmentalism and the Dark Mountain Project’. Environmental Values25(2): 167–193. Crossref.
14.
NilssonM., GriggsD. and VisbeckM.. 2016. ‘Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals’. Nature534 (16 June 2016): 320–322. Crossref.
15.
PolanyiK.1944/1957/2001. The Great Transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Massachusetts: Beacon Press. [1944 first hb edition; 1957 first pb edition; 2001 the second pb edition that I used].
16.
PooleA.K.2018. ‘Where is goal 18? The need for biocultural heritage in the sustainable development goals’. Environmental Values27(1): 55–80.
17.
ScheinE.1984. ‘Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture’. Sloan Management Review25(2): 3–16.
18.
SpashC.L. and AslaksenI.. 2015. ‘Re-establishing an ecological discourse in the policy debate over how to value ecosystems and biodiversity’. Journal of Environmental Management159: 245–253. Crossref.
19.
TemperL., del BeneD. and Martinez-AlierJ.. 2015. ‘Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas’. Journal of Political Ecology22: 255–278.
20.
Unite Nations (UN).2015. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Seventieth session, Agenda items 15 and 116. A/RES/70/1.
21.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).2016. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December; Addendum – Part two: Action taken by the Confederation of the Parties at its twenty-first session. Decision 1/CP.21 Adoption of the Paris Agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1.