Waste has often been a target of literature and policy promoting pro-environmental behaviour. However, little attention has been paid to how subjects interpret and construct waste in their daily lives. In this article we develop a synthesis of practice theory and psycho-social concepts of attachment and transitional space to explore how biographically patterned relationships and attachments to practice shape subjects’ understandings of resource consumption and disposal. Deploying biographical interview data produced by the Energy Biographies Project, we illustrate how tangible, intersubjective and interdependent experiences rub up against cultural and behavioural norms, reshaping the meanings and strategies through which subjects interpret and manage waste.
AdamB., and GrovesC.. 2011. ‘Futures tended: Care and future-oriented responsibility’. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society31(1): 17–27. Crossref.
3.
AjzenI.1991. ‘The theory of planned behaviour’. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211. Crossref.
4.
AndersonB.2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. edn. London: Verso.
5.
BarrS.2007. ‘Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management’. Environment and Behavior39(4): 435–473. Crossref.
6.
BorgmannA.1993. Crossing the Postmodern Divide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BrethertonI.1992. ‘The origins of attachment theory: Jon Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth’. Developmental Psychology28(5): 759–775. Crossref.
8.
CollingwoodP., and DarntonA.. 2010. ‘Motivations for pro-environmental behaviour: A report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs by RESOLVE’. London: DEFRA.
9.
CorralizaJ., and BerenguerJ.. 2000. ‘Environmental values, beliefs, and actions: A situational approach’. Environment and Behaviour32(6): 832–848. Crossref.
10.
DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change).2011. ‘The carbon plan: Delivering our low carbon future’. London: DECC.
11.
DECC.2015. ‘Smart metering early learning project: Synthesis report’. London: DECC.
12.
DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs).2008. ‘A framework for pro-environmental behaviour’. London; DEFRA.
13.
DEFRA.2013. ‘Prevention is better than cure: The role of waste prevention in moving to a more resource efficient economy’. London: DEFRA.
14.
DouglasM.1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and TabooLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15.
EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation).2013. ‘Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition’. Cowes: Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
16.
FinnM., and HenwoodK.. 2009. ‘Exploring masculinities within men's identificatory imaginings of first-time fatherhood’. British Journal of Social Psychology48(3): 547–562. Crossref.
17.
GeeS.2010. Making Waste: Leftovers and the Eighteenth-Century Imagination. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
GregsonN., MetcalfeA. and CreweL.. 2007. ‘Moving things along: The conduits and practices of divestment in consumption’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32(2): 187–200. Crossref.
19.
GrovesC.2015. ‘The bomb in my backyard, the serpent in my house: Environmental justice, risk, and the colonisation of attachment’. Environmental Politics24(6): 853–873. Crossref.
20.
GrovesC., HenwoodK., ShiraniF., ButlerC., ParkhillK. and PidgeonN.. 2016a. ‘Invested in unsustainability? On the psychosocial patterning of engagement in practices’. Environmental Values25(3): 309–328. Crossref.
21.
GrovesC., HenwoodK., ShiraniF., ButlerC., ParkhillK. and PidgeonN.. 2016b. ‘The grit in the oyster: Questioning socio-technical imaginaries through biographical narratives of engagement with energy’. Journal of Responsible Innovation3(1): 4–25. Crossref.
22.
GrovesC., HenwoodK., ShiraniF., ButlerC., ParkhillK. and PidgeonN.. 2016c. ‘Energy biographies: Narrative genres, lifecourse transitions, and practical change’. Science, Technology and Human Values41(3): 483–508. Crossref.
23.
HallS.1996. ‘Introduction: Who needs identity?’ In HallS. and Du GayP. (eds), Questions of Cultural Identity, pp. 1–17. London: Sage.
24.
HannisM.2015. ‘The virtues of acknowledged ecological dependence: Sustainability, autonomy and human flourishing’. Environmental Values24(2): 145–164. Crossref.
25.
HardsS.2011. ‘Social practice and the evolution of personal environmental values’. Environmental Values20: 23–42. Crossref.
26.
HardsS.2012. ‘Tales of transformation: The potential of a narrative approach’. Geoforum43(4): 760–771. Crossref.
27.
HenwoodK., GrovesC. and ShiraniF.. 2016. ‘Relationality, entangled practices and psychosocial exploration of intergenerational dynamics in sustainable energy studies’. Families, Relationships and Societies5(3): 393–410. Crossref.
28.
HenwoodK., and PidgeonN.. 2013. ‘Future identities: Changing identities in the UK – the next 10 years: DR17’. London: Government Office for Science.
29.
HirdM.2012. ‘Knowing waste: Towards an inhuman epistemology’. Social Epistemology26(3): 453–469. Crossref.
30.
HobsonK.2006. ‘Bins, bulbs, and shower timers: On the techno-ethics of sustainable living’. Ethics, Place and Environment9(3): 317–336. Crossref.
31.
JensenJ.O.2008. ‘Measuring consumption in households: Interpretations and strategies’. Ecological Economics68: 353–361. Crossref.
32.
KennedyG.2007. An Ontology of Trash: The Disposable and its Problematic Nature. New York: State University of New York Press.
33.
KollmussA., and AgyemanJ.. 2002. ‘Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?’ Environmental Education Research8(3): 239–260. Crossref.
34.
LaneR., and WatsonM.. 2012. ‘Stewardship of things: The radical potential of product stewardship for re-framing responsibilities and relationships to products and materials’. Geoforum43: 1254–1265. Crossref.
35.
MallerC., and StrengersY.. 2013. ‘The global migration of everyday life: Investigating the practice memories of Australian migrants’. Geoforum44: 243–252. Crossref.
36.
MarrisP.1996. The Politics of Uncertainty: Attachment in Private and Public Life. London: Routledge.
37.
NigburD., LyonsE. and UzzellD.. 2010. ‘Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme’. British Journal of Social Psychology49: 259–284. Crossref.
38.
ParnellR., and LarsenO.. 2005. ‘Informing the development of domestic energy effi-ciency initiatives: An everyday householder-centered framework’ Environment and Behavior37(6): 787–807. Crossref.
39.
PinkS., and MackleyK.. 2012. ‘Video and a sense of the invisible: Approaching domestic energy consumption through the sensory home’. Sociological Research Online17(1): 3. Crossref.
40.
QuestedT.E, MarshE., StunellD. and ParryA.D. 2013. ‘Spaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviours’. Resources, Conservation and Recycling79: 43–51. Crossref.
41.
ReckwitzA.2002. ‘Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing’. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243–263. Crossref.
42.
RettieR., BurchellK. and BernhamC.. 2014. ‘Social normalisation: Using marketing to make green normal’. Journal of Consumer Behaviour13(1): 9–17. Crossref.
43.
RootesC.2009. ‘Environmental movements, waste and waste infrastructure: An introduction’. Environmental Politics18(6): 817–834. Crossref.
44.
ScanlanJ.2005. On Garbage. London: Reaktion.
45.
ScannellL., and GiffordR.. 2010. ‘Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework’. Journal of Environmental Psychology30(1): 1–10. Crossref.
46.
SchatzkiT.R.2003. ‘A new societist social ontology’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences33(2): 174–202. Crossref.
47.
ShiraniF., ParkhillK., ButlerC., GrovesC., PidgeonN. and HenwoodK.. 2016. ‘Asking about the future: Methodological insights from energy biographies’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology19(4): 429–444. Crossref.
48.
ShockleyK.2014. ‘Sourcing stability in a time of climate change’. Environmental Values23: 199–217. Crossref.
49.
ShoveE.2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Oxford: Berg.
50.
ShoveE.2010. ‘Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change’. Environment and Planning A42(6): 1273–1285. Crossref.
51.
ShoveE., and PantzarM.. 2007. ‘Recruitment and reproduction: The careers and carriers of digital photography and floorball’. Human Affairs17(2): 154–167. Crossref.
52.
ShoveE., PantzarM. and WatsonM.. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London: Sage.
53.
SpaargarenG.2011. ‘Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order’. Global Environmental Change21(3): 813–822. Crossref.
54.
StegL., DreijerinkL. and AbrahameseW.. 2005. ‘Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory’. Journal of Environmental Psychology25(4): 415–425. Crossref.
55.
SternP.C.2000. ‘Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour’. Journal of Social Issues56(3): 407–424. Crossref.
56.
SternP.C., DietzT., AbelT., GuagnanoG.A. and KalofL.. 1999. ‘A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism’. Human Ecology Review6(2): 81–97.
57.
StrengersY., and MallerC.. 2012. ‘Materialising energy and water resources in everyday practices: Insights for securing supply systems’. Global Environmental Change22(3): 754–763. Crossref.
58.
SuhJ.2014. ‘Towards sustainable agricultural stewardship: Evolution and future directions of the permaculture concept’. Environmental Values23(1): 75–98. Crossref.
59.
ThomasC., and SharpV.. 2013. ‘understanding the normalisation of recycling behaviour and its implications for other pro-environmental behaviours: A review of social norms and recycling’. Resources, Conservation and Recycling79: 11–20. Crossref.
60.
WatsonM., BulkeleyH. and HudsonR.. 2008. ‘Unpicking environmental policy integration with tales from waste management’. Environment and Planning C26(3): 481–498. Crossref.
61.
WatsonM., and ShoveE.. 2008. ‘Product, competence, project and practice: DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption’. Journal of Consumer Culture8(1): 69–89. Crossref.
62.
WengerE.1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
WetherellM., and EdleyN.. 1998. ‘Gender practices: Steps in the analysis of men and masculinity’. In HenwoodK., GriffinC. and PhoenixA. (eds), Standpoints and Differences: Essays in the Practice of Feminist Psychology, pp. 156–173. London: Sage.
64.
WhitmarshL., and O'NeillS.. 2010. ‘Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours’. Identity, Place, and Environmental Behaviour30(3): 305–314. Crossref.
65.
WinnicottD.W.1971. Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock.
66.
YatesC., and SclaterS.D.. 2000. ‘Culture, psychology and transitional space’. In SquireC., (ed.) Culture in Psychology, pp. 133–146. London: Routledge.
