Local opposition to infrastructure projects that implement renewable energy (RE), such as wind farms, is often strong even if state-wide support for RE is strikingly high. The slogan ‘Not In My Backyard’ (NIMBY) has become synonymous for this kind of protest. This paper revisits the question of what might be wrong with those who are NIMBYs about RE projects, and how best to address them. I will argue that local opponents to wind farm (and other RE) developments do not necessarily fail to contribute their fair share to producing a desirable public good (clean energy). In fact, with landscape concerns being at the heart of much protest, the question of fair burden distribution becomes sidelined: landscape impacts cannot be distributed nor compensated for. Protests may be attempts to express a true conflict of (incommensurable) values. Understanding them as such will help us better address NIMBY concerns and overcome such opposition through ensuring procedural justice.
Australian Greenhouse Office and Australian Wind Energy Association [AGO/AWEA].2004. ‘Wind Farm Fact Sheets’. Online at www.auswind.org (accessed 5 July 2017).
2.
Australian Wind Energy Association and Australian Council of National Trusts.2007. ‘Wind Farms and Landscape Values; National Assessment Framework; Foundation Report’. Melbourne: Australian Wind Energy Association.
3.
BaisnerA.J., AndersenJ.L., FindsenA., Yde GranathS.W., MadsenK.O. and DesholmM.. 2010. ‘Minimizing collision risk between migrating raptors and marine wind farms: development of a spatial planning tool’. Environmental Management46(5): 801–808. Crossref.
4.
BellD., GrayT. and HaggettC.. 2005. ‘The “social gap” in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses’. Environmental Politics14(4): 460–477. Crossref.
5.
CowellR., BristowG. and MundayM.. 2011. ‘Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development’. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management54(4): 539–557. Crossref.
CrozierG.K.D. and HajzlerC.. 2010. ‘Nimby claims, free riders and universalisabil-ity’. Ethics, Place & Environment13(3): 317–320. Crossref.
8.
CullityG.1995. ‘Moral free riding’. Philosophy and Public Affairs24(1): 3–34. Crossref.
9.
CullityG.2008. ‘Public goods and fairness’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy86(1): 1–21. Crossref.
10.
DiesendorfM.2011. ‘Redesigning energy systems’. In SchlosbergD., NorgaardR.B. and DryzekJ.S. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, pp. 561–580. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
11.
DrenthenM.2010. ‘NIMBY and the ethics of the particular’. Ethics, Place & Environment13(3): 321–323. Crossref.
12.
EkinsP. and DresnerS.. 2004. ‘Reducing the impact of “green” taxes and charges on low-income households’. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Online at: http://www.psi.org.uk/pdf/2004/greentaxesandcharges.pdf (accessed 5 July 2017).
13.
FeldmanS. and TurnerD.. 2010. ‘Why not NIMBY?’ Ethics, Place & Environment13(3): 251–266. Crossref.
14.
FeldmanS. and TurnerD.. 2014. ‘Why not NIMBY?’ Ethics, Policy & Environment17(1): 105–115.
GoodinR.E.1989. ‘Theories of compensation’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies9(1): 56–75. Crossref.
17.
GrossC.2007. ‘Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance’. Energy Policy35(5): 2727–2736. Crossref.
18.
HaggettC.2010. ‘Why not NIMBY? A response, reviewing the empirical evidence’. Ethics, Place & Environment13(3): 313–316. Crossref.
HermanssonH.2007. ‘The ethics of NIMBY conflicts’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice10(1): 23–34. Crossref.
21.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC].2011. Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
JamiesonD.2011. ‘Energy, ethics, and the transformation of nature’. In ArnoldD.G., (ed.) The Ethics of Global Climate Change, pp. 16–37. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
23.
MillerD.2011. ‘Taking up the slack? Responsibility and justice in situations of partial compliance’. In KnightC. and StemplowskaZ. (eds), Responsibility and Distributive Justice, pp. 230–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
RazJ.1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31.
SchwenkenbecherA.2013. ‘Bridging the emissions gap: a plea for taking up the slack’. Philosophy and Public Issues3(1): 273–301.
32.
SchwenkenbecherA.2014. ‘Is there an obligation to reduce one's individual carbon footprint?’ Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy17(2): 168–188. Crossref.
33.
ShueH.2005. ‘Responsibility to future generations and the technological transition’. In Sinnott-ArmstrongW. and HowarthR.B. (eds), Perspectives on Climate Change: Science, Economics, Politics, Ethics, pp. 265–283. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Crossref.
34.
ShueH.2011. ‘Face reality? After you! – A call for leadership on climate change’. Ethics & International Affairs25(1): 17–26. Crossref.
35.
TokeD.2002. ‘Wind power in UK and Denmark: can rational choice help explain different outcomes?’ Environmental Politics11(4): 83–100. Crossref.
WarrenC.R., and McFadyenM.. 2010. ‘Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from South-west Scotland’. Land Use Policy27(2): 204–213. Crossref.
38.
WolsinkM.2007. ‘Planning of renewables schemes: deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-co-operation’. Energy Policy35(5): 2692–2704. Crossref.
