While many theories exist to explain the complexity of environmental behaviour, the role of individuals’ relationship with nature has not yet been fully clarified. This paper attempts to operationalise human-nature relationships. It expands upon a scale assessed by an iterative process of mixed methods in the US and Europe. This scale is then used to assess individuals’ relationship with nature, and whether such relationships correlate with environmental behaviour. The value scale of Schwartz's Theory of Basic Values is used to validate the results. The results verify that people hold multiple human-nature relationships, confirm strong correlations between human-nature relationships and values, and reveal that individuals’ behaviour is connected to the relationship they have with nature.
Aguilar-LuzónM.d.C., García-MartínezJ.M.Á., Calvo-SalgueroA. and SalinasJ.M.. 2012. ‘Comparative study between the theory of planned behavior and the value– belief–norm model regarding the environment, on Spanish housewives' recycling behavior’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology42(11): 2797–2833. Crossref.
3.
AjzenI.1991. ‘The theory of planned behavior’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211. Crossref.
4.
BardiA. and SchwartzS.H.. 2003. ‘Values and behavior: strength and structure of relations’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin29(10): 1207–1220. Crossref.
5.
BauerN., WallnerA. and HunzikerM.. 2009. ‘The change of European landscapes: human-nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland’. Journal of Environmental Management90(9): 2910–2920. Crossref.
6.
BeierleinC., DavidovE., SchmidtP., SchwartzS.H. and RammstedtB.. 2012. ‘Testing the discriminant validity of Schwartz's portrait value questionnaire items – a replication and extension of Knoppen and Saris (2009)’. Survey Research Methods6(1): 25–36.
7.
BensonM.H. and CraigR.K.. 2014. ‘The end of sustainability’. Society & Natural Resources27(7): 777–782. Crossref.
8.
BielA. and ThøgersenJ.. 2007. ‘Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: a review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour’. Journal of Economic Psychology28(1): 93–112. Crossref.
9.
BigaC.F.2006. ‘Explaining environmentally significant individual behaviour: identity theory, multiple identities, and shared meanings’. PhD dissertation, Washington State University. Accessible online at: http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Dissertations/Spring2006/C_Biga_042606.pdf (accessed 6 February 2017).
10.
Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management [BMLFUW].2017. ‘Footprint-Derökologische Fußabdruck’. Accessible online at: http://www.mein-fussabdruck.at/ (accessed 7 February 2017).
11.
BolderdijkJ.W., GorsiraM., KeizerK. and StegL.. 2013. ‘Values determine the (in) effectiveness of informational interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior’. PLoS ONE8(12): e83911. Crossref.
Casado-AsensioJ. and SteurerR.. 2014. ‘Integrated strategies on sustainable development, climate change mitigation and adaptation in Western Europe: communication rather than coordination’. Journal of Public Policy34(3): 437–473. Crossref.
16.
ChanK.M.A., SatterfieldT. and GoldsteinJ.. 2012. ‘Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values’. Ecological Economics74: 8–18. Crossref.
17.
ChiltonP., CromptonT., KasserT., MaioG. and NolanA.. 2012. ‘Communicating big-ger-than-self problems to extrinsically-oriented audiences’. Godalming: WWF-UK.
18.
ClaudyM. and O'DriscollA.. 2008. ‘Beyond economics: a behavioural approach to energy efficiency in domestic buildings’. Euro-Asian Journal of Sustainable Energy Development Policy1: 27–40.
DunlapR.E., van LiereK.D., MertigA.G. and JonesR.E.. 2000. ‘New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale’. Journal of Social Issues56(3): 425–442. Crossref.
24.
EidelsonR.J.1997. ‘Complex adaptive systems in the behaviour and social sciences’. Review of General Psychology1(1): 42–71. Crossref.
25.
EloS. and KyngäsH.. 2008. ‘The qualitative content analysis process’. Journal of Advanced Nursing62(1): 107–115. Crossref.
26.
EvansL., MaioG.R., CornerA., HodgettsC.J., AhmedS. and HahnU.. 2013. ‘Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour’. Nature Climate Change3(2): 122–125. Crossref.
27.
FairheadJ., LeachM. and ScoonesI.. 2012. ‘Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?’ Journal of Peasant Studies39(2): 237–261. Crossref.
28.
FischerA. and YoungJ.C.. 2007. ‘Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation’. Biological Conservation136(2): 271–282. Crossref.
29.
FlintC.G., KunzeI., MuharA., YoshidaY. and PenkerM.. 2013. ‘Exploring empirical typologies of human–nature relationships and linkages to the ecosystem services concept’. Landscape and Urban Planning120: 208–217. Crossref.
30.
FotopoulosC., KrystallisA. and AnastasiosP.. 2011. ‘Portrait Value Questionnaire's (PVQ) usefulness in explaining quality food-related consumer behavior’. British Food Journal113(2): 248–279. Crossref.
31.
GadenneD., SharmaB., KerrD. and SmithT.. 2011. ‘The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours’. Energy Policy39(12): 7684–7694. Crossref.
32.
GaterslebenB., StegL. and VlekC.. 2002. ‘Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior’. Environment and Behavior34(3): 335–362. Crossref.
33.
GoslingE. and WilliamsK.J.H.. 2010. ‘Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: testing connectedness theory among farmers’. Journal of Environmental Psychology30(3): 298–304. Crossref.
34.
de GrootJ.I.M. and StegL.. 2008. ‘Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations’. Environment and Behavior40(3): 330–354. Crossref.
35.
de GrootJ.I.M., StegL., KeizerM., FarsangA. and WattA.. 2012. ‘Environmental values in post-socialist Hungary: is it useful to distinguish egoistic, altruistic and biospheric values?’ Sociologicky Casopis48(3): 421–440.
36.
de GrootM.2012. ‘Exploring the relationship between public environmental ethics and river flood policies in Western Europe’. Journal of Environmental Management93(1): 1–9. Crossref.
37.
de GrootM. and van den BornJ.G.. 2007. ‘Humans, nature and God: exploring images of their interrelationships in Victoria, Canada’. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology11(3): 324–351. Crossref.
38.
de GrootM., DrenthenM. and de GrootW.T.. 2011. ‘Public visions of the human/ nature relationship and their implications for environmental ethics’. Environmental Ethics33(1): 25–44. Crossref.
39.
de GrootM. and de GrootW.T.. 2009. ‘Room for river measures and public visions in the Netherlands: a survey on river perceptions among riverside residents’. Water Resources Research45(7). Accessible online at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2008WR007339/pdf (accessed 7 February 2017).
40.
de GrootW.T. and van den BornR.J.G.. 2003. ‘Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in the Netherlands’. Landscape and Urban Planning63(3): 127–138. Crossref.
41.
Hedlund-de WittA.2012. ‘Exploring worldviews and their relationships to sustainable lifestyles: towards a new conceptual and methodological approach’. Ecological Economics84: 74–83. Crossref.
42.
Hedlund-de WittA., de BoerJ. and BoersemaJ.J.. 2014. ‘Exploring inner and outer worlds: a quantitative study of worldviews, environmental attitudes, and sustainable lifestyles’. Journal of Environmental Psychology37: 40–54. Crossref.
43.
HeylM., DíazE.M. and CifuentesL.. 2014. ‘environmental attitudes and behaviors of college students: a case study conducted at a Chilean university’. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología45(3): 489–502. Crossref.
44.
HondoH. and BabaK.. 2010. ‘Socio-psychological impacts of the introduction of energy technologies: change in environmental behavior of households with photovoltaic systems’. Applied Energy87(1): 229–235. Crossref.
45.
HowellR.A.2013. ‘It's not (just) ‘the environment, stupid!’ Values, motivations, and routes to engagement of people adopting lower-carbon lifestyles’. Global Environmental Change23(1): 281–290. Crossref.
46.
HurstM., DittmarH., BondR. and KasserT.. 2013. ‘The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviors: a meta-analysis’. Journal of Environmental Psychology36: 257–269. Crossref.
47.
JonssonA.-K.E. and NilssonA.. 2014. ‘Exploring the relationship between values and pro-environmental behavior: the influence of locus of control’. Environmental Values23(3): 297–314. Crossref.
48.
KamenicaE.2012. ‘Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives’. Annual Review of Economics4(1): 427–452. Crossref.
49.
KarpD.G.1996. ‘Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior’. Environment and Behavior28(1): 111–133. Crossref.
50.
KellertS.R and WilsonE.O. (eds). 1993. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
51.
KlöcknerC.A.2013. ‘A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour – a meta-analysis.’ Global Environmental Change23(5): 1028–1038. Crossref.
52.
KollmussA. and AgyemanJ.. 2002. ‘Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?’ Environmental Education Research8(3): 239–260. Crossref.
53.
LiuS.-C. and LinH.-S.. 2015. ‘Exploring undergraduate students' mental models of the environment: are they related to environmental affect and behavior?’ The Journal of Environmental Education46(1): 23–40. Crossref.
54.
LiuS.-C. and LinH.-S.. 2014. ‘Undergraduate students' ideas about nature and human–nature relationships: an empirical analysis of environmental worldviews’. Environmental Education Research20(3): 412–429. Crossref.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MEA]. 2005. ‘Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment’. Report. Washington, DC: Island Press.
57.
MilfontT.L., RichterI., SibleyC.G., WilsonM.S. and FischerR.. 2013. ‘Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Accessible online at: http://psp.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0146167213490805 (accessed 7 February 2017).
58.
MoslerH.-J., 2005. ‘Modelling environmental behaviour’. In GetznerM., SplashC. and StaglS. (eds), Alternatives for Environmental Evaluation, pp. 69–95. London: Routledge.
59.
NordlundA.M. and GarvillJ.. 2002. ‘Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior’. Environment and Behavior34(6): 740–756. Crossref.
60.
OnwezenM.C., AntonidesG. and BartelsJ.. 2013. ‘The norm activation model: an exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour’. Journal of Economic Psychology39: 141–153. Crossref.
61.
OstromE.1999. ‘Coping with tragedies of the commons’. Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 493–535. Crossref.
62.
OstromE.2009. ‘A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems’. Science325(5939): 419–422. Crossref.
63.
PoortingaW., StegL. and VlekC.. 2004. ‘Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior a study into household energy use’. Environment and Behavior36(1): 70–93. Crossref.
64.
PriceJ.C., WalkerI.A. and BoschettiF.. 2014. ‘Measuring cultural values and beliefs about environment to identify their role in climate change responses’. Journal of Environmental Psychology37: 8–20. Crossref.
65.
RaymondC.M., SinghG.G., BenessaiahK., BernhardtJ.R., LevineJ., NelsonH., TurnerN.J., NortonB., TamJ. and ChanK.M.A.. 2013. ‘Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human–environment relationships’. BioScience63(7): 536–546. Crossref.
66.
SchmidtP., BambergS., DavidovE., HerrmannJ. and SchwartzS.H.. 2007. ‘Die Messung von Werten mit dem “Portraits Value Questionnaire”’. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie38(4): 261–275. Crossref.
67.
SchroederH.W.2007. ‘Place experience, gestalt, and the human–nature relationship’. Journal of Environmental Psychology27(4): 293–309. Crossref.
68.
SchultzP.W., ShriverC., TabanicoJ.J. and KhazianA.M.. 2004. ‘Implicit connections with nature’. Journal of Environmental Psychology24(1): 31–42. Crossref.
69.
SchwartzS.H.1992. ‘Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries’. In ZannaM.P., (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25: 1–65. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Crossref.
70.
SchwartzS.H., CieciuchJ., VecchioneM., DavidovE., FischerR., BeierleinC., RamosA., VerkasaloM., LönnqvistJ.E., DemirutkuK., Dirilen-GumusO. and KontyM.. 2012. ‘Refining the theory of basic individual values’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology103(4): 663–688. Crossref.
71.
SnelgarR.S.2006. ‘Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: measurement and structure’. Journal of Environmental Psychology26(2): 87–99. Crossref.
72.
SovacoolB.K., RyanS.E., SternP.C., JandaK., RochlinG., SprengD., PasqualettiM.J., WilhiteH. and LutzenhiserL.. 2015. ‘Integrating social science in energy research’. Energy Research & Social Science6: 95–99. Crossref.
StegL., BolderdijkJ.W., KeizerK. and PerlaviciuteG.. 2014. ‘An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: the role of values, situational factors and goals’. Journal of Environmental Psychology38: 104–115. Crossref.
75.
StegL., de GrootJ.I.M., DreijerinkL., AbrahamseW. and SieroF.. 2011. ‘General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: the role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern’. Society & Natural Resources24(4): 349–367. Crossref.
76.
SternP.C.2000. ‘New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior’. Journal of Social Issues56(3): 407–424. Crossref.
77.
SternP.C.2005. ‘Understanding individuals' environmentally significant behavior’. Environmental Law Institute11: 10785–10790.
78.
SternP.C., DietzT., AbelT., GuagnanoG.A. and KalofL.. 1999. ‘A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism’. Human Ecology Review6(2): 81–98.
79.
SukhdevP., WittmerH., Schröter-SchlaackC., NesshöverC., BishopJ., ten BrinkP., GundimedaH., KumarP. and SimmonsB.. 2010. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. Geneva: UNEP.
80.
TeelT.L. and ManfredoM.J.. 2010. ‘Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation’. Conservation Biology24(1): 128–139. Crossref.
81.
TeixeiraV.E.R.2007. ‘Determinism of human behavior: an hypothesis on social and individual behavior as a universal complex system’. Antopologia Portuguesa24(25): 149–163.
82.
ThøgersenJ.2006. ‘Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: an extended taxonomy’. Journal of Environmental Psychology26(4): 247–261. Crossref.
83.
ThompsonS.C.G. and BartonM.A.. 1994. ‘Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment’. Journal of Environmental Psychology14(2): 149–157. Crossref.
84.
TidballK.G.2012. ‘Urgent biophilia: human-nature interactions and biological attractions in disaster resilience’. Ecology and Society17(2): 5. Crossref.
85.
VlekC. and StegL.. 2007. ‘Human behavior and environmental sustainability: problems, driving forces, and research topics’. Journal of Social Issues63(1): 1–19. Crossref.
86.
van der WerffE., StegL. and KeizerK.. 2013. ‘The value of environmental self-identity: the relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour’. Journal of Environmental Psychology34: 55–63. Crossref.
87.
ZhengY. and YoshinoR.. 2003. ‘Diversity patterns of attitudes towards nature and environment in Japan, USA and European nations’. Behaviourmetrika30(1): 21–37. Crossref.
88.
ZweersW.2000. Participating with Nature: Outline for an Ecologization of our World View. Utrecht: International Books.
