A Diversity of Imaginaries

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cooke

2017. ‘Animal kingdoms: on habitat rights for nonhuman animals’, Environmental Values 26(1): 53–72.

di Paola

2015. ‘Virtues for the Anthropocene’, Environmental Values 24(2): 183–207.

Hannis

2015. ‘The virtues of acknowledged ecological dependence: sustainability, autonomy and human flourishing’, Environmental Values 24(2): 145–164. Crossref.

Hedberg

2016. ‘Animals, relations and the laissez-faire intuition’, Environmental Values 25(4): 427–442. Crossref.

James

S. P.

2016. ‘The trouble with environmental values’, Environmental Values 25(2): 131–44. Crossref.

Katz

2014. ‘The Nazi comparison in the debate over restoration: Nativism and domination', Environmental Values, 23(4): 377–398. Crossref.

Keulartz

2016. ‘Future directions for conservation’, Environmental Values 25(4): 385–407. Crossref.

Lennon

2017. ‘Moral-material ontologies of nature conservation in the Anthropocene: Exploring the discord between ecological restoration and novel ecosystems’, Environmental Values 26(1): 5–29.

Lenzi

D. S.

2017. ‘Relativism, ambiguity and the environmental virtues: An exploration of care for nature’, Environmental Values 26(1): 91–109.

10.

Nolt

2017. ‘Are there infinite welfare differences among living things?’, Environmental Values 26(1): 73–89.

11.

Prior

and Brady

2017. ‘Environmental aesthetics and rewilding’, Environmental Values 26(1): 36–51.

12.

Steinwall

2015. ‘Naturalness or biodiversity: Negotiating the dilemma of intervention in Swedish protected area management’, Environmental Values 24(1): 31–54.

13.

Verduijn

, Ploegmakers

, Meijerink

and Leroy

2015. ‘Pushing the radical nature concept in the Netherlands: An agency perspective’, Environmental Values 24(1): 55–77. Crossref.