DeliègeG.2016. ‘Contact! contact! Nature preservation as the preservation of meaning’. Environmental Values25 (4): 409–425.
2.
HedbergT.2016. ‘Animals, relations, and the laissez-faire intuition’. Environmental Values25 (4): 427–442.
3.
HollandA.2011. ‘Why it is important to take account of history’. Ethics, Policy & Environment14 (3): 377–392. CrossRef.
4.
HollandA.2009. ‘Darwin and the meaning of life’. Environmental Values18 (4): 503–518. CrossRef.
5.
KatzE.2014. ‘The Nazi comparison in the debate over restoration: Nativism and domination’. Environmental Values23 (4): 377–398. CrossRef.
6.
KeulartzJ.2016. ‘Future directions for conservation’. Environmental Values25 (4): 385–407.
7.
LibrováH. and PelikánV.. 2015. ‘Ethical motivations and the phenomenon of disappointment in two types of environmental movements: Neo-environmentalism and the Dark Mountain Project’. Environmental Values25 (2): 167–193. CrossRef.
8.
O'BrienW.2006. ‘Exotic invasions, nativism, and ecological restoration: On the persistence of a contentious debate’. Ethics, Place and Environment9 (1): 63–77. CrossRef.
9.
PalmerC.2010. Animal Ethics in Context, (New York: Columbia University Press).
10.
PalmerC. and LarsonB. M. H.. 2014. ‘Should we move the whitebark pine? Assisted migration, ethics and global environmental change’. Environmental Values23 (6): 641–662. CrossRef.
11.
SagoffM.2005. ‘Do non-native species threaten the natural environment?’ Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics18 (3): 215–236. CrossRef.
12.
SiipiH. and AhteensuuM.. 2016. ‘Moral relevance of range and naturalness in assisted migration’. Environmental Values25 (4): 465–483.
13.
SpashC.L.2009. ‘The new environmental pragmatists, pluralism and sustainability’. Environmental Values18 (3): 253–256. CrossRef.
14.
SteinwallA.2015. ‘Naturalness or biodiversity: Negotiating the dilemma of intervention in Swedish protected area management’. Environmental Values24 (1): 31–54. CrossRef.
15.
SwitzerD. and AngeliN. F.. 2016. ‘Human and non-human migration: Understanding species introduction and translocation through migration ethics’. Environmental Values25 (4): 443–463.
16.
VerduijnS., PloegmakersH., MeijerinkS. and LeroyP.. 2015. ‘Pushing the radical nature development policy concept in the Netherlands: An agency perspective’. Environmental Values24 (1): 55–77. CrossRef.
17.
WoodsM. and MoriartyP. V.. 2001. ‘Strangers in a strange land: The problem of exotic species’. Environmental Values10 (2): 163–191. CrossRef.
