If we are to assess whether our attitudes towards nature are morally, aesthetically or in any other way appropriate or inappropriate, then we will need to know what those attitudes are. Drawing on the works of Katie McShane, Alan Holland and Christine Swanton, I challenge the common assumption that to love, respect, honour, cherish or adopt any other sort of pro-attitude towards any natural X simply is to value X in some way and to some degree. Depending on how one interprets ‘value', that assumption is, I contend, either false or vacuous. I argue that to assess the appropriateness of a person's pro-attitudes towards a natural entity one must in some cases appeal to the concepts of status and/or bond, and not just that of value. To develop my argument, I appeal to the works of two nature writers – Robert Macfarlane and J. A. Baker.
BakerJ.A.2005. The Peregrine. New York: New York Review Books.
2.
CarrB.1999. ‘Pity and compassion as social virtues’. Philosophy74 (289): 411–429. CrossRef.
3.
ClingermanF., TreanorB., DrenthenM. and UtslerD. (eds) 2014. Interpreting Nature: The Emerging Field of Environmental Hermeneutics. New York: Fordham University Press.
4.
DarwallS.1977. ‘Two kinds of respect’. Ethics88: 36–49. CrossRef.
5.
De MonticelliR.2006. ‘The feeling of values: For a phenomenological theory of af-fectivity’. In BagnaraS. and Crampton SmithG. (eds), Theories and Practice in Interaction Design, pp. 57–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
Des JardinsJ.R.2001. Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy, 3rd edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7.
DiamondC.1978. ‘Eating meat and eating people’. Philosophy53 (206): 465–479. CrossRef.
8.
GaitaR.2003. The Philosopher's Dog. London: Routledge.
HollandA.2012. ‘The value space of meaningful relations’. In BradyE. and PhemisterP. (eds), Transformative Values: Human-Environment Relations in Theory and Practice, pp. 3–15. Dordrecht: Springer.
11.
HollandA.2011a. ‘Why it is important to take account of history’. Ethics, Policy & Environment14 (3): 377–392. CrossRef.
12.
HollandA.2011b. ‘What do we do about bleakness?’ Environmental Values20: 315–321. CrossRef.
13.
HollandA.2009. ‘Darwin and the meaning of life’. Environmental Values18: 503–518. CrossRef.
14.
JamesS.P.2015. ‘Why old things matter’. Journal of Moral Philosophy12: 313–329. CrossRef.
15.
JenkinsS.2013. ‘Compassion and the ethics of violence’. In EmmanuelS.M., (ed.) A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy, pp. 466–475. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossRef.
16.
KollmussA. and AgyemanJ.. 2002. ‘Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?’ Environmental Education Research8 (3): 239–260. CrossRef.
SingerI.2009. Philosophy of Love: A Partial Summing-Up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
SwantonC.2010. ‘A challenge to intellectual virtue from moral virtue: The case of universal love’. Metaphilosophy41 (1–2): 152–171. CrossRef.
29.
SwantonC.2003. Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.
30.
VellemanJ.D.1999. ‘Love as a moral emotion’. Ethics109 (2): 338–374. CrossRef.
31.
WilliamsB.1992. ‘Must a concern for the environment be centred on human beings?’ In TaylorC.C.W. (ed.), Ethics and the Environment, pp. 60–68 (Oxford: Corpus Christi College).
