When it comes to assessing the deontic status of acts and policies in the context of risk and uncertainty, moral theories are often at a loss. In this paper we hope to show that employing a multi-dimensional consequentialist framework provides ethical guidance for decision-making in complex situations. The paper starts by briefly rehearsing consequentialist responses to the issue of risk, as well as their shortcomings. We then go on to present our own proposal based on three dimensions: wellbeing, fairness and probability. In the last section we apply our approach to a comparison of different climate policy options, including stratospheric solar-radiation management.
BurnsW.2011. ‘Climate geoengineering: solar radiation management and its implications for intergenerational equity’. Stanford Journal of Law, Science & Policy4: 39–55.
DaviesG.2010. ‘Geoengineering: a critique’. Climate Law1: 429–441.
6.
GoesM., TuanaN. and KellerK.. 2011. ‘The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering’. Climatic Change109: 719–744. CrossRef.
7.
JacksonF.1991. ‘Decision-theoretic consequentialism and the nearest and dearest objection’. Ethics101: 461–482. CrossRef.
8.
LenmanJ.2000. ‘Consequentialism and cluelessness’. Philosophy & Public Affairs29: 342–70. CrossRef.
9.
LouisM.E.S. and HessJ.J.. 2008. ‘Climate change impacts on and implications for global health’. American Journal of Preventive Medicine35: 527–538.
10.
MeyerL.H. and RoserD.. 2009. ‘Enough for the future’. In GosseriesA. and MeyerL.H. (eds), Intergenerational Justice, pp. 219–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.
11.
MeyerL.H. and RoserD.. 2010. ‘Climate justice and historical emissions’. In MeyerL.H. and MatraversM. (eds), ‘Justice, Equality and Democracy’, special issue of Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13: 229–253. CrossRef.
PetersonM.2013. The Dimensions of Consequentialism: Ethics, Equality and Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
18.
PettitP.1984. ‘Satisficing consequentialism’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 58: 165–176.
19.
PrestonC.J.2012. ‘Solar radiation management and vulnerable populations: The moral deficit and its prospect’. In PrestonC.J., (ed.) Engineering the Climate: The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management, pp. 77–93. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
20.
RickeK.L., MorganM.G. and AllenM.R.. 2010. ‘Regional climate response to solar-radiation management’. Nature Geoscience3: 537–41. CrossRef.
21.
RobockA., OmanL. and StenchikovG.L.. 2008. ‘Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical SO2 injections’. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres113, D16.
22.
RogersJ.2010. ‘In defence of a version of satisficing consequentialism’. Utilitas22: 198–221. CrossRef.
23.
RossA. and Damon MatthewsH.. 2009. ‘Climate engineering and the risk of rapid climate change’. Environmental Research Letters4: 45–103. CrossRef.
24.
SchneiderS.H., SemenovS., PatwardhanA., BurtonI. (eds), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 779–810. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
SchäferS., LawrenceM., StelzerH., BornW.. 2015. The European Transdisciplinary Assessment of Climate Engineering (EuTRACE): Removing Greenhouse Gases from the Atmosphere and Reflecting Sunlight away from Earth.European Union Seventh Framework Programme.
26.
SchuppertF.2013. ‘Distinguishing basic needs and fundamental interests’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16: 24–44. CrossRef.
SloteM.1984. ‘Satisficing consequentialism’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 58: 139–63.
29.
SmartJ.J.C. and WilliamsB.. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
30.
SmartJ.J.C.1973. ‘An outline of a system of utilitarian ethics’. In SmartJ.J.C. and WilliamsB. (eds), Utilitarianism: For and Against, pp. 3–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
31.
SvobodaT., KellerK., GoesM., and TuanaN.. 2011. ‘Sulfate aerosol geoengineering: The question of justice’. Public Affairs Quarterly25: 157–179.
32.
ThomsonJ.J.1986. Rights, Restitution, and Risk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Tuana, SriverN.R.L., SvobodaT., OlsonR., IrvineP.J., Haqq-MisraJ. and KellerK.. 2012. ‘Towards integrated ethical and scientific analysis of geoengineering: A research agenda’. Ethics, Policy & Environment15: 136–157. CrossRef.
