AasenM. and VatnA.. 2013. ‘Deliberation on GMOs: A study of how a citizens' jury affects the citizens' attitudes’. Environmental Values22: 461–468. CrossRef.
2.
ArlerFinn and MellqvistHelena2015. ‘Landscape democracy, three sets of values, and the connoisseur method’. Environmental Values23: 271–298.
3.
CentemeriLaura2015. ‘Reframing problems of incommensurability in environmental conflicts through pragmatic sociology: From value pluralism to the plurality of modes of engagement with the environment’. Environmental Values23: 299–320.
4.
DryzekJ.2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
FourcadeM.2011. ‘Cents and sensibility: Economic valuation and the nature of “Nature”’. American Journal of Sociology116(6): 1721–77. CrossRef.
6.
HarawayD.2008. When Species Meet, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
LoftusA.2012. Everyday Environmentalism: Creating an Urban Political Ecology, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
Melo-EscrihuelaCarme2015. ‘Should ecological citizenship advocates praise the Green State?’ Environmental Values23: 321–344.
9.
NygrenAnja2015. ‘Governance and images: representations of certified southern producers in high-quality design markets’. Environmental Values23: 391–412.
10.
PeetersWouter, DirixJo and SterckxSigrid2015. ‘The capabilities approach and environmental sustainability: The case for functioning constraints’. Environmental Values23: 367–389.
SpashC.L.2008. ‘How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the bio-diverse trail’. Environmental Values17: 259–284. CrossRef.
13.
TrainorS.F.2006. ‘Realms of value: Conflicting natural resource values and incommensurability’. Environmental Values15: 3–29. CrossRef.
14.
VeutheyS. and GerberJ-F.2011. ‘Valuation contests over the commoditisation of the Moabi tree in south-eastern Cameroon’. Environmental Values20: 239–264. CrossRef.
