Rhetoric as a Means for Sustainable Development Policy 1

Abstract

This paper examines the hypothesis that all public policies are based, at least in part, on rhetorical strategies. By analysing public policies implemented in the context of sustainable development, this article emphasises the need for and the challenges of providing legitimate foundations for the rhetorical means used to encourage change; it is these foundations that determine a given policy's efficacy. To do so, historical analyses are used, as well as socio-economic perspectives examined through textual analysis. The text concludes by showing the importance of a common framework for action based on shared values at the regional level for legitimising the political use of rhetoric to change behaviours and attitudes.

Keywords

Public policies rhetoric needs legitimacy multidisciplinary approaches

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

R.J.

2008. Framing Discourses on the Environment: A Critical Discourse Approach. New York, NY: Routledge.

Argyris

1993. Knowledge for Action. A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Aristotle. 2012. Rhetoric. Translated by Rhys Roberts

. Adelaide: University of Adelaide, eBooks@Adelaide. Online at: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/a8rh/index.html (accessed 19 May 2014).

Arrow

K.J.

1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, Crawles Foundation for Research.

Arrow

K.J.

1974. ‘Limited Knowledge and Economic Analysis’. American Economic Review 64: 153–166.

Austin

J.L.

1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Barthes

1964. ‘Rhétorique de l'image’. Communications 4: 40–51. CrossRef.

Boltanski

and Thévenot

. 1991. On Justifications: the Economies of Worth. Translation Porter

. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bromley

D.W.

2008. ‘Volitional Pragmatism’. Ecological Economics 68: 1–13. CrossRef.

10.

Bürgenmeier

2008. Politiques économiques du développement durable. Third edition. Bruxelles: de Boeck.

11.

Cruz

2011. ‘Human needs frameworks and their contribution as analytical instruments in sustainable development policy-making’. In Rauschmeyer

, Omann

and Frühmann

(eds), Sustainable Development. Capabilities, Needs, and Well-Being, pp. 104–120. London: Routledge.

12.

Dixon

1998. Les évangélistes du marché. Paris: Raisons d'Agir.

13.

Dobson

2003. Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.

14.

Dobson

2007. ‘Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development’. Sustainable Development 15: 276–285. CrossRef.

15.

Dobson

and Bell

. 2006. Environmental Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16.

Emelianoff

2002. ‘Comment définir une ville durable ?’. In Villes et développement durable. Des expériences à échanger, online article at: http://base.d-p-h.info/en/fiches/dph/fiche-dph-8294.html (accessed 19 May 2014).

17.

Emelianoff

2005. ‘Les agendas 21 locaux : quels apports sous quelles latitudes ?’. Développement durable et territoire: Dossier 4. Online article at: http://developpementdurable.revues.org/532 (accessed 19 May 2014).

18.

Favereau

1989. ‘Marchés internes, marchés externes’. Revue Économique 40: 273–328.

19.

Gamson

W.A.

and Modigliani

. 1987. ‘The changing culture of affirmative action’. In Braungart

R.G.

and Braungart

M.M.

(eds), Research in Political Sociology (Vol. 3), pp. 137–177. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

20.

Gilly

J.-P.

and Wallet

. 2005. ‘Enchevetrement des espaces de regulation et gou-vernance territoriale : Les processus d'innovation institutionnelle dans la politique des pays en France’. Revue d'Economie Régionale et Urbaine 2005 (5): 699–722. CrossRef.

21.

Hards

2009. ‘Social practice and the evolution of personal environmental values’. Environmental Values 20: 23–42. CrossRef.

22.

Harris

Z.S.

and Dubois-Charlier

. 1969. ‘L'analyse du discours’. Langages 4: 8–45. CrossRef.

23.

Jackson

2003. ‘Sustainability and the ‘struggle for existence’: The critical role of metaphor in society's metabolism’. Environmental Values 12: 289–316. CrossRef.

24.

Jolibert

, Max-Neef

, Rauschmayer

and Paavola

. 2011. ‘Should we care about the needs of non-humans? Needs Assessment: A tool for environmental conflict resolution and sustainable organization of living beings’. Environmental Policy and Governance 21: 259–269. CrossRef.

25.

Kant

1781. Critique of Pure Reason. An Electronic Classic Series Publication (translated by Meiklejohn

J. M. D.

). http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/kant/critique-pure-reason6x9.pdf.

26.

MacKuen

, Wolak

, Keele

and Marcus

G.E.

. 2010. ‘Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation’. American Journal of Political Science 54: 440–458.

27.

Max-Neef

, Elizalde

and Hopenhayn

. 1989. ‘Human scale development an option for the future’. Development Dialogue. A Journal of International Development Cooperation 1: 7–80. CrossRef.

28.

Muller

2005. ‘Esquisse d'une théorie du changement dans l'action publique. Structures, acteurs et cadres cognitifs’. Revue Française de Science Politique 55: 155–187. CrossRef.

29.

Namkoong

, Fung

T.K.F.

and Scheufele

D.A.

. 2012. ‘The politics of emotion: News media attention, emotional responses, and participation during the 2004 US Presidential Election’. Mass Communication and Society 15: 25–45. CrossRef.

30.

Norgaard

R.B.

1989. ‘The case for methodological pluralism’. Ecological Economics 1: 3757. CrossRef.

31.

O'Neill

2011. ‘The overshadowing of needs’. In Rauschmeyer

, Omann

and Frühmann

(eds), Sustainable Development. Capabilities, needs, and well-being, pp. 25–42. London: Routledge.

32.

Ostrom

1996. ‘Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development’. World Development 24: 1073–1087. CrossRef.

33.

Pascal

1670. Pensées. Editions Firmin Didot: Paris (Edition, 2004).

34.

Pêcheux

1969. Analyse automatique du discours. Paris: Dunod.

35.

Perelman

1977. L'empire rhétorique. Rhétorique et argumentation. 2002 edition. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.

36.

Plumecocq

2012. ‘Ressources cognitives et développement territorial: une analyse textuelle appliquée aux politiques locales de développement durable’. Revue d'Economie Régionale et Urbaine 2012 (5): 765–782. CrossRef.

37.

Polanyi

1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.

38.

Redclift

1993. ‘Sustainable development: Needs, values, rights’. Environmental Values 2: 3–20. CrossRef.

39.

Reinert

1993. ‘Les ‘mondes lexicaux’ et leur ‘logique’ à travers l'analyse statistique d'un corpus de récits de cauchemars’. Langage et Société 66: 5–39. CrossRef.

40.

Rolston

III

1979. ‘Nature and human emotions’. In Miller

Jr. , Attig

and Attig

T.W.

(eds), Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy, Volume1: Understanding Human Emotions, pp. 89–96. Bowling Green, OH: The Applied Philosophy Program.

41.

Rydin

1999. ‘Can we talk ourselves into sustainability? The role of discourse in the environmental policy process’. Environmental Values 8: 467–484. CrossRef.

42.

Scarwell

H.-J.

, Kergomard

and Laganier

(eds). 2008. Environnement et gouver-nance des territoires. Enjeux, expériences et perspectives en région Nord-Pas de Calais. Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.

43.

Searle

1969. Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.

44.

Söderbaum

1999. ‘Values, ideology and politics in ecological economics’. Ecological Economics 28: 161–170. CrossRef.

45.

Spash

C.L.

2008. ‘How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the bio-diverse trail’. Environmental Values 17: 259–284. CrossRef.

46.

Tversky

and Kahneman

. 1981. ‘The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice’. Science, New Series, Vol. 211 No. 4481: 453–458.

47.

Vatn

2005. Institutions and the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

48.

Zuindeau

2007. ‘Territorial equity and sustainable development’. Environmental Values 16: 253–268. CrossRef.