Activities protesting against major polluters who cause climate change may cause damage to private property in the process. This paper investigates the case for a more international general basis of moral justification for such protests. Specific reference is made to the Kingsnorth case, which involved a protest by Greenpeace against coal-powered electricity generation in the UK. An appeal is made to Rawlsian fairness arguments, traditionally employed to support the obligation of citizens to their national governments as opposed to their international duties. The argument made here, however, is that there seem to be sufficient reasons for holding that a stable climate is one of the first truly global public goods that is indispensable to acceptable standards of living everywhere. This would suffice to justify international and intergenerational ‘atmospheric’ political obligations, which in turn may justify protests – even those causing some damage to private property – against the laws and policies that violate the fair terms of cooperation in providing a stable climate. The fairness argument aims also to provide a ground from which Green political theory could integrate accounts of radical forms of citizenship into appeals to state political authority. This leads to justifying acts of civil disobedience on the basis of novel understandings of ‘atmospheric’ citizenship obligations.
AEA.2012. Climate Impact of the Potential Shale Gas Production in EU. The Final Report. Accessible at: ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/eccp/docs/120815_final_report_en.pdf (accessed 22 April 2014).
2.
BaerP.2002. ‘Equity, greenhouse gas emissions, and the global common resources’. In SchneiderS.H., RosengrantzA. and NilesJ.O. (eds), Climate Change Policy: A Survey, pp. 393–408. Washington, DC: Island Press.
3.
BarryJ.2006. ‘Resistance is fertile: From environmental to sustainability citizenship’. In DobsonA. and BellD. (eds), Environmental Citizenship, pp. 21–48. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4.
BarryJ. and EckersleyR. (eds). 2005. The State and the Global Ecological Challenge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5.
BeitzC.1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BlakeM.2001. ‘Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs30 (3): 257–96. CrossRef.
7.
CarterA.1998. ‘In defence of radical disobedience’. Journal of Applied Philosophy15 (1): 29–47. CrossRef.
8.
ChristianoT.2008. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.
9.
CohenJ. and SabelC.. 2006. ‘Extra republicam nulla justicia?’ Philosophy & Public Affairs34 (2): 147–175. CrossRef.
10.
DaggerR.2005. ‘A duty to serve? Responsibility, reciprocity and the paradox of civic service’. Public Policy Research12 (1): 15–21. CrossRef.
11.
DobsonA.2003. Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.
12.
DobsonA.2006. ‘Citizenship’. In DobsonA. and EckersleyR. (eds), Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge, pp. 216–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
13.
DobsonA and BellD. (eds). 2006. Environmental Citizenship.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
14.
DowerN. and WilliamsJ. (eds). 2002. Global Citizenship. A Critical Introduction.New York: Routledge.
15.
EckersleyR.2004. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16.
EckersleyR.2005. ‘Greening the nation-state: From exclusive to inclusive sovereignty’. In BarryJ. and EckersleyR. (eds), The State and the Global Ecological Challenge, pp. 159–180. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
17.
HansenJ.E.2009. ‘Why America needs nuclear energy’. Video-recording, accessible at http://bigthink.com/ideas/17891 (accessed 22 April 2014).
MartinM.1990. ‘Ecosabotage and civil disobedience’. Environmental Ethics12 (4): 291–310. CrossRef.
30.
MeinshausenM, MeinshausenN., HareW., RaperS.C.B., FrielerK., KnuttiR., FrameD.J. and AllenM. R.. 2009. ‘Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C’. Nature458: 1158–1163. CrossRef.
31.
MillerD.1999. ‘Social justice and environmental goods’. In DobsonA. (ed.), Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice, pp. 151–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.
32.
NagelT.2005. ‘The problem of global justice’. Philosophy & Public Affairs33 (2): 113–147. CrossRef.
33.
PassmoreJ.1980. Man's Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions.London: Duckworth.
34.
PellikaanH. and van der VeenR.J.. 2002. Environmental Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
35.
PoggeT.W.1994. ‘An egalitarian Law of Peoples’. Philosophy & Public Affairs23 (3): 195–224. CrossRef.
36.
PoggeT.W.2008. World Poverty and Human Rights. Second Edition.Cambridge: Polity Press.
37.
RawlsJ.1972. A Theory of Justice.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
RawlsJ.1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
RawlsJ.1999a. ‘Legal obligation and the duty of fair play’. In FreemanS. (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers, pp. 117–129. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
RawlsJ.1999b. ‘The justification of civil disobedience’. In FreemanS. (ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers, as above, pp. 176–189.
41.
SangiovanniA.2007. ‘Global justice, reciprocity, and the state’. Philosophy & Public Affairs35 (1): 3–39. CrossRef.
42.
ScanlonT.1998. What We Owe to Each Other.Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
43.
SchlosbergD.2007. Defining Environmental Justice. Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.
44.
Shrader-FrechetteK.2002. Environmental Justice. Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
SimmonsA.J.2001. Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
SingerP.1973. Democracy and Disobedience.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
47.
StoreyT. and LidburyA.. 2009. Criminal Law: Fifth Edition. Devon: Willan.
48.
VanderheidenS.2008. Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
