Wildlife Gardening and Connectedness to Nature: Engaging the Unengaged

Abstract

An often overlooked impact of urbanisation is a reduction in our ability to connect with nature in our daily lives. If people lose the ability to connect with nature we run the risk of creating a nature-disconnect, which is hypothesised to have an impact on our empathy for other species and our desire to help conservation efforts. Understanding how a sense of connection with nature can impact upon people's decisions to seek out nature in their daily lives is important if we wish to encourage the practice of wildlife gardening as a tool to enhance both urban biodiversity and connectedness to nature. This study targeted members of wildlife gardening programmes (n=261) and members of the general public (n=417) and provides empirical evidence that connectedness to nature is a primitive belief, but also shows that a strong sense of connection with nature is not a prerequisite for engaging in wildlife gardening.

Keywords

Connectedness to nature wildlife gardening urban conservation urban wildlife biodiversity conservation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2007. 2006 Census QuickStats : Melbourne (Statistical Division). Canberra: ABS, www.abs.gov.au (accessed March 23, 2011).

Bartlett

M. S.

1954. ‘A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 16 (Series B): 296–298.

Bem

D. J.

1970. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Human Affairs. Belmont, California: Brooks-Cole.

Bunting

T. E.

and Cousins

L. R.

. 1985. ‘Environmental dispositions among school-age children: A preliminary investigation’. Environment and Behavior 17: 725–768. CrossRef.

Buczacki

2007. Garden Natural History. London: Harper Collins Publishers.

Canterbury City Council 2010. Wild about Gardens. Canterbury: Canterbury City Council, http://www.canterbury.gov.uk/main.cfm?objectid=418 (accessed June 24, 2010).

Chamberlain

D.E.

, Cannon

A.R.

and Toms

M.P.

. 2004. ‘Associations of garden birds with gradients in garden habitat and local habitat’. Ecography 27: 589–600. CrossRef.

Chawla

2002. ‘Spots of time: Manifold ways of being in nature in childhood’, in Kahn

P.H.J

and Kellert

S. R.

(eds.), Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural and Evolutionary Investigations (Cambridge: The MIT Press), pp. 199–225.

Chiesura

2004. ‘The role of urban parks for the sustainable city’. Landscape and Urban Planning 68(1): 129–138. CrossRef.

10.

Clayton

2003. ‘Environmental identity: a conceptual and operational definition’, in Clayton

and Opotow

(eds.), Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, pp. 45–65. Cambridge: MIT Press.

11.

Clayton

2007. ‘Domesticated nature; Motivations for gardening and perceptions of environmental impact’. Journal of Environmental Pyschology 27: 215–224. CrossRef.

12.

Clayton

and Opotow

. 2003. Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.

13.

Cohen

1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

14.

Collinge

S. K.

1996. ‘Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning’. Landscape and Urban Planning 36(1): 59–77. CrossRef.

15.

Cowie

R.J.

and Hinsley

S.A.

. 1988. ‘The provision of food and the use of bird feeders in suburban gardens’. Bird Study 35: 163–168. CrossRef.

16.

Davies

and Webber

. 2004. ‘Enjoying Our Backyard Buddies – Social Research Informing the Practice of Mainstream Community Education for the Conservation of Urban Wildife’. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 20(1): 77–87.

17.

Davies

Z. G.

, Fuller

R.A.

, Loram

, Irvine

K.N.

, Sims

and Gaston

K.J.

. 2009. ‘A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens’. Biological Conservation 142(4): 761–771. CrossRef.

18.

Department for Environment and Heritage 2008. Backyards for Wildlife. Adelaide: Department for Environment and Heritage, http://www.backyards4wildlife.com.au/index.php?page=backyards-4-wildlife (accessed June 24, 2010).

19.

Frantz

, Mayer

F.S.

, Norton

and Rock

. 2005. ‘There is no ‘I’ in nature: The influence of self-awareness on connectedness to nature’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25(4): 427–436. CrossRef.

20.

French

, Major

and Hely

. 2005. ‘Use of native and exotic garden plants by suburban nectarivorous birds’. Biological Conservation 121: 545–559. CrossRef.

21.

Gaston

K.J.

, Warren

P.H.

, Thompson

and Smith

R.M.

. 2005. ‘Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features’. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2249–3327. CrossRef.

22.

Gaston

K.J.

, Fuller

R.A.

, Loram

, MacDonald

, Power

and Dempsey

. 2007. ‘Urban domestic gardens (XI): variation in urban wildlife gardening in the UK’. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 3227–3238. CrossRef.

23.

Hartig

, Mang

and Evans

G.W.

. 1991. ‘Restorative effects of natural environment experiences’. Environment and Behaviour 23: 3–26. CrossRef.

24.

Hinds

and Sparks

. 2008. ‘Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28(2): 109–120. CrossRef.

25.

Horwitz

W. A.

1996. ‘Development origins of environmental ethics: The life experience of activists’. Ethics and Behavior 6: 29–54. CrossRef.

26.

Kahn

P. H.

1997. ‘Developmental Psychology and the Biophilia Hypothesis: Children's Affiliation with Nature’. Developmental Review 17(1): 1–61. CrossRef.

27.

Kahn

1999. The Human Relationship With Nature: Development and Culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

28.

Kahn

P. H. J.

2002. ‘Children's affiliations with nature: Structure, development and the problem of environmental generational amnesia’, in Kahn

P.H.J

and Kellert

S. R.

(eds.), Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural and Evolutionary Investigations (Cambridge: The MIT Press), pp. 94–116.

29.

Kaiser

1970. A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika 35: 401–415. CrossRef.

30.

Kaiser

1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39: 31–36. CrossRef.

31.

Kellert

S. R.

2002. ‘Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children’, in Kahn

P.H.J

and Kellert

S. R.

(eds.), Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural and Evolutionary Investigations (Cambridge: The MIT Press), pp. 117–151.

32.

Kiesling

F. M.

and Manning

C. M.

, 2010. ‘How green is your thumb? Environmental gardening identity and ecological gardening practices’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30: 315–327. CrossRef.

33.

Kihlstrom

J. F.

, Eich

, Sandbrand

and Tobias

B. A.

. 2000. ‘Emotion and Memory: Implications for Self-Report’, in Stone

, Turkkan

J. S.

, Bachrach

C. A.

, Jobe

J. B.

, Kurtzman

H. S.

, and Cain

V. S.

(eds.), The Science of Self-Report: Implications for Research and Practice, pp. 81–99. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

34.

Knox City Council 2010. Gardens for Wildlife. Melbourne: Knox City Council, http://www.knox.vic.gov.au/Page/page.asp?Page_Id=880&h=1 (accessed June 24, 2010).

35.

Krosnick

J. A.

1999. ‘Survey Research’. Annual Review of Psychology 50:537–67. CrossRef.

36.

Luck

2008. Conserving Backyard Biodiversity. Science Alert, http://www.sci-encealert.com.au/opinions/20081504–17185.html (accessed 16 April2008).

37.

Leather

, Pyrgas

, Beale

and Lawrence

. 1998. ‘Windows in the workplace’. Environment and Behaviour 30: 739–763. CrossRef.

38.

Lepczyk

C.A.

, Mertug

A.G.

and Liu

. 2004. ‘Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes’. Environmental Management 33: 110–125. CrossRef.

39.

Mayer

F. S.

and Frantz

C.M.

. 2004. ‘The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(4): 503–515. CrossRef.

40.

Miller

K. K.

, Brown

P.R.

and Temby

. 1999. ‘Attitudes Towards Possums: a Need for Education?’. The Victorian Naturalist 116(4): 7.

41.

National Wildlife Federation 2010. Garden for Wildlife. Washington: National WildlifeFederation, http://www.nwf.org/Get-Outside/Outdoor-Activities/Garden-for-Wildlife.aspx (accessed June 24, 2010).

42.

Neuman

W. L.

2000. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

43.

New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service 2002. Urban wildlife renewal - Growing conservation in urban communities. Research commission. Australia: Woolcott Research Pty Ltd.

44.

Orr

D. W.

2002. ‘Political economy and the ecology of childhood’, in Kahn

P.H.J

and Kellert

S. R.

(eds.), Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural and Evolutionary Investigations (Cambridge: The MIT Press), pp. 279–303.

45.

Parsons

, Tassinary

L.G.

, Ulrich

R.S.

, Hebl

M.R.

and Grossman-Alexander

. 1998. ‘The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunization’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18(2): 113–140. CrossRef.

46.

Perrin

J. L.

and Benassi

V.A.

, 2009. ‘The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature?’ Journal of Environmental Psychology 29: 434–440. CrossRef.

47.

Rohde

C. L. E.

and Kendle

A.D.

. 1997. ‘Nature for people’, in Kendle

and Forbes

(eds.), Urban Nature Conservation: Landscape Management in the Urban Countryside (London: E&FN SPON), pp. 319–335.

48.

Rokeach

1968. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.

49.

Roszak

1995. ‘Where psyche meet Gaia’, in Roszak

, Gomes

M. E.

and Kanner

A. D.

(eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, Healing the Mind(San Francisco: Sierra Club Books).

50.

Rudd

, Vala

and Schaefer

. 2002. ‘Importance of Backyard Habitat in a Comprehensive Biodiversity Conservation Strategy: A Connectivity Analysis of Urban Green Spaces’. Restoration Ecology 10(2): 368–375. CrossRef.

51.

Sax

L.J.

, Gilmartin

S.K.

and Bryant

A.N.

. 2003. ‘Assessing response rates and non-response bias in web and paper surveys’. Research in Higher Education 44(4): 409–432. CrossRef.

52.

Schultz

P.W.

2002. ‘Inclusion with nature: Understanding human nature interactions’, in Schmuck

and Schultz

P.W.

(eds.), The Psychology of Sustainable Development (New York: Kluwer), pp. 61–78. CrossRef.

53.

Schultz

P.W.

and Tabanico

. 2007. ‘Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 37(6): 1219–1247. CrossRef.

54.

Sullivan

W. C.

, Kuo

F.E.

and DePooter

. 2004. ‘The fruit of urban nature: vital neighbourhood spaces’. Environment and Behaviour 36: 678–700. CrossRef.

55.

Thompson

P.S.

, Greenwood

J.J.D.

and Greenaway

. 1993. ‘Birds in European gardens in the winter and spring of 1988–89’. Bird Study 40: 120–134. CrossRef.

56.

Ulrich

R. S.

and Addoms

. 1981. ‘Psychological and recreational functions of a residential park’. Journal of Leisure Research 13: 43–65.

57.

United Nations 2007, Urban and Rural Areas 2007. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wup2007/2007_urban_rural_chart.pdf (accessed 20 July 2011).

58.

White

Jr . 1967. ‘The historical roots of our ecologic crisis’. Science 155: 1203–1207. CrossRef.

59.

Wilson

E. O.

1984. Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

60.

Wilson

E. O.

1993. ‘Biophilia and the conservation ethic’, in Kellert

S. R.

and Wilson

E. O.

(eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis (Washington, D.C.: Island Press), pp. 31–41.

61.

Zagorski

, Kirkpatrick

J.B.

and Stratford

. 2004. ‘Gardens and the bush: Gardeners’ attitudes, garden types and invasives’. Australian Geographic Studies 42(2): 207–220.