Concern with ethical anthropocentrism has largely been confined to debates in animal and environmental ethics. Philosophers generally have shown little interest in it. Ethical egoism, by contrast, though usually rejected, has sparked wide philosophical interest. This is surprising, for the two are akin; anthropo-centrism is egoism writ large – the egoism of the human species. This paper explains the kinship by articulating this analogy, shows that the analogy provides for each argument for or against ethical egoism an analogous argument for or against ethical anthropocentrism, and demonstrates the analogy's fruit-fulness by using it to extrapolate from an existing argument against ethical egoism a novel argument against ethical anthropocentrism.
GauthierD. P.1970. Morality and Rational Self-Interest. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
GoodpasterK.1979. ‘From egoism to environmentalism’, in Goodpaster and Sayre (1979: 21–35).
13.
GoodpasterK. E. and SayreK. M. (eds.) 1979. Ethics and Problems of the 21st Century. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
14.
GrauC.2010. ‘Moral status, speciesism, and Liao's genetic account’. Journal of Moral Philosophy7: 387–96. CrossRef.
15.
KalinJ.1970. ‘In defense of egoism’, in Gauthier (1970: 64–87).
16.
KorsgaardC.2004. ‘The myth of egoism’, in BaumannP. and BetzlerM. (eds). Practical Conflicts: New Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
17.
LiaoS. M.2010. ‘The basis of human moral status’. Journal of Moral Philosophy7: 159–79. CrossRef.
18.
MachanTibor R.2004. Putting Humans First: Why We Are Nature's Favorite. Lanhan: Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
McConnellT. C.1978. ‘The Argument from psychological egoism to ethical egoism’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy56: 41–47. CrossRef.
20.
McMahanJ.2005. ‘Our fellow creatures’. Journal of Ethics9: 353–80. CrossRef.
21.
MedlinB.1970. ‘Ultimate principles and ethical egoism’, in Gauthier (1970: 56–63).
22.
NietzscheF.1881. Daybreak, ClarkM. and LeiterB., trans, 1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
NoltJ.2006. ‘The move from good to ought in environmental ethics’. Environmental Ethics28(4): 355–374. CrossRef.
24.
NoltJ.2009. ‘The move from is to good in environmental ethics’. Environmental Ethics31(2): 135–154.
25.
NortonB.1984. ‘Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism’. Environmental Ethics6(2): 131–148; reprinted in LightA. and RolstonH. (eds). 2003. Environmental Ethics: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.
26.
NortonB. G.2005. Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef.
27.
O'NeillJ.2001. ‘Meta-ethics’, in JamiesonD. (ed.) A Companion to Environmental Philosophy, pp. 163–176. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossRef.
28.
QuinnW.1974. ‘Egoism as an ethical system’. Journal of Philosophy71(14): 456–472. CrossRef.
29.
RachelsJ.1986. ‘Egoism and moral skepticism’, in SommersC. and FogelinR. (eds.) Right and Wrong: Basic Readings in Ethics, pp. 179–192. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
30.
RachelsJ.1993. The Elements of Moral Philosophy, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
RegisE.1980. ‘What is ethical egoism?’. Ethics91(1): 50–62. CrossRef.
32.
RoutleyR. and RoutleyV. [1970]. ‘Against the inevitabilty of human chauvinism’, in Goodpaster and Sayre (1979), pp. 38–59.
33.
Shaffer-LandauR.2010. The Fundamentals of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SmithM.2003. ‘Neutral and relative value after Moore’. Ethics113: 576–598. CrossRef.
36.
SteinerG.2005. Anthropocentrism and its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
