Environmental functions are defined as the possible uses of the non-human-made physical surroundings on which humanity is entirely dependent. Competing functions are by definition economic goods, indeed the most fundamental humanity disposes of. Environmental sustainability is defined as the dynamic equilibrium by which vital environmental functions remain available for future generations. Environmentally sustainable national income (eSNI) is defined as the maximum attainable production level by which vital environmental functions remain available for future generations. Thus the eSNI provides information about the distance between the current and a sustainable situation. In combination with the standard national income (NI), the eSNI indicates whether the part of the production that is not based on sustainable use of the environment is increasing or decreasing in the course of time. Calculation of the eSNI involves the use of environmental models and a static general economic equilibrium model. It is shown that asymmetric entries are obscuring what is happening with both environment and production and that there is no conflict between employment and safeguarding the environment.
(Most articles by the present author can be downloaded fromwww.sni-hueting.info).
2.
BouldingK.1991. ‘What do we want to sustain? Environmentalism and human evaluations’. In CostanzaR. (ed.) Ecological Economics.Columbia University Press.
3.
BrownL.R., FlavinC. and FrenchH.. 1998. State of the World 1998. New York: W.W. Norton.
4.
BrouwerR. and O'ConnorM. (eds.) 1997. Final Project Report: Methodological Problems in the Calculation of Environmentally Adjusted National Income Figures, Research Report for the European Commission DG-XII, Contract EV5V-CT94-0363.
5.
BrundtlandG.H. et al. (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DalyH.1973. Toward a Steady State Economy. San Francisco: Freeman.
8.
De HaanM.2004. Accounting for Goods and for Bads. Statistics Netherlands.
9.
GoodlandR.1995. ‘The concept of environmental sustainability’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics26:1–24. CrossRef.
10.
HeertjeA.2006. Echte economie, p. 138. Nijmegen: Valkhof Pers.
11.
HuetingR.1969. Functions of Nature: Should Nature Be Quantified?London: World Wildlife Fund.
12.
HuetingR.1974. New Scarcity and Economic Growth, More Welfare through Less Production? Dutch edition: Agon Elsevier. (English edition, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1980).
13.
HuetingR.1981. Some Comments on the Report A Low Energy Strategy for the United Kingdom, compiled by Leach G. et al. for the International Institute for Environment and Development. Paper prepared for the working party on Integral Energy Scenarios, Den Haag.
14.
HuetingR.1987. ‘An economic scenario that gives top priority to saving the environment’. Ecological Modelling38(1/2): 123–140. CrossRef.
15.
HuetingR.1989. ‘Correcting national income for environmental losses: towards a practical solution’. In AhmadY., El SerafyS. and LutzE. (eds.), Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development, pp. 32–39. Washington: The World Bank.
16.
HuetingR.1990. ‘The Brundtland Report: A matter of conflicting goals’. Ecological Economics2: 109–117. CrossRef.
17.
HuetingR.1991. ‘The use of the discount rate in a cost-benefit analysis for different uses of a humid tropical forest area’. Ecological Economics3(1): 43–57. CrossRef.
18.
HuetingR.1992. ‘The economic functions of the environment’. In EkinsP. and Max-NeefM. (eds.), Real-life Economics, pp. 61–9. London, New York: Routledge.
19.
HuetingR.1996. ‘Three persistent myths in the environmental debate’. Ecological Economics18: 81–88. CrossRef.
20.
HuetingR., BoschP. and De BoerB.. 1992. Methodology for the Calculation of a Sustainable National Income. Statistics Netherlands, Statistical Essays, M 44. The Hague: SDU Publishers. Also published as WWF International report, Gland, Switzerland, June 1992.
21.
HuetingR. and De BoerB.. 2001. ‘Environmental valuation and sustainable national income according to Hueting’. In Van IerlandE.C. (eds.), Economic Growth and Valuation of the Environment: A Debate, pp. 17–77. London: Edward Elgar.
22.
HuetingR. and ReijndersL.. 1998. ‘Sustainability is an objective concept’. Ecological Economics27: 139–147.
23.
IUCN.1980. The World Conservation Strategy. Gland (Switzerland): WWF/IUCN.
24.
KappK.W.1963 (second edition; first edition 1950). The Social Costs of Private Enterprise. London: Asia Publishing House.
25.
MillJ.S.1876. Principles of Political Economy. London.
26.
PearceD., HamiltonK. and AtkinsonG.. 2001. ‘Valuing Nature’. In Van IerlandE.C., (eds.) Economic Growth and Valuation of the Environment: A Debate, pp. 17–77. London: Edward Elgar.
27.
ReijndersL.1996. Environmentally Improved Production Processes and Products. Dordtrecht: Kluwer Scientific Publishers. CrossRef.
TinbergenJ. and HuetingR.. 1991. ‘GNP and Market Prices: Wrong Signals for Sustainable Economic Success that Mask Environmental Destruction’. In GoodlandR., DalyH., El SerafyS. and Von DrosteB. (eds.), Environmentally Sustainable Economic Development: Building on Brundtland. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Also published in R. Goodland et al. (eds.) 1992, Population, Technology and Lifestyle, The Transition to Sustainability. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and UNESCO. Also published in R. Goodland et al. (eds.) 1991, Environmentally Sustainable Economic Development: Building on Brundtland. Environment Working Paper No 46. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
30.
United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Bank.2003. Handbook of National Accounting – Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003 (SEEA).New York.
31.
VerbruggenH., DellinkR.B., GerlachR., HofkesM.W. and JansenH.M.A.. 2001. ‘Alternative calculations of a sustainable national income for the Netherlands according to Hueting’. In Van IerlandE.C. (eds.), Economic Growth and Valuation of the Environment: A Debate, pp. 275–312. London: Edward Elgar.
