The principle of sustainability contains two objectives of justice regarding the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation (‘intragenerational justice'); (2) justice between people of different generations (‘intergenerational justice'). Three hypotheses about their relationship – independency, facilitation and rivalry – are held in the political and scientific sustainability discourse. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis to important political documents and the scientific literature, we reveal six determinants underlying the different hypotheses: quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.
AdamsW.M., AvelingR., BrockingtonD., DicksonB., ElliottJ., HuttonJ., RoeD., ViraB. and WolmerW.2004. ‘Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty’. Science306: 1146–1149.
2.
Aristotle1998. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated with an introduction by RossW.D., revised by AcrillJ.L. and UrmsonJ.O.. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
ArrowK.J.. 2004. ‘Are we consuming too much?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives18(3): 147–172.
4.
AtkinsonG, DubourgR., HamiltonK. and MunasingheM.1997. Measuring Sustainable Development: Macroeconomics and the Environment.Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
5.
AttfieldR.1998. ‘Saving nature, feeding people, and ethics’. Environmental Values7: 291–304.
6.
BartelmusP.1994. Environment, Growth and Development: The Concepts and Strategies of Sustainable Development.London: Routledge.
7.
BeckerC.2009. SustainabilityEthics andSustainabilityResearch. Habilitation Thesis, Technical University of Kaiserslautern.
8.
BeitzC.1979. Political Theory and International Relations.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
CostanzaR., CumberlandJ., DalyH., GoodlandR. and NorgaardR.1997a. An Introduction to Ecological Economics.Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press.
10.
CostanzaR.. 1997b. ‘The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital’. Nature387: 253–260.
11.
DalyH.E. and CobbJ.B.1989. For the Common Good. Boston: Beacon Press.
12.
DobsonA.1998. Justice and the Environment. Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice.New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
EkinsP.1993. ‘Making development sustainable’. In SachsW. (ed.), Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict, pp. 91–103. London: Zed Books.
14.
EkinsP., SimonS., DeutschL., FolkeC. and de GrootR.2003. ‘A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability’. Ecological Economics44(2), 165–185.
15.
ElsasserP.2002. ‘Rules for participation and negotiation and their possible influence on the content of a national forest programme’. Forest Policy and Economics4(4): 291–300.
16.
FeinbergJ.1981. ‘The rights of animals and unborn generations’. In PartridgeE. (ed.), Responsibilities to Future Generations.New York: Prometheus Books.
17.
GoodlandR.J.A.1992. Population, Technology, and Lifestyle: the Transition to Sustainability.Washington DC: Island Press.
18.
HanleyN., ShogrenJ.F. and WhiteB.2006. Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice, 2nd edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
HarrisonP.1992. The Third Revolution: Population, Environment and a Sustainable World.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
20.
HaydenP.2002. John Rawls: Towards a Just World Order.Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
21.
HelmC. and SimonisU.E.2001. ‘Distributive justice in international environmental policy: axiomatic foundation and exemplary formulation’. Environmental Values10: 5–18.
22.
HollingC.S. and WalkerB.2003). Resilience defined. In NeumayerE. (ed.), Online Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics.www.ecoeco.org/education_encyclopedia.php (accessed June 24, 2009).
23.
HumeD.1975. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by NidditchP.A. and Selby-BiggeL.A., 3rd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
24.
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ed.)2007. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaption, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group 2 to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Kantl. 1949. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals. Translated by AbbottT. K.. Prentice Hall.
26.
KopfmüllerJ., BrandlV. and JörissenJ.2001. Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet. Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren.Berlin: Edition sigma.
27.
LangeA., LöschelA., VogtC. and ZieglerA.2010. ‘On the self-interested use of equity in international climate negotiations’. European Economic Review54(3): 359–375.
28.
LanghelleO.2000. ‘Sustainable development and social justice. Expanding the Rawlsian framework of global justice’. Environmental Values9: 295–323.
29.
LeistA.2005. Ökologische Ethik II: Ökologische Gerechtigkeit: Global, intergenerationell und humanökologisch. In Nida-RümelinJ. (ed.), Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung. Ein Handbuch. Stuttgart.
30.
MayringP.2000. ‘Qualitative content analysis’. Forum Qualitative Social Research1(2), Art. 20.
31.
MEA – Millennium Ecosystem Assessment2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: a Framework for Assessment.Washington DC: Island Press.
32.
MEA – Millennium Ecosystem Assessment2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis.Washington DC: Island Press and World Resources Institute.
33.
NeefjesK.1999. ‘Ecological degradation: A cause of conflict, a concern for survival’. In DobsonA. (ed.), Fairness and Futurity. Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice.New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
NorgaardR.B. and HallD.C.1974. ‘Environmental amenity rights, transaction costs, and technological change’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management1: 251–267.
35.
NozickR.1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Oxford: Blackwell.
36.
OttK. and DöringR.2004. Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis.
37.
PearceD., MarkandyaA. and BarbierE.1989. Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan.
38.
PermanR., MaY., McGilvrayJ. and CommonM.2003. Natural Resource and Environmental Economics, 3rd edition. Harlow: Pearson.
39.
PoggeT.W.1989. RealizingRawls.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
40.
RandallA.1972. ‘Market solutions to externality problems: theory and practice’. American Journal of Agricultural Economics54: 175–183.
41.
RawlsJ.1973 [1971]. A Theory of Justice, 6th printing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
42.
RoemerJ.E.1996. Theories of Distributive Justice.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
43.
RoemerJ.E.2007: ‘Intergenerational justice and sustainability under the leximin ethic’. In RoemerJ., and SuzumuraK. (eds.), Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability.Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave. 203–227.
44.
RuijsA., DellinkR.B. and BromleyD.W.2008. ‘Economics of poverty, environment and natural resource-use’. In RuijsA. and DellinkR.B. (eds.), Economics of Poverty, Environment and Natural Resource-Use.Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
45.
SachsW.2001. Nach uns die Zukunft: Der globale Konflikt um Gerechtigkeit und Ökologie.Frankfurt a. M.: Brandes and Apsel.
46.
SchlosbergD.2004. ‘Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theorists’. Environmental Politics13: 517–540.
47.
SenA.1982. Choice, Welfare and Measurement.Oxford: Blackwell.
48.
SorrellS.2007. The Rebound Effect: An Assessment of the Evidence for Economy-Wide Energy Savings from Improved Energy Efficiency.UK Energy Research Centre, October 2007.
49.
Stoll-KleemannS.2005. ‘Indicators and evaluation of sustainable natural resource management and governance in biosphere reserves’. In UNESCO (ed.), Global Change Impacts in Mountain Biosphere Reserves, pp. 237–245. Paris.
50.
SukhdevP. and KumarP.2008. Interim Report: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity.Wesseling: European Communities.
51.
ThompsonJ.1992. ‘Development and environmentalism’. In AttfieldR. and WilkinsB. (eds.), International Justice and the Third World. London: Routledge.
52.
TremmelJ.2008. A Theory of Intergenerational Justice. PhD Thesis, University of Düsseldorf.
53.
UN - United Nations General Assembly1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A/RES/217, UN-Doc. 217/A-(III).
54.
UN – United Nations General Assembly1992. Convention on Biological Diversity.Rio de Janeiro.
55.
UN - United Nations General Assembly2002. Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa, 26. August - 4 September 2002.New York.
56.
UN/DESA - United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development1992. Agenda 21: Earth Summit - The United Nations Program of Action from Rio.New York.
57.
UN/DESA - United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs2005. World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision.New York.
58.
VatnA.2005. Institutions and the Environment.Northampton: Edward Elgar.
59.
Visser't HooftH.P.2007. Justice to Future Generations and the Environment.Berlin and New York: Springer.
60.
Von WeizsäckerE.U., LovinsA. and LovinsH.1995. Factor Four: Doubling Wealth, Halving Resource Use -A Report to the Club of Rome.München.
WBGU – German Advisory Council on Global Change2004. World in Transition: Fighting Poverty through Environmental Policy.London: Earthscan.
63.
WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development1987. Our Common Future.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
WRI – World Resources Institute, in collaboration with United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme, and World Bank2008. World Resources 2008: Roots ofResilience – Growing the Wealth of the Poor.Washington, DC: WRI.
