Wild horses are becoming dependent on transitional environments between domesticity and wildness. In Dutch new nature areas they are learning to perform roles as ecological surrogates for their extinct ancestors. In the U.S. wild horses are ‘feral’ and exist in numbers deemed to be in excess of the carrying capacity of semi-arid public range lands. The federal government is removing and relocating thousands to long-term holding pastures. The capabilities approach of Nussbaum (2006) allows us to evaluate this transitional environment against a threshold of opportunities to exercise capabilities judged to be central to their flourishing as wild horses.
Bureau of Land Management2009. Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range Territory Environmental Assessment and Herd Management Area Plan.Billings, MT: Billings Field Office.
2.
Bureau of Land Management2010. www.blm.gov. Accessed 10 Dec. 2010.
3.
BrandtK.2004. ‘A language of their own: an interactionist approach to horse-human communication’. Society & Animals12(4): 299–316.
4.
ChildM.F.2011. ‘Conservation of adaptive self-construction: a flux-centred solution to the paradox of nature preservation’. Environmental Values20(4): 527–548.
5.
FeistJ.D. and McCulloughD.R.1976. ‘Behavior patterns and communication in feral horses’. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie41: 337–371.
6.
GamborgC., GremmenB., ChristiansenS.B. and SandoeP.2010. ‘De-domestication: ethics at the intersection of landscape restoration and animal welfare’. Environmental Values19: 57–78.
7.
KeulartzJ.2009a. ‘Boundary work in ecological restoration’. Environmental Philosophy6: 35–55.
8.
KeulartzJ.2009b. ‘Animal flourishing in an era of global change’. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Joint ISEE/IAEP Meeting. www.environmentalphilosophy.org. Accessed 10 Dec. 2010.
9.
KlaverI., KeulartzJ., BeltH.V.D. and GremmenB.2002. ‘Born to be wild: a pluralistic ethics concerning introduced large herbivores’. Environmental Ethics24(1): 3–21.
10.
NussbaumM.C.2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
PalmerC.2010. Animal Ethics in Context. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
12.
PomeranzL.2006. Among Wild Horses: A Portrait of the Pryor Mountain Mustangs.North Adams, MA: Storey Publishing.
ReedC.M.2008. ‘Wild horse protection policies: environmental and animal ethics in transition’. International Journal of Public Administration31: 1–10.
15.
ReedC.M.2010. ‘Grass roots on the public range: local efforts to preserve wild horse herds’. Presentation at the 2010 Western Social Science Association Conference.
RolstonH.1989. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
19.
SwartJ.A.A.2005. ‘Care for the wild: an integrative view on wild and domesticated animals’. Environmental Values14: 251–263.
20.
SwartJ.A.A.2009. ‘Towards an epistemology of place’. In DrenthenM., KeulartzJ. and ProctorJ. (eds.), New Visions of Nature (Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.).
