In this paper I examine the controversy over genetically modified canola (GM canola) in Australia as an ontological politics, drawing on recent work in Science and Technology Studies that extends actor-network theory and its commitment to the contingency of reality. I examine three different and overlapping performances of GM canola: as an agronomic object, a risk object and a market object. I focus on how each performance effects similarities and differences between GM and conventional canola that are productive of ontological distinctions that make GM canola controversial. I argue this analysis offers useful insights that are not revealed by more traditional explanations of controversy.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).2001. News for Business: Genetically Modified Organisms and Food, Canberra Australia: Commonwealth of Australia, http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index/phtml/itemld/306404 (accessed 12 December 2007).
Australian Oilseeds Federation, PA. Salisbury and T.D. Potter.1999. ‘Marketing’, in SalisburyPA., PotterT.D., McDonaldG. and GreenAG. (eds.), Canola in Australia: The First Thirty Years, pp. 75–84. Canberra, Australia: The Organising Committee of the 10th Annual Rapeseed Congress.
6.
BaumM., LagudahE.S. and AppelsR.. 1992. ‘Wide crosses in cereals’. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology43: 117–143.
7.
BinghamNick. 2006. ‘Bees, butterflies, and bacteria: biotechnology and the politics of nonhuman friendship’. Environment and Planning A38: 483–498.
8.
BinghamNick. 2008. ‘Slowing things down: lessons from the GM controversy’. Geoforum39(1): 111–122.
9.
BinghamNick and HinchliffeSteve. 2008. ‘Mapping the multiplicities of biosecurity’, in LakoffA. and CollierS. (eds.), Biosecurity Interventions, pp. 173–193. New York: Social Science research Council/Columbia University Press.
10.
BoltA.2004. ‘Safe, good, banned’ Herald Sun, April 2.
ClarkeAdrienne. 2004. ‘Universities can do more to inform technology debate’. UniNews13(22) www.unimelb.edu.au (accessed 19 November 2007).
13.
Codex Alimentarius Commission.2009. Report of the Thirty-Seventh Session of the Codex Committee on Food Labelling, Calgary, Canada, 4–8 May 2009, http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/archives.jsp?year=09 (accessed 18 February 2010).
14.
DastonLorraine. 2000. Biographies of Scientific Objects.Chicago: Chicago University Press.
15.
DowneyKeith R.2002. ‘Foreword’, in SalisburyP.A. and DowneyK.R., Genetically Modified Canola in Australia: Agronomic and Environmental Considerations, p. 5. Canberra Australia: Australian Oilseeds Federation.
Gibson-GrahamJ.K.2008. ‘Diverse economies: performative practices for “Other Worlds”’. Progress in Human Geography32(5): 613–632.
20.
GreenA.G. and SalisburyP.A.. ‘Transgenic canola’, in SalisburyP.A., PotterT.D., McDonaldG. and GreenA.G. (eds.), Canola in Australia: The First Thirty Years, pp. 41–44. Canberra, Australia: The Organising Committee of the 10th Annual Rapeseed Congress.
HigginsVaughan and LawrenceGeioffrey (eds.) 2005. Agricultural Governance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation.London and New York: Routledge.
23.
JasanoffS.2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States.Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
24.
LarkinP.J. and ScowcroftW.R.. 1981. ‘Somoclonal Variation – a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement’, Theoretical and Applied Genetics60: 197–214.
25.
LatourBruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern.Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
LatourBruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Science into Democracy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
LawJohn. 2002. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28.
LawJohn. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research.London and New York: Routledge.
29.
Le HeronRichard. 2007. ‘Globalisation, governance and post-structural political economy: Perspectives from Australasia’. Asia Pacific Viewpoint48: 26–40.
30.
Le HeronRichard and LewisNick. 2009. ‘Discussion: Theorising food regimes: intervention as politics’. Agriculture and Human Values26: 345–349.
31.
LemerleDeirdre, BlackshawRobert, PotterTrent, MarcroftStephen, Barrett-LennardRobert, . 1999. ‘Incidence of weeds in canola crops across Southern Australia’, 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra Australia http://www.regional.org.au/au/gcirc/6/700.htm (accessed 15 February 2010).
32.
LezaunJavier. 2006. ‘Creating anew object of government: making genetically modified organisms traceable’. Social Studies of Science36(4): 499–531.
LockieStewart and SalemNell. 2005. ‘Mobilizing “the consumer” within genetically modified and organic food networks’, in HigginsV. and LawrenceG. (eds.), Agricultural Governance: Globalization and the new politics of regulation, pp. 153–168. London and New York: Routledge.
35.
MichaelMike. 1996. Constructing Identities: The Social, The Non-Human and Change.London: Sage.
MolAnnemarie. 1999. ‘Ontological politics: a word and some questions’, in LawJohn and HasardsJohn (eds.), Actor Network Theory and After, pp. 74–89. Oxford and Keele: Blackwell and the Sociological Review.
38.
MolAnnemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice.Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Ingeborg MyhrAnne. 2010. ‘The challenge of scientific uncertainty and disunity in risk assessment and management of GM crops’. Environmental Values19: 7–31.
NortonR.M. and RoushR.T.. 2007. Canola and Australian Farming Systems.Melbourne Australia: The University of Melbourne, www.jcci.unimelb.edu.au/Canola2007.pdf (accessed 15 February 2010).
Office of the Gene Technology Regulator.2003. Risk Analysis and Risk Management Plan, General Release of Roundup Ready Canola (Brassica napus) in Australia, DIR 020/2002, Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government, www.ogtr.gov.au (accessed 20 October 2007).
46.
Organic Federation of Australia Ltd.2007. Submission to the Review of the Genetically Modified Crops Act 2004, http://www.ofa.org.au/papers_menu.html (accessed 21 December 2007).
47.
RiegerMary A., LamondM., PrestonC., PowlesS.B. and RoushR.T.. 2002. ‘Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields’. Science, 296(5577): 2386–2388 (28 June).
SalisburyP.A., PotterT.D., McDonaldG. and GreenA.G. (eds.) 1999. Canola in Australia: The First Thirty Years.Canberra, Australia: The Organising Committee of the 10th Annual Rapeseed Congress.
52.
SalisburyPhillip A. and DowneyKeith R.. 2002. Genetically Modified Canola in Australia: Agronomic and Environmental Considerations.Canberra Australia: Australian Oilseeds Federation.
53.
SutherlandS.1999. ‘Weed management’, in SalisburyP.A., PotterT.D., McDonaldG. and GreenA.G. (eds.), Canola in Australia: The First Thirty Years, pp. 59–66. Canberra, Australia: The Organising Committee of the 10th Annual Rapeseed Congress.
