Henry David Thoreau, though often characterised as individualist or apolitical, is in fact an important link between Jeffersonian agrarian republicanism and environmentalism. Like the Jeffersonians, Thoreau espouses a political economy of citizenship, criticises modern capitalism, and celebrates simplicity and personal independence. However, Thoreau rejects the Jeffersonians’ focus on conquest of the wilderness and economic industriousness, both of which were meant to promote virtue. Thoreau advocates preservation of wild nature as essential for cultivating virtue and regards nature as a community deserving respect and protection. He criticises an emphasis on economic industriousness as promoting overwork, environmental destruction and greed. Thoreau emerges as a complex figure whose legacy points in two contrasting directions: toward a more ecologically responsible or sustainable republicanism embracing preservation of a spectrum of landscapes from wilderness to agrarian, and also toward a problematic, depoliticising separation between human beings and nature.
AndersonD.2000. ‘Wild farming’, in ThompsonP. and HildeT. (eds.), The Agrarian Roots of Pragmatism (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press), pp. 153–163.
2.
BailynB.1992. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3.
BanningL.1978. The Jeffersonian Persuasion.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
4.
BarryJ.1999. Rethinking Green Politics.London: Sage.
5.
BarryJ.2006. ‘Resistance is fertile’, in DobsonA. and BellD. (eds.), Environmental Citizenship (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 21–48.
6.
BarryJ. and SmithK.2008. ‘Civic republicanism and green politics’, in LeightonD. and WhiteS. (eds.), Building a Citizen Society (London: Lawrence and Wishart), pp. 137–147.
BuellL.1995. The Environmental Imagination.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9.
CafaroP.2005. ‘Thoreau, Leopold, and Carson’, in SandlerR. and CafaroP. (eds.), Environmental Virtue Ethics (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield), pp. 31–44.
10.
CafaroP.2006. Thoreau's Living Ethics.Athens: University of Georgia Press.
11.
CannavòP.2010. ‘To the thousandth generation’. Environmental Politics, 19(3): 356–373.
12.
ChaloupkaW.2009. ‘Thoreau's apolitical legacy for American environmentalism’, in TurnerJ. (ed.), A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky), pp. 205–226.
13.
CrononW.1995. ‘The trouble with wilderness’, in CrononW. (ed.), Uncommon Ground (New York: W.W. Norton), pp. 69–90.
14.
CurryP.2000. ‘Redefining community’. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9(8): 1059–1071.
15.
DobsonA.2003. Citizenship and the Environment.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
DobsonA.2006. ‘Citizenship’, in DobsonA. and EckersleyR. (eds.), Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 216–231.
17.
DustinC. ‘Thoreau's Religion’, in TurnerJ. (ed.), A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky), pp. 256–293.
18.
EckersleyR.1992. Environmentalism and Political Theory.Albany: State University of New York Press.
19.
GabrielsonT.2007. ‘Green citizenship’, Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, 8–10 March, Las Vegas, NV.
20.
JeffersonT.1816. Letter to Joseph C. Cabell, 2 February.
21.
KatebG.1984. ‘Democratic Individuality and the Claims of Politics’. Political Theory, 12(3): 331–360.
22.
KatzC.2003. ‘Thomas Jefferson's Liberal Anticapitalism’. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1): 1–17.
23.
LaneM.2009. ‘Thoreau and Rousseau’, in TurnerJ. (ed.), A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky), pp. 341–371.
24.
LieneschM.1988. New Order of the Ages.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
MariottiS.2009. ‘Thoreau, Adorno, and the critical potential of particularity’, in TurnerJ. (ed.), A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky), pp. 393–422.
26.
MarxL.1964. The Machine in the Garden.New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
McCoyD.1980. The Elusive Republic.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
28.
MillerC.A.1988. Jefferson and Nature.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
29.
MontmarquetJ.2000. ‘American agrarianism’, in ThompsonP. and HildeT. (eds.), The Agrarian Roots of Pragmatism (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press), pp. 51–76.
30.
NashR.1982. Wilderness and the American Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
NeufeldtL.N.1984. ‘Henry David Thoreau's political economy’. The New England Quarterly, 57: 359–383.
32.
OelschlaegerM.1991. The Idea of Wilderness.New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
PaehlkeR.C.1989. Environmentalism and the Future of Progressive Politics.New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
PaulS.1962. ‘A fable of the renewal of life’, in PaulS. (ed.), Thoreau (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall), pp. 100–116.
35.
PaulS.1966. ‘Resolution at Walden’, in ThomasO. (ed.), Walden and Civil Disobedience (New York: W.W. Norton), pp. 336–348.
36.
PetitP.1997. Republicanism.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
PetrulionisS.H.1999. ‘Editorial savoir faire’, Resources for American Literary Study, 25(2): 206–231.
38.
PocockJ.G.A.1975. The Machiavellian Moment.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39.
PocockJ.G.A., 1989. Politics, Language, and Time.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
PollanM., 1991. Second Nature.New York: Bantam.
41.
RobinsonD.1993. ‘Unchroniclednations’. Nineteenth Century Literature, 48(3): 326–340.
42.
RosenblumN.1981. ‘Thoreau's militant conscience’. Political Theory, 9(1): 81–110.
43.
RosenblumN.2009 [1998]. ‘Thoreau's democratic individualism’, in TurnerJ. (ed.), A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky), pp. 15–38.
44.
SandelM.J.1996. Democracy's Discontent.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
