Onora O'Neill has argued that an obligations-based anthropocentric ethics can support strong environmentalism. However, the value that non-human nature has in such ethics is still ultimately instrumental. I will argue in this paper that while O'Neill's ethics is conceptually close enough to Confucian role-based ethics, the latter allows that non-human nature can have a non-instrumental value and thus can support a robust environmentalism while remaining anthropocentric.
ChanWing Tsit (ed.) 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
EmmetDorothy1966. Rules, Roles and Relations.London: Macmillan.
3.
Godfrey-SmithWilliam1979. ‘The value of wilderness’, Environmental Ethics1: 309–319.
4.
HallDavid and AmesRoger1998. Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Cultures.Albany: SUNY Press.
5.
HourdequinM. and WongD.B.2005. ‘A relational approach to environmental ethics’, Journal of ChinesePhilosophy32: 19–33.
6.
IvanhoePhilip J.1998. ‘Early confucianism and environmental ethics’, in TuckerMary Evelyn and BerthrongJohn (eds.), Confucianism and Ecology (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press), pp. 59–76.
7.
KnoblockJ.1994. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
KorsgaardChristine M.1996. The Sources of Normativity.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
LeggeJames (ed.) 1970. The Chinese Classics, Vol. III. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
10.
LeggeJames (trans.) 1885. The Sacred Books of the East, vol. 16. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11.
LiChenyang1999. The Tao Encounters the West.Albany: SUNY Press, 1999.
12.
NortonBryan1984. ‘Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism’, Environmental Ethics6: 131–148.
13.
O'NeillOnora1997. ‘Environmental values, anthropocentrism, and speciesism’, Environmental Values6: 127–142.
14.
ParfitDerek1976. ‘On doing the best for our children’, in BaylesM.D., ed., Ethics and Population (Cambridge, Mass.; Schenkman Publishing Company), pp. 100–115.
15.
ParfitDerek1982. ‘Future generations: further problems’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 11: 113–172.
16.
TaylorCharles1989. Sources of the Self.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
17.
TuckerMary Evelyn2001. ‘Confucianism and deep ecology’, in BarnhillDavid Landis and GottliebRoger S. (eds.), Deep Ecology and World Religions (Albany: State University of New York Press), pp. 127–152.
18.
Wei-mingTu1998a. ‘Beyond the Enlightenment mentality’, in TuckerMary Evelyn and BerthrongJohn (eds.), Confucianism and Ecology (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press), pp. 3–21.
19.
Wei-mingTu1998b. ‘The continuity of being: Chinese visions of nature’, in TuckerMary Evelyn and BerthrongJohn (eds.), Confucianism and Ecology (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press), pp. 105–121.
