We analyse the nature of grassroots conflicts over the commercial logging of moabi (Baillonella toxisperma) by foreign firms in South-eastern Cameroon. Moabi offers a good starting point for understanding forest resistances because it crystallises nature conservation, commercial, as well as local interests as it provides oil, medicine and other use values to local populations and particularly to women. Combining a political ecology approach with elements of ecological economics, we find that the conflicts on moabi extraction can be analysed in terms of conflicting languages of valuation – the defence of livelihood and customary institutions versus economic growth and the national laws. We discuss the historical and institutional components of the conflicts as well as the specific role of women.
AgarwalB.1993. A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: University Press.
2.
AgarwalB.2001. ‘Participation exclusion, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework’. World Development29(10): 1623–1648.
3.
AltvaterE.1993. The Future of the Market: An Essay on the Regulation of Money and Nature after the Collapse of ‘Actually Existing Socialism’. London: Verso Books.
4.
BettiJ.L.1996. Étude Ethnobotanique des Plantes Médicinales de la Réserve de Faune du Dja (Cameroun). Yaoundé: Rapport ECOFAC/Cameroun.
5.
Bigombé LogoP. (ed.) 2004. Le Retournement de l'Etat Forestier: L'Endroit et l'Envers des Processus de Gestion Forestière au Cameroun. Yaoundé: Presses de l'Université Catholique d'Afrique Centrale.
6.
BlaikieP. and BrookfieldH.. 1987. Land Degradation and Society. London: Methuen.
7.
BromleyD.W.2004. ‘Reconsidering environmental policy: prescriptive consequentialism and volitional pragmatism’. Environmental and Resource Economics28: 73–99.
8.
BryantR. and BaileyS. (eds) 1997. Third World Political Ecology. London: Routledge.
9.
BunkerS. and CiccantellP.. 2005. Globalisation and the Race for Resources. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
CeruttiP. and TacconiL.. 2008. ‘Forests, illegality and livelihoods: the case of Cameroon’. Society and Natural Resources21(9): 845–53.
11.
CunyP., Abe'eleP., NguenangG., Eboule SingaN.A., Eyene EssombaA. and DjeukamR.. 2004. Etat des Lieux de la Foresterie Communautaire au Cameroun. Yaounde: Ministère de l'Environnement et des Forêts du Cameroun.
12.
CunyP., and TobithC.. 2006. ‘Genre et foresterie communautaire au Cameroun. Quelles perspectives pour les femmes?’ Bois et Forêts des Tropiques289(3): 17–26.
13.
de BlasD.E., Ruiz PérezM., SayerJ.A., LescuyerG., NasiR., and KarsentyA.. 2008. ‘External influences on and conditions for community logging management in Cameroon’. World Development37(2): 445–56.
14.
DebrouxL.1998. L'Aménagement des Forêts Tropicales fondé sur la Gestion des Population d'Arbres: L'Exemple du Moabi (Baillonella toxisperma) dans la Forêt du Dja. Université de Gembloux: Unpublished Ph.D Thesis.
15.
DiawC.2002. ‘Altérité des Tenures Forestières: Les Théories Scientifiques et la Gestion des Biens Communs’. Informations et Commentaires121: 9–20.
16.
DiawC.2005. ‘Modern economic theory and the challenge of embedded tenure institutions: African attempts to reform local forest policies’. In KantS. and BerryA. (eds), Sustainability Institutions and Natural Resources (Amsterdam: Springer), pp. 43–81.
17.
DiawC. and NjomkapJ.-C.. 1998. La Terre et le Droit: Une Anthropologie Institutionnelle de la Tenure Foncière au Sud Cameroun. Yaoundé: Institut Africain pour le Développement Economique et Social.
18.
DkamelaP.G.2001. Les Institutions Communautaires de Gestion des Produits Forestiers Non-Ligneux dans les Villages Périphériques de la Réserve de Biosphère du Dja. Reports No 7. Wageningen: The Tropenbos-Cameroon Programme.
19.
EkokoF.2000. ‘Balancing politics, economics and conservation: the case of the Cameroon Forestry Law reform’. Development and Change31(1): 131–154.
20.
MonitorForests. 2001. Sold Down the River: The Need to Control Transnational Forestry Corporations. Cambridge: Forests Monitor.
21.
Georgescu-RoegenN.1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
GerberJ.-F. and VeutheyS.. 2010. ‘Possession versus property in a rubber tree plantation socio-environmental conflict in Southern Cameroon’. Society and Natural Resources, in revision.
23.
GerberJ.-F., VeutheyS. and Martinez-AlierJ.. 2009. ‘Linking political ecology with ecological economics in tree plantation conflicts in Cameroon and Ecuador’. Ecological Economics68(12): 2885–2889.
24.
GereffiG. and KorzeniewiczM. (eds). 1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport: Greenwood Press.
25.
GiljumS. and EisenmengerN.. 2004. ‘North-South trade and the distribution of environmental goods and burdens: a biophysical perspective’. Journal of Environment and Development13(1): 73–100.
26.
Global Forest Watch. 2000. Aperçu de la Situation de l'Exploitation Forestière au Cameroun. Rapport de l'Observatoire Mondial des Forêts. Washington: World Resources Institute.
27.
Global Forest Watch. 2006. Fiche d'Identification des Unités Forestières d'Aménagement (UFA). Working paper.
28.
WitnessGlobal. 2005. Contrôle et Suivi des Infractions Forestières au Cameroun. Troisième Rapport Sommaire de l'Observateur Indépendant. Washington: Global Witness.
29.
HornborgA.1998. ‘Towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: articulating world system theory and ecological economics’. Ecological Economics25(1): 127–136.
30.
HornborgA.2001. The Power of the Machine.Walnut Creek: Altamira.
31.
HornborgA, McNeilJ.R. and Martinez-AlierJ.. 2007. Rethinking Environmental History. Lanham: Altamira.
32.
KarsentyA.1999. ‘Vers la fin de l'Etat forestier’. Politique Africaine75: 147–161.
33.
KarsentyA.2006. ‘Adjudication des Concessions, Rente Economique et Risque Financier: Le Débat sur la Fiscalité au Cameroun et en Afrique Centrale’. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques287(1): 78–85.
34.
M'GonigleR. M.1999. ‘Ecological economics and political ecology: towards a necessary synthesis’. Ecological Economics28: 11–26.
35.
Martínez-AlierJ.2002. The Environmentalism of the Poor. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
36.
Martínez-AlierJ. and O'ConnorM.. 1996. ‘Ecological and economic distribution conflicts’. In CostanzaR., SeguraO. and Martínez-AlierJ. (eds), Getting Down to Earth (Washington: Island Press), pp. 153–183.
37.
MooreJ.2003. ‘The modern world-system as environmental history? Ecology and the rise of capitalism’. Theory and Society32(3): 307–77.
38.
MuradianR. and Martinez-AlierJ.. 2001. ‘Trade and the environment: from a ‘Southern’ perspective’. Ecological Economics36(2): 281–97.
39.
MvengE.1984. Histoire du Cameroun. Yaoundé: Centre d'Edition pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche.
40.
NguiffoS.1998. ‘In defence of the commons: forest battles in southern Cameroon’. In GoldmanM. (ed.), Privatizing Nature: Political Struggles for the Global Common (London: Pluto Press), pp. 102–119.
41.
ObamA.1992. Conservation et Mise en Valeur des Forêts du Cameroun. Yaoundé: Imprimerie Nationale.
42.
O'HaraS.2009. ‘Feminist ecological economics theory and practice’. In SallehA. (ed.), Eco-Sufficiency and Global Justice (New York: Pluto Press), pp. 152–175.
43.
O'NeillJ.1997. ‘Value, pluralism, incommensurability and institutions’. In FosterJ. (ed.), Environmental Economics: A Critique of Orthodox Policy (London: Routledge), pp. 75–88.
44.
OyonoR.2002. ‘Usages Culturels de la Forêt au Sud-Cameroun: Rudiments d'Ecologie Sociale et Matériaux pour la Gestion du Pluralisme’. AfricaLVII(3): 334–355.
45.
OyonoR.2004. ‘The social and organizational roots of ecological uncertainties in Cameroon's Forest Management Decentralization Model’. European Journal of Development Research16(1): 174–191.
46.
OyonoR.2005. ‘The foundations of the Conflit de Langage over land and forests in southern Cameroon’. African Study Monographs26(3): 115–144.
47.
PaavolaJ.2007. ‘Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization’. Ecological Economics63(1): 93–103.
48.
PaavolaJ., and AdgerW.N.. 2005. ‘Institutional ecological economics’. Ecological Economics53(3): 353–368.
49.
PaulsonS., GezonLL. and WattsM.. 2003. ‘Locating the political in political ecology: an introduction’. Human Organization62(3): 205–217.
50.
PeetR. and WattsM.. 1996. Liberation Ecologies. London: Routledge.
51.
PerkinsE. (ed). 1997. ‘Special Issue on Women, Ecology, and Economics’. Ecological Economics20(2): 105–85.
RobbinsP.2004. Political Ecology.Malden: Blackwell.
54.
RocheleauD., Thomas-SlayterB. and WangariE. (eds) 1996. Feminist Political Ecology. New York: Routledge.
55.
SchneemannJ.1994. Étude sur l'Utilisation de l'Arbre Moabi dans l'Est-Cameroun. Yaoundé: Final Report of the Dutch Development Organisation (SNV).
56.
SneddonC., HowarthR.B. and NorgaardR.B. 2006. ‘Sustainable Development in a Post-Brundtland World’. Ecological Economics57(2): 253–268.
57.
SöderholmP.2001. ‘The deliberative approach in environmental valuation’. Journal of Economic IssuesXXXV(2): 487–495.
58.
SpashC.L.2000. ‘Multiple value expression in contingent valuation: economics and ethics’. Environmental Science and Technology34(8): 1433–1438.
59.
TrainorS.F.2006. ‘Realms of value: conflicting natural resource values and incommensurability’. Environmental Values15(1): 3–29.
60.
van den BergJ.1999. ‘Sustainable exploitation and management of forest resources: diverging perceptions on the forest’. In JonkersW.B.J. and WesselM. (eds), Forest Management Related Studies of the Tropenbos-Cameroon Programme (Wageningen: The Tropenbos-Cameroon Programme), pp. 15–26.
61.
VatnA.2000. ‘The environment as a commodity’. Environmental Values9(4): 493–509.
62.
VatnA.2005. Institutions and the Envrionment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
63.
VeutheyS. and GerberJ.-F.. 2010. ‘Logging conflicts in southern Cameroon: a feminist ecological economics perspective’. Ecological Economics70(2): 170–177.
64.
VerschaveF.-X., DiopB.B. and TobnerO.. 2005. Négrophobie. Paris: Les Arènes.
65.
WallersteinI.2004. World-Systems Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.
