This paper focuses on a Swedish case where a biological insecticide has been used to fight mosquitoes in order to reduce the nuisance to humans. The case concerns conflicting values regarding environmental protection. People's quality of life in the summers is placed in opposition to long-term risks to biodiversity. On the surface, the affected lay-population is one-sidedly positive about the intervention. However, interviews with citizens revealed a more complex picture, where the majority also touched upon value conflicts. At the same time, different psychological mechanisms for handling these dilemmas hindered more critical and doubtful views from being included in societal deliberations concerning the intervention. By way of conclusion, we argue that it is important to create deliberative arrangements that acknowledge the emotional and contradictory side of human nature and that encourage people to dare to voice standpoints that may be seen as uncomfortable or inconsistent.
Arias-MaldonadoM.2007. ‘An imaginary solution? The green defence of deliberative democracy’. Environmental Values16(2): 233–252.
2.
BanduraA.1997. ‘Mechanism of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71(2): 364–374.
3.
BanduraA.2002. ‘Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency’. Journal of Moral Education31(2): 101–119.
4.
BeekmanV. and BromF.W.A.2007. ‘Ethical tools to support systematic public deliberations about the ethical aspects of agricultural biotechnologies’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics20(1): 3–12.
5.
BerlinI.1956. ‘Equality’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society56: 301–326.
6.
BerlinI.2001. The Power of Ideas.London: Pimlico.
7.
BerlinI.2002. Liberty. Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
van den BornR.J.G., LendersR.H.J., de GrootW.T. and HuijsmanE.. 2001. ‘The new biophilia: an exploration of visions of nature in Western countries’. Environmental Conservation28(1): 65–75.
9.
van den BornR.J.G.2008. ‘Rethinking nature: Public visions in the Netherlands’. Environmental Values17(1): 83–109.
10.
BulkeleyH. and MolA.P.J.. 2003. ‘Participation and environmental governance: Consensus, ambivalence and debate’. Environmental Values12(2): 143–154.
11.
DesJardinJ.R.2005. Environmental Ethics. Invitation to Environmental Philosophy.New York: Thomson Learning.
12.
DietzT. and SternP. C.. 1998. ‘Science, values, and biodiversity’. Bioscience48(6): 441–444.
13.
DobsonA.1996. ‘Democratising Green Theory. Preconditions and principles’, in DohertyB.B., and de GeusM., (eds.) Democracy and Green Political Thought. Sustainability, Rights and Citizenship (London: Routledge), pp. 132–148.
14.
DryzekJ.R.1994. ‘Ecology and discursive democracy: Beyond liberal capitalism and the administrative state’, in O'ConnorM. (ed.) Is Capitalism Sustainable? Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology (London: The Guilford Press), pp. 176–195.
15.
FarrellyC.2009. ‘Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, reproductive freedom, and deliberative democracy’. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy34(2): 135–154.
16.
FestingerL.1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
FischerF.2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge.Durham: Duke University Press.
18.
FischerA., and van der WalR.. 2007. ‘Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird – the construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options’. Biological Conservation135(2): 256–267.
19.
GoodinR.E.1996. ‘Enfranchising the earth, and its alternatives’. Political Studies44(5): 835–849.
20.
GranbergM., LidskogR., and LarssonS.. 2008. ‘Dealing with uncertainty. A case study of controlling insect populations in natural ecosystems’. Local Environment13(7): 641–652.
21.
GregoryR.S.2002. ‘Incorporating value trade-offs into community-based environmental risk decisions’. Environmental Values11(4): 461–488.
22.
GutmanA. and ThompsonD.. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy?Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23.
HaanN.1985. ‘Process of moral development: Cognitive or social disequilibrium’?Developmental Psychology21(6): 996–1006.
24.
HeydT.2003. ‘The case for environmental morality’. Environmental Ethics25(1): 5–24.
25.
HoffmanM. L.2000. Empathy and Moral Development. Implications for Caring and Justice.New York: University Press.
26.
HunterL. M. and BrehmJ.. 2003. ‘Qualitative insight into public knowledge of, and concern with, biodiversity’. Human Ecology31(2): 309–320.
27.
HöijerB., LidskogR., and UgglaY.. 2006. ‘Facing dilemmas. Sense-making and decision-making in late modernity’. Futures38(3): 350–366.
28.
KelseyE.2003. ‘Integrating multiple knowledge systems into environmental decision making: Two case studies of participatory biodiversity initiatives in Canada and their implication for conceptions of education and public involvement’. Environmental Values12(3): 381–396.
29.
KirkhamG.2006. ‘Playing god and vexing nature: A cultural perspective’. Environmental Values15(2): 173–195.
30.
LeskinenL.A.2004. ‘Purpose and challenges of public participation in regional and local forestry in Finland’. Forest Policy and Economics6(6): 605–618.
31.
LidskogR.1997. ‘From conflict to communication? Public participation and critical communication as a solution to siting conflicts’. Planning Practice and Research12(3): 239–249.
32.
LidskogR. and ElanderI.. 2007. ‘Representation, participation or deliberation? Democratic responses to the environmental challenge’. Space and Polity11(1): 75–94.
33.
LindströmM., JohanssonM., HerrmanJ. and JohnssonO.. 2006. ‘Attitudes towards the conservation of biological diversity – a case study in Kristianstad municipality, Sweden’. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management48(4): 495–513.
34.
LoewensteinG. and SmallD.A.. 2007. ‘The scarecrow and the tin man: the vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring’. Review of General Psychology11(2): 112–126.
35.
MontgomeryC. A., 2002. ‘Ranking the benefits of biodiversity: an exploration of relative values’. Journal of Environmental Management65(3): 313–326.
36.
OjalaM.2008. ‘Recycling and ambivalence: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of household recycling among young adults’. Environment and Behavior40(6): 777–797.
37.
PetersonA.L.2006. ‘Toward a materialistic environmental ethics’. Environmental Ethics28(4): 375–393.
38.
PetersonM.N., PetersonM.J. and PetersonT.R.2005. ‘Conservation and the myth of consensus’. Conservation Biology19(3): 762–767.
39.
ReganT.1984. The Case for Animal Rights.London: Routledge.
40.
SingerP.1975. Animal Liberation.New York: Random House.
41.
SjöbergL.2000. ‘Perceived risk and tampering with nature’. Journal of Risk Research3(4): 353–367.
42.
SmithJ. A. and OsbornM.. 2003. ‘Interpretative phenomenological analysis’, in SmithJ. A. (ed.), Qualitative Psychology. A Practical Guide to Research Methods (London: Sage), pp. 51–80.
43.
SonerydL.2002. Environmental Conflicts and Deliberative Solutions? A Case Study of Public Participation in EIA in Sweden. Örebro Studies in Sociology 5. Örebro University. Sweden.
44.
StenmarkM.2002. Environmental Ethics and Policy-Making.Aldershot: Ashgate.
45.
Stoll-KleemannS. and O'RiordanT.. 2002. ‘From participation to partnership in biodiversity protection: Experience from Germany and South Africa’. Society and Natural Resources15: 161–177.
SzerszynskiB.2007. ‘The post-ecologist condition: Irony as symptom and cure’. Environmental Politics16(2): 337–355.
48.
SödermanT.2006. ‘Treatment of biodiversity issues in impact assessment of electricity power transmission lines: a Finnish case review’. Environmental Impact Assessment Review26(4): 319–338.
49.
UddenbergN.2001. ‘Vad tänker vi om djuren’?, in BrakenhielmC. R. (ed.), Världsbild och mening. En empirisk studie av livsåskådning i dagens Sverige (Falun, Sweden: Nya Doxa), pp. 136–171.
50.
United Nations.1992. Convention of Biological Diversity.New York: UN Department of Public Information.
51.
WalkerL. J.2004. ‘Gus in the gap: Bridging the judgment-action gap in moral functioning’, in LapsleyD.K. and NarvaezD. (eds.), Moral Development, Self, and Identity (Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum), pp. 1–20.
52.
WoodP. M.1997. ‘Biodiversity as the source of biological resources: a new look at biodiversity values’. Environmental Values6: 251–268.
53.
ZwartI.2007. ‘Local deliberation and the favouring of nature’. Environmental Values16(3): 485–511.
