Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The controversy over commercial releases of genetically modified (GM) crops demonstrates that there is a need for new approaches that are more broadly based, transparent and able to acknowledge the uncertainties involved. This article investigates whether new forms of knowledge productionas prescribed in the concept of post-normal science can improve risk governance of GM crops. The GM science review carried out in the UK in 2003 serves as a case study and the focus is on how scientific uncertainty and public concern was taken into account. Some recommendations are advanced for assessing scientific uncertainty, for accommodating scientific disputes and for integrating stakeholders’ interests and perspectives in relations to GM crops.

Keywords

GMOs crops the precautionary principle post-normal science risk management scientific uncertainty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andow

D.A.

2003. ‘Negative and positive data, statistical power, and confidence intervals’, Environmental Biosafety Research 2: 75–80.

Andow

D.A.

and Hilbeck

. 2004. ‘Science-based risk assessment for non-target effects of transgenic crops’, BioScience 54: 637–645.

Andow

D.A.

and Zwahlen

. 2006. ‘Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants’, Ecology Letters 9: 196–214.

CBD. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (http://www.biodiv.org/biosafe/protocol).

European Council Directive 2001/18/EC (http://www.europa.eu.int/commm/food/fs/sc/scp/out31_en.html).

ESA: The Ecological Society of America. 2004. Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations (http://www.esa.org).

The Expert Panel of Royal Society of Canada. 2001. Elements of precaution, Recommendations for the regulation of food biotechnology in Canada (http://www.rsc.ca).

Fjelland

2001. ‘Facing the problem of uncertainty’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15: 155–169.

Francis

J.M.

1996. ‘Nature conservation and the precautionary principle’, Environmental Values 5: 257–264.

10.

Funtowicz

S.O.

and Ravetz

J.R.

. 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 7–16.

11.

Funtowicz

S.O.

and Ravetz

J.R.

. 1993. ‘Science for the post normal age’, Futures 25: 739–755.

12.

Funtowicz

S.O.

and Ravetz

J.R.

. 1994. ‘The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science’, Ecological Economics 10: 197–207.

13.

Gene Technology Act. 1993. The Act relating to the production and use of genetically modified organism. Act no. 38 of 2 April 1993, Oslo, Norway.

14.

Giampietro

2002. ‘The Precautionary Principle and ecological hazards of genetically modified organisms’, Ambio 6: 466–470.

15.

GM science review (http://www.gmsciencedebate.org.uk).

16.

Harremoës

, Gee

, MacGarvin

, Stirling

, Keys

, Wynne

and Vaz

S.G.

. 2001. The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century. Late Lessons from Early Warnings. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd. (http://reports.eea.eu.int/environmental_issue_report_2001_22/).

17.

Hilbeck

and Schmidt

J.E.U.

. 2006. ‘Another view on Bt proteins–How specific are they and what else might they do?’ Biopesticides International 2: 1–50.

18.

Hill

R.A.

2005. ‘Conceptualizing risk assessment methodology for genetically modified organisms’, Environmental Biosafety Research 4: 67–70.

19.

Jensen

K.K.

, Gamborg

, Hauge Madsen

, Krayer von Krauss

, Folker

A.P.

and Sandøe

. 2003. ‘Making the EU “risk window” transparent: The normative foundations of the environmental risk assessment’, Environmental Biosafety Research 2: 161–171.

20.

Kelsey

2003. ‘Integrating multiple knowledge systems intoenvironmental decisionmaking: two case studies of participatory biodiversity initiatives in Canada and their implications for conceptions of education and public involvement’, Environmental Values 12: 381–396.

21.

König

, Cockburn

, Crevel

R.W.R.

, Debruyne

, Grafstroem

, Hammerling

, Kimber

, Knudsen

, Kuiper

H. A.

, Peijnenburg

A.A.C.M.

, Penninks

A.H.

, Poulsen

, Schauzu

and Wal

J.M.

. 2004. ‘Assessment of the safety of food derived from genetically modified (GM) crops’, Food and Chemical Toxicology 42(7): 1047–1880.

22.

Krayer von Krauss

K.M.

, Casman

and Small

. 2004. ‘Elicitation of expert judgments of uncertainty in the risk assessment of herbicide tolerant oilseed crops’, Journal of Risk Analysis 24: 1515–1527.

23.

Kvakkestad

, Gillund

and Kjølberg

K.A.

. 2007. ‘Scientists’ perspectives on the deliberate release of GM crops’, Environmental Values 16: 79–104.

24.

Lemons

, Shrader-Frechette

K.S.

and Cranor

. 1997. ‘The precautionary principle; Scientific uncertainty and type I and type II errors’, Foundation of Science 2: 207–236.

25.

Levidow

2003. ‘Precautionary risk assessment of Bt maize: what uncertainties?’, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 83: 113–117.

26.

Levidow

and Carr

. 2007. ‘GM crops on trial: Technological development as a real-world experiment’, Futures 39: 408–411.

27.

Mayer

and Stirling

. 2004. ‘GM crops: good or bad?’, EMBO reports 5: 1021–1024.

28.

Melo-Martin

and Meghani

. 2008. ‘Beyond risk’, EMBO Reports 9: 302–308.

29.

Meyer

, Folker

A.P.

, Jørgensen

R.B.

, Krayer von Krauss

, Sandø

and Tveit

. 2005. ‘The factualization of uncertainty: Risk, politics, and genetically modified crops – a case of rape’, Agriculture and Human Values 22: 235–242.

30.

Michaels

and Monforton

. 2005. ‘Manufacturing uncertainty: Contested science and the protection of the public's health and environment’, American Journal of Public Health, 95: s39–s48.

31.

Myhr

A.I.

and Traavik

. 2003. ‘Genetically modified crops: Precautionary science and conflicts of interests’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16: 227–247.

32.

NRC: National Research Council. 2004. Biological Confinement of Genetically Engineered Organisms. Washington, DC: National Academics Press.

33.

Prescott

V.E.

, Campbell

P.M.

, Moore

, Mattes

, Rothenberg

M.E.

, Foster

P.S.

, Higgins

J.V.

and Hogan

S.P.

. 2005. ‘Transgenic expression of bean r-Amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity’, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53: 9023–9030.

34.

Pryme

2003. ‘In-vivo studies on possible health consequences of GM food and feed’, Nutrition and Health 17: 1–8.

35.

Quist

and Chapela

. 2001. ‘Transgenic DNA introgresses into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico’, Nature 414: 541–543.

36.

Raffensperger

and Tickner

, eds. 1999. Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Washington: Island Press.

37.

Ravetz

2004. ‘The post-normal science of precaution’, Futures 36: 347–356.

38.

Regan

H.M.

, Akçakaya

H.R.

, Ferson

, Root

K.V.

, Carroll

and Ginzburg

L.R.

. 2003. ‘Treatments of uncertainty and variability in ecological risk assessment of single-species populations’, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 9. 889–906.

39.

Rosi-Marshall

E.J.

, Tank

J.L.

, Royer

TV.

, Whiles

M.R.

, Evans-White

, Chambers

, Griffiths

N.A.

, Pokelsek

and Stephen

M.L.

. 2007. ‘Toxins in transgenic crops byproducts may affect headwater stream ecosystems’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 104: 16204–16208.

40.

Sagar

, Daemmrich

and Ashiya

. 2000. ‘The tragedy of the commoners: biotechnology and its public’, Nature Biotechnology 18: 2–4.

41.

Sandin

2004. ‘The precautionary principle and the concept of precaution’, Environmental Values 13: 461–475.

42.

Sanvido

, Romeis

and Bigler

. 2007. ‘Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: Ten years of field research and commercial cultivation’. Advances in Biological Engineering and Biotechnology 107: 235–278.

43.

Sarewitz

2004. ‘How science makes environmental controversies worse’, Environmental Science and Policy 7: 385–403.

44.

Spök

, Gaugitsch

, Laffer

, Pauli

, Saito

, Sampson

, Sibanda

, Thomas

, van Hage

and Valenta

. 2005. ‘Suggestions for the assessment of the allergenic potential of genetically modified organisms’, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 137: 167–180.

45.

Squire

G.R

, Brooks

D.R.

, Bohan

D.A.

, Champion

G.T.

, Daniels

R.E.

, Haughton

A.J.

, Hawes

, Heard

M.S.

, Hill

M.O.

, May

M.J.

, Osborne

J.L.

, Perry

J.N.

, Roy

D.B.

, Woiwod

I.P.

and Firbank

L.G.

. 2003. ‘On the rationale and interpretation of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops’, Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, Series B, 358: 1779–1780.

46.

Stirling

2007. ‘Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate’, EMBO reports 8: 309–315.

47.

Von Schomberg

2006. ‘The precautionary principle and its normative challenges’, in Fisher

, Jones

J.J.

, and von Schomberg

(eds.), Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspetives and Prospects, (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 19–42.

48.

Walker

W.E.

, Harremoeës

, Rotmans

, van der Sluijs

J.P.

, van Asselt

M.B. A.

, Janssen

and Kraye von Krauss

M.P.

. 2003. ‘Defining uncertainty; a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model based decision support’, Journal of Integrated Assessment 4: 5–17.

49.

Weaver

S.A.

and Morris

M.C.

. 2005. ‘Risks associated with genetic modification: an annotated bibliography of peer reviewed natural science publications’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18: 157–189.

50.

Wilkinson

M.J.

, Elliott

L.J.

, Allainguillaume

, Shaw

M.W.

, Norris

, Welters

, Alexander

, Sweet

and Mason

D.C.

. 2003. ‘Hybridization Between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a National Scale in the United Kingdom’, Science 302: 401–403.

51.

Wolfenbarger

L.L.

and Phifer

P.R.

. 2000. ‘The ecological risks and benefits of engineered plants’, Science 290: 2088–2093.

52.

Wynne

1992. ‘Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm’, Global Environmental Change 2: 111–127.

53.

Wynne

2001. ‘Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics of GMOs’, Science as Culture 10: 445–481.

The Challenge of Scientific Uncertainty and Disunity in Risk Assessment and Management of GM Crops

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References