Ecosystems services are provisions that humans derive from nature. Ecologists trying to value ecosystems have proposed five categories of these services: preserving, supporting, provisioning, regulating and cultural. While this ecosystem services framework attributes ‘material’ value to nature, sacred natural sites are areas of ‘non-material’ spiritual significance to people. Can we reconcile the material and non-material values? Ancient classical traditions recognise five elements of nature: earth, water, air, fire and ether. This commentary demonstrates that the perceived properties of these elements correspond with the ecosystem services framework. Whilst the two can be reconciled, the ‘elements of nature’ framework is argued to be more suitable to make a case for conservation of sacred natural sites because it can be attractive to traditional societies whilst being acceptable to Western science.
AndersonD.M., SalickJ., MoseleyR.K., and OuX.K.. 2005. ‘Conserving the sacred medicine mountains: a vegetation analysis of Tibetan sacred sites in Northwest Yunnan’. Biodiversity and Conservation14: 3065–3091.
2.
AnsinkE., HeinL. and HasundK.P.. 2008. ‘To value functions or services? An analysis of ecosystem valuation approaches’. Environmental Values17: 489–503.
3.
BhagwatS.A., and RutteC.. 2006. ‘Sacred groves: potential for biodiversity management’. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment4: 519–524.
4.
BhagwatS.A., KushalappaC.G., WilliamsP.H., and BrownN.D.. 2005. ‘Landscape approach to biodiversity conservation of sacred groves in the Western Ghats of India’. Conservation Biology19: 1853–1862.
5.
BoydJ., and BanzhafS.. 2007. ‘What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units’. Ecological Economics63: 616–626.
6.
CheeY.E.2004. ‘An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services’. Biological Conservation120: 549–565.
7.
CostanzaR.2008. ‘Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed’. Biological Conservation141: 350–352.
8.
CostanzaR., d'ArgeR., deGrootR., FarberS., GrassoM., HannonB., LimburgK., NaeemS., O'NeillR.V., ParueloJ., RaskinR.G., SuttonP., and van den BeltM.. 1997. ‘The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital’. Nature387: 253–260.
9.
DailyG.C.1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
10.
DailyG.C.2000. ‘Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services’. Environmental Science and Policy3: 333–339.
11.
De GrootR.S.1992. Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
12.
De GrootR.S., WilsonM.A., and BoumansR.M.J.. 2002. ‘A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services’. Ecological Economics41: 393–408.
NunezD, NahuelhualL, OyarzunC.2006. ‘Forests and water: the value of native temperate forests in supplying water for human consumption’. Ecological Economics58: 606–616.
28.
PyleR.M.2003. ‘Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature’. Oryx37: 206–214.
29.
RandallA.1988. ‘What mainstream economists have to say about the value of biodiversity’. In W.E.O. (ed.), Biodiversity (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press), pp. 217–223.
30.
SagoffM.2008. ‘On the economic value of ecosystem services’. Environmental Values17: 239–257.
31.
SahlinsM., BargatzkyT., Bird-DavidN., ClammerJ., HamelJ., MaegawaK. and SiikalaJ. (1996 ‘The sadness of sweetness: the native anthropology of Western cosmology’ Current Anthropology37: 395–428.
32.
Salles-ReeseV.1997. From Viracocha to the Virgin of Copacabana: Representation of the Sacred at Lake Titicaca.Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
33.
SimonH.A.1957. Models of Man, Social and Rational.New York: Wiley.
34.
SpashC.L.2000. ‘Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetlands re-creation’. Ecological Economics34(2): 195–215.
35.
SpashC.L.2006. ‘Non-economic motivation for contingent values: rights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements’. Land Economics82(4): 602–622.
36.
SpashC.L.2008a. ‘How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the bio-diverse trail’. Environmental Values17: 259–284.
37.
SpashC.L.2008b. ‘Contingent valuation design and data treatment: if you can't shoot the messenger, change the message’. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy26(1): 34–53.
38.
TietenbergT.1991. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics.New York: Harper Collins.
39.
TurnerR.K. and DailyG.C.. 2008. ‘The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation’. Environmental and Resource Economics39: 25–35.
40.
TverskyA., and KahnemanD.. 1991. ‘Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference dependent model’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics106: 1039–1061.
41.
VerschuurenB.2007. Believing is Seeing: Integrating Cultural and Spiritual Values in Conservation Management.Gland, Switzerland: Foundation for Sustainable Development; EarthCollective; IUCN.
42.
WallaceK.J.2007. ‘Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions’. Biological Conservation139: 235–246.
43.
WallaceK.J.2008. ‘Ecosystem services: multiple classifications or confusion?’ Biological Conservation141: 353–354.
44.
WestP., IgoeJ. and BrockingtonD.. 2006. ‘Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas’. Annual Review of Anthropology35: 251–277.
