In this paper we examine the relation between technologies that aim to remediate pollution and moral responsibility. Contrary to the common view that successful remediation technologies will permit the wheels of industry to turn without interruption, we argue that such technologies do not exculpate polluters of responsibility. To make this case, we examine several environmental and non-environmental cases. We suggest that some strategies for understanding the moral problem of pollution, and particularly those that emphasise harms, exclude an important dimension of morality. In lieu of these strategies, we employ the concept of respect to characterise the type of attitude that underlies many of our judgments about responsibility.
KatzEric1992. ‘The big lie: human restoration of nature’. Research in Philosophy and Technology12: 231–241.
11.
KernohanAndrew1995. ‘Rights against polluters’. Environmental Ethics17: 245–257.
12.
KernohanAndrew2000. ‘Individual acts and accumulative harms’. Philosophical Studies97 (3): 343–366.
13.
LeonardHerman B., and ZeckhauserRichard J.1986. ‘Cost-benefit analysis applied to risks: its philosophy and legitimacy’, in MacLeanDouglas (ed.), Values at Risk, (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld).
14.
LightAndrew2003. “‘Faking Nature” Revisited’, in MichelfelderD. and WilcoxB. (eds.), The Beauty Around Us (Albany, NY: SUNY Press).
15.
LightAndrew and HiggsEric S.1996. ‘The politics of ecological restoration’. Environmental Ethics18: 227–247.
16.
LyonsDavid1969. ‘Rights, claimants and beneficiaries’. American Philosophical Quarterly6: 173–185.
17.
McKibbonWilliam1999. The End of Nature: Tenth Anniversary Edition. New York: Anchor Books.
18.
RuffLarry1970. ‘The economic sense of pollution’. The Public Interest19: 69–85.
19.
SagoffMark1978. ‘On restoring and reproducing art’. The Journal of PhilosophyLXXV (9): 453–470.
20.
SagoffMark2004. ‘The philosophical common sense of pollution’, in Price, Principle, and the Environment (New York: Cambridge University Press).
21.
SoperKate1995. What is Nature?Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
22.
SullivanKevin2007. ‘$25 million offered in climate change’. Washington Post, February 10.
23.
SunsteinCass R.2002. The Cost-Benefit State: The Future of Regulatory Protection. Chicago: American Bar Association.
24.
TellerEdward, WoodLowell and HydeRoderick1997. ‘Global warming and ice ages: prospecs for physics-based modulation of global change’, in 22nd International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies (Sicily: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory).
25.
ThomRonald M, BlantonSusan L, BordeAmy B, WilliamsGreg D, WoodruffDana L, HuesemannMichael H, NehringKW, and BrauningSE2002. ‘Investigations into wetland carbon sequestration as remediation for global warming’, in International Conference on Wetlands and Remediation (Richland, WA: US Department of Energy).
26.
ThomsonJudith Jarvis1986a. ‘Imposing risks’, in Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 173–191.
27.
ThomsonJudith Jarvis1986b. ‘Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem’, in Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 78–93.
