Recently, natural scientists have begun to support an interpretive turn in ecology. Yet the ethical implications of interpreting nature have not been sufficiently addressed. In this essay, I use different interpretations of nature to make three distinct but related points relevant to forestry: (1) ecological narratives should be evaluated on the basis of ethical norms, (2) the choice of which interpretations of nature and ethical norms to use in environmental policy should be conducted by a process of public deliberation, and (3) scientific narratives should be denied a priori privilege over non-scientific interpretations of nature for policy purposes.
AdamowiczW.L. and BurtonP.J.. 2003. ‘Sustainability and sustainable forest management’. In BurtonP.J., MessierC., SmithD.W. and AdamowiczW.L. (eds.), Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest (Ottawa: NRC-CNRC Research Press), pp. 41–64.
2.
AllenT.F.H., TainterJ.A., PiresJ.C. and HoekstraT.W.. 2001. ‘Dragnet Ecology – “Just the Facts, Ma'am”: the privilege of science in a postmodern world’. BioScience, 51(6): 475–485, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0475:DEJTFM]2.0.CO;2.
3.
AlpertP.1995. ‘The boulder and the sphere: subjectivity and implicit values in biology’. Environmental Values, 4: 3–15, doi:10.3197/096327195776679600.
4.
BehanR.W.1966. ‘The myth of the omnipotent forester’. Journal of Forestry, 64(6): 398–407.
5.
BergeronY. and HarveyB.. 1997. ‘Basing silviculture on natural ecosystem dynamics: an approach applied to the southern boreal Mixed wood forest of Quebec’. Forest Ecology and Management, 92: 235–242, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03924-2.
6.
BotkinD.B.1990. Discordant Harmonies. A New Ecology for the Twenty-first Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BunnellF.L.1995. ‘Forest-dwelling vertebrate faunas and natural fire regimes in British Columbia: patterns and implications for conservation’. Conservation Biology, 9(3): 636–644, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09030636.x.
8.
Canadian Forest Service. 1998. ‘Forest Health. Context for the CFS's Science Program’. Science Program Context Paper. Science Branch of the Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa: Natural Resource Canada.
9.
CastleE.N.1996. ‘A pluralistic, pragmatic and evolutionary approach to natural resource management’. In LightA. and KatzEric (eds.), Environmental Pragmatism (New York: Routledge), pp. 231–250.
10.
CurryP.2003. ‘Re-thinking Nature: towards an eco-pluralism’. Environmental Values, 12: 337–360, doi:10.3197/096327103129341351.
11.
DeweyJ.1920 (2004). Reconstruction in Philosophy. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
12.
DeweyJ.1922 (2002). Human Nature and Conduct. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
13.
DeweyJ.1938. Logic: Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.
14.
DeweyJ.1939. Theory of Valuation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
DoveM.R.1993. ‘Uncertainty, humility, and adaptation in the tropical forest: the agricultural augury of the Kantu”. Ethnology, 32(2): 145–167, doi:10.2307/3773770.
16.
DruryW.H.1998. Chance and Change. Ecology for Conservationists. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
FarberD.A.1999. Eco-Pragmatism: Making Sensible Environmental Decisions in an Uncertain World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
FishS.1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
19.
FullerS.2000. The Governance of Science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
20.
GlackenC.J.1967. Traces on the Rhodian Shore. Nature and Culture in Western Through Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century. Berkeley, CA.: University of California Press.
21.
GoodinR.1996. ‘Enfranchising the earth, and its alternatives’. Political Studies, 44(5): 835–849, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00337.x.
HailaY. and DykeC. (eds.). 2006a. How Nature Speaks. The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition.Durham: Duke University Press.
24.
HailaY. and DykeC.. 2006b. ‘Introduction: What to say about Nature's “speech”’. In HailaY. and DykeC. (eds.), How Nature Speaks. The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition (Durham: Duke University Press), pp. 1–48.
25.
HunterM.L.1993. ‘Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests’. Biological Conservation, 65: 115–120, doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90440-C.
26.
JohnsonE.A., MorinH., MiyanishiK., GagnonR. and GreeneD.F.. 2003. ‘A process approach to understanding disturbance and forest dynamics for sustainable forestry’. In BurtonP.J., MessierC., SmithD.W. and AdamowiczW.L. (eds.), Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest (Ottawa: NRC-CNRC Research Press), pp. 261–306.
27.
KatzE.2002. ‘The liberation of humanity and Nature’. Environmental Values, 11: 397–405, doi:10.3197/096327102129341145.
28.
KimminsJ.P.2004. ‘Emulating natural forest disturbance: What does this mean?’ In PereraA. H., BuseL.J. and WeberM.G. (eds.), Emulating Natural Forest Landscape Disturbances (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 8–28.
29.
KlenkN., FylesJ.W. and PareD.. 2004. ‘Controls on nutrient availability in black spruce forests of Northwestern Quebec’. Unpublished Manuscript.
30.
KuhnT.1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. New York: New American Library.
31.
LandresP.B., MorganP. and SwansonF.J.. 1999. ‘Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems’. Ecological Applications, 9(4): 1179–1188.
32.
LatourB.1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
33.
LatourB.2004. Politics of Nature. How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
34.
LatourB.2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
LeeK.N.1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment.Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
36.
LevinasE.1998. Entre Nous: Thinking-of-the-Other. New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
LuckertM.K.2006. ‘Has the myth of the omnipotent forester become the reality of the impotent forester?’ Journal of Forestry, 104(6): 299–306.
38.
McQuillanA.G.1993. ‘Cabbages and kings: the ethics and aesthetics of New Forestry’. Environmental Values, 2(3): 191–221, doi:10.3197/096327193776679918.
39.
MinteerB.A.2005. ‘Environmental philosophy and the public interest: a pragmatic reconciliation’. Environmental Values, 14: 37–60, doi:10.3197/0963271053306104.
40.
Moody-AdamsM.1997. Fieldwork in Familiar Places: Morality, Culture, and Philosophy. Cambridge, Massacusetts: Harvard University Press.
41.
MorganP., ApletG.H., HauflerJ.B., HumpriesH.C., MooreM.M. and WilsonW.D.. 1994. ‘Historical range of variability: a useful tool for evaluating ecosystem change’. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2: 87–111, doi:10.1300/J091v02n01_04.
NortonB.G.2005. Sustainability : A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
O'NeillJ.2001. ‘Representing people, representing nature, representing the world’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4): 483–500, doi:10.1068/c12s.
45.
O'NeillJ.2006. ‘Who speaks for Nature?’ In HailaY and DykeC. (eds.), How Nature Speaks. The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition (Durham: Duke University Press), pp. 261–277.
46.
ParsonsD.J., SwetnamT.W. and ChristensenN.L.. 1999. ‘Uses and limitations of historical variability concepts in managing ecosystems’. Ecological Applications, 9(4): 1177–1178, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1177:UALOHV]2.0.CO;2.
47.
PereraA.H. and BuseL.J.. 2004. ‘Emulating natural disturbance in forest management’. In PereraAjith H., BuseLisa J. and WeberMichael G. (eds.), Emulating Natural Forest Landscape Disturbances (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 3–7.
48.
PickettS.T.A. and WhiteP.S.. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.
49.
PierceC.S.1998. ‘Fixation of belief’. In CohenMorris R. (ed.), Chance, Love, and Logic: Philosophical Essays (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press), pp. 7–31.
50.
PrescottC.E., MaynardD.G. and LaihoR.. 2000. ‘Humus in northern forests: friend or foe?’ Forest ecology and Management, 133: 23–36, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00295-9.
51.
PurdonM.2003. ‘The Nature of ecosystem management: postmodernism and plurality in the sustainable management of the boreal forest’. Environmental Science and Policy, 6(4): 377–388, doi:10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00064-9.
52.
PutnamH.1990. ‘How not to solve ethical problems’. In ConantJames (ed.), Realism with a Human Face (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press), pp. 179–192.
53.
PutnamH.1994. ‘Pragmatism and Moral Objectivity’ in ConantJames (ed.). Words and Life: Hilary Putnam (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press), pp. 151–181.
54.
PutnamH.2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
55.
PutnamH.2004. Ethics Without Ontology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
56.
PutnamH. and PutnamR.A.1994. ‘Dewey's logic’. In ConantJames (ed.), Words and Life: Hilary Putnam (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press), pp. 198–220.
57.
RappaportR.A.1968. Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People. New Haven: Yale University Press.
58.
RobertsonD.P. and HullB.R.. 2001. ‘Beyond biology: toward a more public ecology for conservation’. Conservation Biology, 15: 970–979, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004970.x.
59.
RolstonHIII.1988. Environmental Ethics.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
60.
RuseM. and WilsonE.O.. 1994. ‘Moral philosophy as applied science’. In SoberElliott (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press), pp. 421–438.
61.
ScottJ.C.1998. Seeing like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
62.
SetliffE.C.2002. ‘The wound pathogen Chondrostereum purpureum: its history and incidence in North America’. Australian Journal of Botany, 50: 645–651, doi:10.1071/BT01058.
63.
ShotterJ.2006. ‘Participative thinking: “seeing the face” and “hearing the voice” of Nature’. In HailaY. and DykeC. (eds.), How Nature Speaks: The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition (Durham: Duke University Press), pp. 106–126.
64.
SimberloffD.1998. ‘Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era?’ Biological Conservation, 83(3): 247–257, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00081-5.
65.
VogelS.2006. ‘The silence of Nature’. Environmental Values, 15: 145–171, doi:10.3197/096327106776678898.
66.
WaltersC. and HollingC.S.. 1990. ‘Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing’. Ecology, 71: 2060–2068, doi:10.2307/1938620.
67.
WhiteP.S. and WalkerJ.L.. 1997. ‘Approximating nature's variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology’. Restoration Ecology, 5: 338–349, doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00547.x.
68.
WorsterD.1994. Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
YanowD.2006. ‘Thinking interpretively: philosophical presuppositions and the human sciences’. In YanowDvora and Schwartz-SheaPeregrine (eds.), Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research and the Interpretive Turn (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe), pp. 5–26.
70.
YoungI.M.2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
