Holland argues that environmental deliberation should return to classical questions about the nature of the good life, understood as the worthwhile life. Holland's proposal contrasts with the revived hedonist conception of the good life which has been influential on environmentalism. The concept of the worthwhile life needs to be carefully distinguished from those of the happy life and the dutiful life. Holland's account of the worthwhile life captures the narrative dimension of human well-being which is revealed but inadequately addressed by hedonic research. Environmental concerns are better understood from a non-hedonist perspective. An Aristotelian version of this perspective also offers the institutional focus which Holland suggests is required in environmental deliberation.
BeardmanS.2000. ‘The choice between current and retrospective evaluations of pain’. Philosophical Psychology13: 97–110, doi: 10.1080/09515080050002744.
3.
BellE.T.1953. Men of Mathematics, vol. II. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
4.
BroomeJ.1996. ‘More pain or less?’ Analysis56: 116–118, doi: 10.1111/j.0003-2638.1996.00116.x.
5.
ChekhovA.1982. ‘Gooseberries’, in The Kiss and Other Stories (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
6.
DienerE., WirtzD. and OishiS.. 2001. ‘The peak-end phenomenon in life satisfaction judgments: the James Dean effect’. Psychological Science12: 124–128.
7.
DonovanN. and HalpbernD.. 2002. Life Satisfaction: The State of Knowledge and Implications for Government.London: Cabinet Office.
8.
EasterlinR.2001. ‘Income and happiness: Towards unified theory’. Economic Journal111: 465–484, doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00646.
9.
FeldmanF.2006. Pleasure and the Good Life.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
FirthD.2008. ‘Do meaningful relationships with nature contribute to a worthwhile life?’ Environmental Values17: [XXX–XXX].
11.
FrederickS. and LoewensteinG.. 1999. ‘Hedonic adaptation’, in KahnemanD., DienerE. and SchwartzN. (eds.), Scientific Perspectives on Enjoyment, Suffering, and Well-Being (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
12.
GoodinR.1992. Green Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
GustafsonD.2000. ‘Our choice between actual and remembered pain and our flawed preferences’. Philosophical Psychology13: 111–119, doi: 10.1080/09515080050002753.
15.
HirschF.1977. Social Limits to Growth.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16.
HollandA.2002. ‘Are choices trade-offs?’, in BromleyD. and PaavolaJ. (eds.), Economics, Ethics and Environmental Policy (Oxford: Blackwell).
17.
HollandA.2006. ‘Must we give up environmental ethics?’ in ten HaveHenk A.M.J. (ed.), Environmental Ethics and International Policy (Paris: UNESCO).
18.
HollandA. and RawlesK.. 1995. The Ethics of Conservation. Report presented to The Countryside Council for Wales, Thingmount Series, No.1. Lancaster University: Department of Philosophy.
19.
InwoodB. and GersonL., eds. 1988. Hellenistic Philosophy.Indianapolis: Hackett.
20.
KahnemanD., FredricksonB., SchreiberC. and RedelmeierD.. 1993. ‘When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end’. Psychological Science4: 401–405, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x.
21.
KahnemanD., WakkerP. and SarinR.. 1997. ‘Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics112: 375–405, doi: 10.1162/003355397555235.
22.
KahnemanD., DienerE. and SchwarzN., eds. 1999. Well-Being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
23.
KahnemanD. and KruegerA.. 2006. ‘Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being’. Journal of Economic Perspectives20: 3–24, doi: 10.1257/ 089533006776526030.
24.
KahnemanD. and SugdenR.. 2005. ‘Experienced utility as a standard of policy evalu-ation’. Environmental and Resource Economics32: 161–181, doi: 10.1007/s10640-005-6032-4.
25.
KnightF.1922. ‘Ethics and the economic interpretation’. Quarterly Journal of Economics36: 454–481, doi: 10.2307/1886033.
26.
LayardR.2005. Happiness: Lessons for a New Science.London: Allen Lane.
27.
Lucretius1965. On Nature, trans. GreerR.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
28.
MalcolmN.1984. Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
MarksN., AbdallahS., SimmsA. and ThompsonS.. 2006. The Happy Planet Index.London: New Economics Foundation.
30.
MarxK.1970. Capital I. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
31.
NeurathO.1925. ‘Economic plan and calculation in kind’, in UebelT. and CohenR.S. (eds.), Otto Neurath: Economic Writings 1904–1945 (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004).
32.
O'NeillJ.1993. Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-Being and the Natural World.London: Routledge.
33.
O'NeillJ.1998. The Market: Ethics, Knowledge and Politics.London: Routledge.
34.
O'NeillJ.2006. ‘Citizenship, well-being and sustainability: Epicurus or Aristotle?’ Analyse & Kritik28: 158–172.
35.
O'NeillJ.2007. Markets, Deliberation and Environment.London: Routledge.
36.
O'NeillJ. and HollandA.. 1999. ‘Two approaches to biodiversity value’, in PoseyD. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity (London: UNEP).
37.
O'NeillJ. and HollandA.. 2003. ‘Yew trees, butterflies, rotting boots and washing lines’, in LightA. and de ShalitA. (eds.), Moral and Political Reasoning in Environmental Practice (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press).
38.
O'NeillJ., HollandA. and LightA.. 2008. Environmental Values.London: Routledge.
39.
PerrettR. W.1999. ‘Preferring more pain to less’. Philosophical Studies93: 213–226, doi: 10.1023/A:1004203127093.
40.
PolanyiK.1957. The Great Transformation.Boston: Beacon Press.
41.
PorrittJ.2003. Redefining Sustainability.London: Sustainable Development Commission.
42.
SenA.1986. ‘The standard of living’, in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values VII (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
43.
SenA.1999. Development as Freedom.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
ShahH. and MarksN.. 2004. A Well-being Manifesto for a Flourishing Society. London: New Economics Foundation.
45.
VellemanJ.2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
WilliamsB.1973. ‘A critique of utilitarianism’, in SmartJ.J.C. and WilliamsB., Utilitarianism For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
47.
WoodA.1990. Hegel's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
