Not much attention has been paid to gender in environmental management and decision-making. This article explores how a gender dimension can contribute to the environmental debate by means of a comparative study of three environmental grassroots organisations in the North of Catalonia (Spain). The study shows that gender is significant for distinguishing different priorities between women and men in local conflicts and in environmental interests in general. The analysis of unequal power relations between genders in grassroots organisations leads us to discuss how women have fewer opportunities to influence the environmental debate and to advance their ideas. The concluding thoughts stress the need for developing a gender dimension in environmental management and decision-making, considering the opportunities that are presented by emerging governance practices, and particularly by participatory processes.
BarkeR, Jenkins-SmithH, and SlovicP.1997. ‘Risk Perceptions of Men and Women Scientists’, Social Science Quarterly, 78: 167–76.
2.
BeckU.1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.London: Sage Publications.
3.
Brú-BistuerJ.1996. ‘Spanish Women Against Industrial Waste: A Gender Perspective on Environmental Grassroots Movements’, in RocheleauD., Thomas-SlayterB. and WangariE. (eds), Feminist Political Ecology (London: Routledge), pp. 105–24.
4.
BlockerT.J. and EckbergD.L.1997. ‘Gender and Environmentalism. Results from 1993 General Survey’, Social Science Quarterly, 78: 841–58.
5.
BlockerT.J. and EckbergD.L.1989. ‘Environmental Issues as Women's Issues: General Concerns and Local Hazards, Social Science Quarterly, 70: 3.
6.
BoetzkesE.1998. ‘Gender, Risk, and Scientific Proceduralism’, Ecosystem Health, 4(3): 162–9.
7.
BrownP. and FergusonF.I.1997. ‘Making a Big Stink: Women's Work, Women's Relationships, and Toxic Waste Activism’, in SachsC.E. (ed.), Women Working in the Environment (Washington DC: Taylor & Francis Publishers), pp. 241–64.
8.
BurnsN., ScholzmanK.L. and SidneyV.2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality and Political Participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9.
Buckingham-HatfieldS.1999. ‘Gendering Agenda 21: Women's involvement in setting the environmental agenda’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1: 121–32.
10.
Buckingham-HatfieldS.1998. ‘Public Participation in Local Agenda 21: The Usual Suspects’, in KivellP., RobertP. and WalkerG.P. (eds), Environment, Planning and Land Use (New York/ London: Routledge), pp. 208–19.
11.
CaiazzaA. and BarretA.2003. Engaging Women in Environmental Activism: Recommendations for Rachel's Network. Washington DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
12.
CorralT. and RansomP.2002. ‘Engendering Local Participation for Sustainable Development’, Paper commissioned by UNED Forum as input for the workshopGender Perspectives for Earth Summit 2002. Energy; Transport; Information for Decision-Making. (http://www.wedo.org/ehealth/berlin_engendering.htm) accessed 12/11/2004.
13.
DavisonD.J. and FreudenburgW.R.1996. ‘Gender and Environmental Risk Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Available Research’, Environment and Behaviour, 28: 202–29. (http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/I913.pdf).
14.
DietzT. and KalofL.2002. ‘Gender, Values and Environmentalism’, Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 351–64.
15.
EvansB. and PercyS.1999. ‘The Opportunities and Challenges for Local Environmental Policy and Action in the UK’, in Buckingham-HatfieldS., and PercyS. (eds), Constructing Local Environmental Agendas: People, Places and Participation (London/New York: Routledge), pp. 172–85.
16.
FinucaneM.L., SlovicP., MertzC.K., FlynnJ. and SatterfieldT.A.2000. ‘Gender, Race, and Perceived Risk: The ‘White Male’ Effect’, Health, Risk & Society, 2(2): 159–72.
17.
FlynnJ., SlovickP. and MetzC.1994. ‘Gender, Race and Perceptions of Environmental Health Risks’, Risk Analysis, 14: 1101–8.
18.
Fox KellerE.1992. Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death. Essays on Language, Gender and Science. London/New York: Routledge.
19.
FuntowiczS. and RavetzJ.R.2000. La Ciencia Postnormal. Ciencia con la Gente. Barcelona: Icaria.
20.
GuttelingJ.M. and WiegmanO.1993. ‘Gender-Specific Reactions to Environmental Hazard in the Netherlands’, Sex Roles, 28: 433–47.
21.
HardingS.1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. New York: Cornell University Press.
22.
HayesB.C. and TariqV.N.2000. ‘Gender Differences in Scientific Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Science: A Comparative Study of Four Anglo-American Nations’, Public Understanding of Science, 9(4): 433–47.
MerchantC.1980. The Death of Nature. Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. New York: HarperCollins.
26.
MerchantC.1995. Earthcare. Women and the Environment. New York: Routledge.
27.
MohaiP.1997. ‘Men, Women and the Environment: An Examination of the Gender Gap in Environmental Concern and Activism’, in SachsC.E. (ed.), Women Working in the Environment (Washington DC: Taylor & Francis Publishers), pp. 215–39.
28.
MorenoA.1987. El Arquetipo Viril Protagonista de la Historia: Ejercicios de Lectura no Androcéntrica. Barcelona: La Sal.
29.
Nel.loO. (ed.) 2003. Aquí, no! Els Conflictes Territorials a Catalunya. Barcelona: Empúries.
30.
PlumwoodV.1991. ‘Nature, Self and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism’, Hypathia, 6: 3–27.
31.
PlumwoodV.1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London/New York: Routledge.
32.
PlumwoodV.2002. Environmental Culture. The Ecological Crisis of Reason, London/ New York: Routledge.
33.
RocheleauD.Thomas-SlayterB. and WangariE.1996. Feminist Political Ecology. London: Routledge.
34.
RoseG., KinnairdV., MorrisM. and NashC.1997. ‘Feminist Geographies of Environment, Nature and Landscape’, in Women and Geography Study Group, Feminist Geographies: Explorations in Diversity and Difference (Harlow: Longman), pp. 146–90.
35.
RoseHillary. 1994. Love, Power and Knowledge. Towards a Feminist Transformation of Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
SatterfieldT.A., MertzC.K. and SlovicP.2004. ‘Discrimination, Vulnerability and Justice in the Face of Risk’, Risk Analysis, 24(1): 115–29.
39.
StearneyL.M.1994. ‘Feminism, Ecofeminism and the Maternal Archetype: Motherhood as a Feminine Universal’, Communication Quarterly, 42: 145–59
40.
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.1992. Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. New York: United Nations
41.
WalshC.2001. Gender and Discourse. Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organisations. London: Pearson ESL.
42.
WaylenG.1998. ‘Gender, Feminism and the State. An Overview’, in RandallV. and WaylenG. (eds), Gender, Politics and the State (New York/London: Routledge), pp. 1–17.
