Cross-compliance has proven its effectiveness, as can be shown by looking at the Swiss experience with cross-compliance since 1999. Besides describing the existing cross-compliance practices in Switzerland, the paper shows different perspectives on the efficiency and fairness of cross-compliance. It concludes that transaction cost advantages justify cross-compliance only in few cases. Usually, it will be more efficient to decouple social and environmental policy. The strong support for cross-compliance by the Swiss population is explained by a perceived unfairness in the distribution of property rights between farmers and society. If property rights would be redistributed, there probably would be no more need for cross-compliance.
BergschmidtA., NitschH. and OsterburgB. (2003). Good Farming Practice – definitions, implementation, experiences. Reports on the results of workpackage 2 within the EU Concerted Action ‘Developing cross-compliance in the EU – background, lessons, opportunities’. London: IEEP.
2.
CoaseR.H. (1960). ‘The Problem of Social Cost’. The Journal of Law and Economics3 (1): 1–44.
3.
DoornbosG., and PastoorB. (2001). ‘Multifunctionaliteit in landbouwbeleid’. Tijdschrift voor Socialwetenschapelijk Onderzoek van de Landbouw16 (2): 110–13.
EllwoodD. (1988). Poor Support: Poverty and the American Family. New York: Basic Books.
6.
EllwoodD., (1989). ‘The Origins of “Dependency”: Choices, Confidence or Culture?’ Focus12 (1).
7.
EllwoodD., and BaneM.J. (1983). ‘Slipping Into and Out of Poverty: The Dynamics of Spells’. National Bureau of Economic research Working Paper.
8.
HagedornK. (1989). ‘Public Choice and Agricultural Policy’. In DasguptaP., ed., Issues in Contemporary Economics, Vol. 3. New York.
9.
HarteL., and O'ConnellJ. (2003). ‘How Well do Agri-Environmental Payments Conform with Multifunctionality?’ EuroChoices2 (1): 36–41.
10.
HerzogF. (2004). Nutzen und Kosten der Ökomassnahmen. Oral Presentation at 12 May 2004.
11.
JohnsonB.L. (2003). ‘Ethical Obligations in a Tragedy of the Commons’. Environmental Values12 (3): 271–87.
12.
KimC.G. (2001). ‘Policy Development for Integrating Agriculture and the Environment’. Journal of Rural Development Seoul24 (2): 247–71.
13.
Latacz-LohmannU., and BuckwellA. (1998). ‘Einige ökonomische Überlegungen zu “cross-compliance”’. Agrarwirtschaft47 (11): 429–31.
14.
di MaglianoR.P., CarboneS., and QuartoA. (2001). ‘Stima de servizio ambientale di modelli di agricoltura eco-compatibile nelle aree marginali degradate’. Georgofili48 (1–2): 331–50.
15.
MannS. (2000). ‘Transaktionskosten der landwirtschaftlichen Investitionsförderung – ein komparativer Ansatz’. Agrarwirtschaft49 (7): 259–69.
16.
MerricksP. (2002). ‘Gaining environmental benefits from positive land management: practical experience from the North Kent Marches’. 13th International Farm Management Congress11 (6): 379–86.
17.
Mitchell, K. (1999). ‘European Policies for Field Margins and Buffer Zones’. Aspects of Applied Biology54: 13–18.
18.
NorthD.C. (1990). ‘A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics’. Journal of Theoretical Politics2 (4): 355–67.
19.
PetersenJ.E., and ShawK. (2000). Overview of Cross Compliance Measures in EU Member States. London: IEEP.
20.
RomstadE., VatnA., RørstadP.K., and SøylandV. (2000). Multifunctional Agriculture: Implications for Policy Design. Ås: NLH.
21.
ScheeleM., and SchmittG. (1987). Streit um den Wasserpfennig. Göttingen: Diskussionsbeitrag.
22.
StreuliE., and BauerT. (2002). Working Poor in der Schweiz. Neuchatel: Bundesamt für Statistik.
23.
TinbergenJ. (1937). An Economic Approach to Business Cycle Problems. Paris: Hermann.
24.
TinbergenJ. (1956). On the Theory of Economic Policy. Amsterdam: North Holland.
25.
TullockG., HillmanJ. (1991). Public Choice and Agriculture: An American Example. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
VatnA. (2002). ‘Multifunctional Agriculture: Some Consequences for International Trade Regimes’. European Review of Agricultural Economics29 (3) 309–327.
28.
WebsterJ.P.G. (1997). ‘Assessing the Economic Consequences of Sustainability in Agriculture’. Agriculture, Ecosystems and the Environment64 (2): 95–102.
29.
WilliamsonO.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
