Both scientific realism and social constructionism offer unpromising and even destructive ways of trying to understand nature and human–nature relations. The reasons include what these apparent opponents share: a commitment to the (latterly) modernist division between subject/culture and object/nature that results from what is here called ‘monist essentialism’. It is contrasted with ‘relational pluralism’, which provides the basis of a better alternative – ecopluralism – which, properly understood, is necessarily both ecocentric and pluralist.
CallicottJ. Baird (1994). Earth's Insights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
CallicottJ. Baird (1997). ‘In Defence of Earth's Insights’, Worldviews1(2): 167–82.
12.
CapraFritjof (1997). The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. London: HarperCollins/Flamingo.
13.
ChappellT.D.J. (ed.) (1997). The Philosophy of the Environment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
14.
CrononWilliam (ed.) (1995). Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
15.
CurryPatrick (2000). ‘Redefining Community: Towards an Ecological Republicanism’, Biodiversity and Conservation9(8): 1059–71.
16.
DerridaJacques (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston IL: Northwestern UP.
17.
DrinkwaterChris (1996). ‘Ecology and Postmodernism’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds.
18.
EhrenfeldDavid (1976). ‘The Conservation of Non-Resources’, American Scientist64: 648–56.
19.
RoyEllen and KatsuyoshiFukui (eds) (1996). Redefining Nature. Oxford: Berg.
20.
EkinsPaul (1992). A New World Order: Grassroots Movements for Global Change. London: Routledge.
21.
EverndenNeil (1985). The Natural Alien: Humankind and Environment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
22.
EverndenNeil (1992). The Social Construction of Nature. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
FeyerabendPaul (1987). Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.
24.
FeyerabendPaul (1995). Killing Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
FudgeErica (2000), ‘Introduction to Special Edition: Reading Animals’, Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion4(2): 101–13.
26.
GoodpasterK.E. and SayreK.M. (eds) (1979). Ethics and Problems of the 21st Century. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
27.
HaylesN. Katherine (1995). ‘Searching for Common Ground’, in Soulé and Lease (eds), pp. 46–63.
28.
HaywardTim (1994). Ecological Thought: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29.
HaywardTim (1998). Political Theory and Ecological Values. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
IngoldTim (1996). ‘Hunting and Gathering as Ways of Perceiving the Environment’, in Ellen and Fukui (eds), pp. 117–55.
31.
JonasHans (1982). The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
JordanovaLudmilla (1987). ‘The Interpretation of Nature: a Review Article’, Comparative Studies on Society and Nature29(1): 195–200.
33.
EricKatz, Light AndrewKatz and RothenbergDavid (eds) (2000). Beneath the Surface: Critical Essays in the Philosophy of Deep Ecology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
34.
KontosAlkis (1994). ‘The World Disenchanted, and the Return of Gods and Demons’, in HorowitzAsher and MaleyTerry (eds), The Barbarism of Reason: Max Weber and the Twilight of Reason(Toronto: University of Toronto Press), pp. 223–47.
35.
LaclauErnesto and MouffeChantal (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso, 2nd edn 2001.
36.
LatourBruno (1993). We Have Never Been Modern, transl. PorterCatherine. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
37.
LatourBruno (1999). Politiques de la nature. Paris: Editions La Decouverte.
38.
LivingstoneDavid (1981). The Fallacy of Wildlife Conservation. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
McQuillanAlan G. (1998). ‘Passion and Instrumentality: Further Thoughts on the Callicott–Norton Debate’, Environmental Ethics20(3): 317–24.
41.
MagliolaRobert (1984). Derrida on the Mend. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
42.
MaturanaHumberto and VarelaFrancisco (1980). Autopoisesis and Cognition. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
43.
MaturanaHumberto and VarelaFrancisco (1987). The Tree of Knowledge. Boston: Shambhala.
44.
MidgleyMary (1997). ‘Sustainability and Moral Pluralism’, in Chappell (ed.), pp. 89–101.
45.
MinteerBen A (2001). ‘Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists?’ Environmental Ethics23(1): 57–75.
46.
NortonBryan (1991). Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
OrtonDavid (2000). ‘Anthropocentrism and Theoretical Fatalism: A Comment on the Terms of Reference of the ‘Eminent Panel on Seal Management’ (Nov. 23, 2000); available on http://fox.nstn.ca/#greenweb/
48.
O'SheaJames R. (2000). ‘Sources of Pluralism in William James’, in Baghramian and Ingram (eds), pp. 17–43.
49.
PetersR.H. (1980). ‘From Natural History to Ecology’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine23: 191–203.
50.
PetersonAnna (1999). ‘Environmental Ethics and the Social Construction of Nature’, Environmental Ethics21(4): 339–57.
51.
PlumwoodVal (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
52.
PolanyiMichael (1958). Tacit Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
53.
PrestonChristopher J. (1998). ‘Epistemology and Intrinsic Values: Norton and Callicott's Critiques of Rolston’, Environmental Ethics20(4): 409–28.
54.
HolmesRolstonIII (1997). ‘Nature for Real: Is Nature a Social Construct?’, in Chappell (ed.), pp. 38–64.
55.
SallehAriel (1997). Ecofeminism as Politics. London: Zed Books.
56.
ScarboroughMilton (1994). Myth and Modernity: Post-Critical Reflections. Albany: SUNY Press.
57.
SchamaSimon (1995). Landscape and Memory. London: HarperCollins.
58.
ScottJames C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
59.
SearleJohn (1995). The Construction of Social Reality.New York: Free Press.
60.
SimonsHerbert W. and MeliaTrevor (eds) (1989). The Legacy of Kenneth Burke. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
61.
SmithBarbara Herrnstein (1988). Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
SmithBarbara Herrnstein (1997). Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
SnyderGary (1990). The Practice of the Wild. San Francisco: North Point.
SoperKate (1995). What is Nature?Oxford: Blackwell.
66.
SouléMichael E. and GaryLease (eds) (1995). Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. Washington DC: Island Press.
67.
SylvanRichard and BennettDavid (1994). The Greening of Ethics: From Human Chauvinism to Deep-Green Theory. Cambridge: The White Horse Press.
68.
TesterKeith (1991). Animals and Society: The Humanity of Animal Rights. London: Routledge.
69.
TolkienJ.R.R. (1988 [1964]). ‘On Fairy-Stories’, in Tree and Leaf(London: Unwin Hyman).
70.
Viveiros de CastroEduardo (1998). ‘The Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Cosmologies’, a paper given in Dec. 1998 at the University of Manchester; published in 1998 (in a slightly different version) as ‘Cosmological Deixsis and Amerindian Perspectivism’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute4: 469–88
71.
LambekMichael (ed.) (2002). A Reader in the Anthropology of Religion(Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 306–26.
72.
WeberMax (1991). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. GerthH.H. and Wright MillsC.. London: Routledge.
