In this paper, I explore some parallels and dissimilarities between aesthetic appreciation that takes as its focus art objects and that which focuses on natural objects. I cover three areas. The first deals with general approach, whether a paradigm of engagement is more appropriate to environmental aesthetics than one of detachment and disinterest. The second theme is about preservation and whether the appropriate model is static or dynamic. The final theme is about environmental criticism and the application of aesthetic theory to arguments for preservation.
AddisonJoseph (and Steele) [1712]. ‘On the Pleasures of the Imagination’. Nos. 411–421. In Robert Allen (ed.), Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1957.
2.
AlisonArchibald1968. Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste. Hildeshein: Georg Olms Verlagsbughhandlung.
3.
BeardsleyMonroe C.1981. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism.Indianapolis: Hackett.
4.
BerleantArnold1992. The Aesthetics of Environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
5.
BerleantArnold1998. ‘Environmental Aesthetics’. In KellyMichael (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Aesthetics, p. 115. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
ArnoldBerleant and CarlsonAllen1998. Introduction to the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism56(2), Special Issue on Environmental Aesthetics.
7.
BourassaSteven1991. The Aesthetics of Landscape. London: Belhaven Press.
8.
BulloughEdward1912. “‘Psychical Distance'’ as a Factor in Art and as an Aesthetic Principle’, British Journal of Psychology.
9.
CarlsonAllen1977. ‘On the Possibility of Quantifying Scenic Beauty’, Landscape Planning4: 131–72.
10.
CarlsonAllen1990. ‘Whose Vision? Whose Meanings? Whose Values? Pluralism and Objectivity in Landscape Analysis’. In GrothP. (ed.), Vision, Culture, and Landscape. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
CarlsonAllen1993. ‘Appreciating Art and Appreciating Nature’. In KemalSalim and GaskellIvan (eds), Landscape, Natural Beauty and the Arts.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CarlsonAllen2000. Aesthetics and the Environment. New York: Routledge.
13.
DeweyJohn1934. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee.
14.
EatonMarcia Muelder1998. ‘Fact and Fiction in the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism56(2): 149–56.
GodlovitchStan1988. ‘Evaluating Nature Aesthetically’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism56(2): 113–25.
17.
HepburnRonald1967. ‘Nature, Philosophical Ideas of’, in the Encyclopedia of Philosophy, pp. 454–8. New York: MacMillan.
18.
HumeDavid [1757]. ‘Of the Standard of Taste’, Four Dissertations. New York: Garland, 1970.
19.
HutchesonFrancis [1726]. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. New York: Garland, 1971.
20.
KantImmanuel [1790]. Critique of Judgement. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.
21.
LeeKeekok1995. ‘Beauty for Ever?’ Environmental Values4(3): 213–25.
22.
LoftinRobert W.1986. ‘Psychical Distance and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Wilderness’, International Journal of Applied Philosophy.
23.
SaitoYuriko1998. ‘The Aesthetics of Unscenic Nature’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism56(2): 101–11.
24.
SchopenhauerArthur1896. The World as Will and Idea. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
25.
YrjöSepänmaa1986. The Beauty of Environment: A General Model for Environmental Aesthetics. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarium Fennica. (Second Edition, Denton: Environmental Ethics Books, 1993).
26.
ShaftesburyAnthony1964. Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
27.
StolnitzJerome1960. Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Criticism. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
28.
ThompsonJanna1995. ‘Aesthetics and the Value of Nature’, Environmental Ethics17: 291–305.
