Current rates of climatic change will affect the structure and function of community assemblages on Earth. In recent decades, advances in modelling techniques have illuminated the potential effects of various climatic scenarios on biodiversity hotspots, including community assemblages in the Himalayas. These techniques have been used to test the effects of representative concentration pathways (RCPs) AR5-2050, based on future greenhouse gas emission trajectories of climate change scenario/year combinations, on pheasants. Current bioclimatic variables, Miroc-esm, Hadgem2-AO and Gfdl-cm3, in future climate change scenario models, were used to predict the future distribution and the gain/loss of future habitat area, within the Himalayas, of the pheasant, Satyr Tragopon (Tragopan satyra). The results indicate that future climatic conditions may significantly affect the future distribution of Satyr Tragopon and the effectiveness of protective areas (PAs). Using the python based GIS toolkit, SDM projection, regions of high risk under climate change scenarios were identified. To predict the present distribution of the species, environment parameters of bioclimatic variables, red reflectance, blue reflectance, solar azimuth angle, altitude, slope, aspect, NDVI, EVI, VI, and LCLU were used. The forest cover (NDVI) and the canopy cover (EVI), and variables affecting forest structure, namely altitude, slope, solar azimuth angle and Bio7, were the primary factors dictating the present distribution of T. satyra. The predicted trend of habitat shifting of T. satyra in the Himalayas to higher altitudes and latitudes will gradually become more prominent with climate warming.
AcharyaB.K. and VijayanL. (2007) Little known Asian bird: range extension of Rustybellied Shortwing Brachypteryx hyperythra in Sikkim, India. Birding Asia, 7, 50e–51.
BadolaH.K. and AitkenS. (2010) Potential biological resources for poverty alleviation in Indian Himalaya. Biodiversity, 11, 8–18.
4.
BaralH.S. (2005) Status and conservation of Nepal's Galliformes. In: FullerR. and BrowneS. (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Galliformes Symposium, Dehra Dun and Corbett National Park, India, 5–10 April. The World Pheasant Association, Fordingbridge, UK.
5.
BertrandR., PerezV. and GégoutJ.C. (2012) Disregarding the edaphic dimension in species distribution models leads to the omission of crucial spatial information under climate change: the case of Quercus pubescens in France. Global Change Biol., 18, 2648–2660.
6.
BibbyC.J., BurgessN.D., HillD.A. and MustoeS.H. (2000) Bird census techniques. Academic Press, London.
7.
BirdLife International (2012) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife International red data book. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
8.
BoakesE.H., McGowanP.J., FullerR.A., Chang-qingD., ClarkN.E., O'ConnorK. and MaceG.M. (2010a) Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data. PLoS Biol., 8, e1000385.
9.
BoakesE.H., McGowanP.J., FullerR.A., Chang-qingD., ClarkN.E., O'ConnorK. and MaceG.M. (2010b) Data from: Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1464.
10.
BrownJ.L. (2014) SDM toolbox: a python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses. Methods Ecol. Evol., 5, 694–700.
11.
ChazdonR.L, HarveyC.A., KomarO., GriffithD.M., FergusonB.G., Martínez-RamosM. and PhilpottS.M. (2009) Beyond reserves: a research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica, 41, 142–153.
12.
ChettriN., SharmaE., ShakyaB., ThapaR., SharmaM., BajracharyaB., UddinK., OliK.P., DasguptaJ. and ChaudhuryD. (2010) Biodiversity in the Eastern Himalaya: status, trends, and vulnerability to climate change; climate change and vulnerability in the Eastern Himalayas, technical paper 2. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal.
13.
ChhetriB., BadolaH.K. and BaratS. (2017) Ecological study of Satyr Tragopan (Tragopan satyra) in Sikkim-India: a threatened bird species of Eastern Himalaya. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res., 8, 20362–20368.
14.
ClarkN.E., BoakesE.H., McGowanP.J.K., MaceG.M. and FulerR.A. (2013) Protected areas in South Asia have not prevented habitat loss: a study using historical models of land use change. PLoS One, 8, e65298.
15.
Cruz-CardenasG., Lopez-MataL., VillasenorJ.L. and OrtizE. (2014) Potential species distribution modelling and the use of principal component analysis as predictor variables. Rev. Mex. Biodivers., 85, 189–199.
16.
DuM.Y., KawashimaS., YonemuraS., ZhangX.Z. and ChenS.B. (2004) Mutual influence between human activities and climate change in the Tibetan plateau during recent years. Global Planet. Change, 41, 241–249.
17.
DunnJ.C., BuchananG.M., SteinR.W., WhittinnghamM.J. and McGowanP.J.K. (2016) Optimising different types of biodiversity coverage of protected areas with a case study using Himalayan Galliformes. Biol. Conserv., 196, 22–30.
18.
FloryA.R., KumarS., StohlgrenT.J. and CryanP.M. (2012) Environmental conditions associated with bat white nose syndrome mortality in the north-eastern United States. J. Appl. Ecol., 49, 680–689.
19.
FriggensM.M. and FinchD.M. (2015) Implications of climate change for bird conservation in the Southwestern U.S. under three alternative futures. PLoS One, 10, e0144089.
20.
FullerR.A. and GarsonP.J. (2000) Pheasants: status survey and conservation action plan 2000–2004. IUCN Publications Services Unit, Cambridge, UK.
21.
HannahL., MidgleyG., AndelmanS., AraujoM., HughesG., Martinez-MeyerE., PearsonR. and WilliamsP. (2007) Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front. Ecol. Environ., 5, 131–138.
22.
HilaluddinK. and GhoseD. (2005) Conservation implication of wild animal biomass extraction in Northeast India. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv., 28, 169–179.
23.
HuG.X., JinY., WangR.X., MaoF.J. and LiY. (2015) Predicting impacts of future climate change on the distribution of the widespread conifer Platycladus orientalis. PLoS One, 1, 15.
24.
InskippC., BaralH.S., PhuyalS., BhattT.R., KhatiwadaM., InskippT., KhatiwadaA., GurungS., SinghP.B., MurrayL., PoudyalL. and AminR. (2016) The status of Nepal's birds: the national red list series. Zoological Society of London, UK.
Jimenez-ValverdeA. and LoboJ.M. (2007) Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. Acta Oecol., 31, 361–369.
27.
KaulR., JandrotiaJ.S. and McGowanP.J.K. (2004) Hunting of large mammals and pheasants in the Indian western Himalayas. Oryx, 38, 426–431.
28.
KhalingS. (1998) Certain aspects of ecology and behavior of the Satyr Tragopan Tragopan satyra in the Singhalila National Park, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India. PhD thesis, North Bengal University, Calcutta, India.
29.
KnuttiR. and SedláčekJ. (2013) Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 369–373.
30.
KollmairM., GurungG.S., HurniK. and MaselliD. (2005) Mountains: special places to be protected? An analysis of worldwide nature conservation efforts in mountains. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manage., 1, 1–9.
31.
LelliottA.D. (1981) Studies of Himalayan Pheasants in Nepal with reference to their conservation. MSc thesis, University of Durham, UK.
32.
LiuH. and ChenB. (2000) Climatic warming in the Tibetan Plateau during recent decades. Int. J. Climatol., 20, 1729–1742.
33.
MaceG.M., CollarN.J., GastonK.J., Hilton-TaylorC. and AkcakayaH.R. (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conserv. Biol., 22, 1424–1442.
34.
McLaughlinJ.F., HellmannJ.J., BoggsC.L. and EhrlichP.R. (2002) Climate change hastens population extinctions. PNAS, 99, 6070–6074.
35.
MolloyS.W., DavisR.A., DunlopJ.A. and Van EttenE.J.B. (2017) Applying surrogate species presences to correct sample bias in species distribution models: a case study using the Pilbara population of the Northern Quoll. Nat. Conserv., 18, 25–46.
36.
Mota-VargasC. and OctavioR.R.-S. (2016) Taxonomy and ecological niche modeling: implications for the conservation of wood partridges (genus Dendrortyx). J. Nat. Conserv., 29, 1–13.
37.
PearsonR.G., RaxworthyC.J., NakamuraM. and PetersonA.T. (2007) Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr., 34, 102–117.
38.
PoudyalL.P. (2008) Distribution and habitat use of pheasants in the headwater forests of Setikhola Annapurna conservation area, Nepal, p. 66. MSc thesis, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.
39.
RameshK., SathyakumarS. and RawatG.S. (1999) Ecology and conservation status of the pheasants of Great Himalayan National Park, Western Himalaya, report no.: GHNP03/11. Forestry Research Education and Extension Project, Great Himalayan National Park. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun.
40.
RickettsT.H., DinersteinE., BoucherT., BrooksT.M., ButchartS.H., HoffmannM. and RodriguesA.S. (2005) Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 18497–18501.
41.
RodriguezJ.P., BrotonsL., BustamanteJ. and SeoaneJ. (2007) The application of predictive modelling of species distribution to biodiversity conservation. Divers. Distrib., 13, 243–251.
42.
RootT. (1988) Environmental factors associated with avian distributional boundaries. J. Biogeogr., 15, 489–505.
43.
SarmaK., KumarA., KrishnaM., MedhiM. and TripathiO.P. (2015) Predicting suitable habitats for the vulnerable Eastern Hoolock Gibbon, Hoolock leuconedys, in India using the MaxEnt model. Folia Primatol., 86, 387–397.
44.
SharmaE., ChettriN., Tse-ringK., ShresthaA.B., FangJ., MoolP. and ErikssonM. (2009) Climate change impacts and vulnerability in the Eastern Himalayas. ICIMOD, Kathmandu.
45.
ShresthaA.B., WakeC.P., MayewskiP.A. and DibbJ.E. (1999) Maximum temperature trend in the Himalaya and its vicinity: an analysis based on temperature records from Nepal for the period 1971–94. J. Climate, 12, 2775–2786.
46.
SolomonS., QinD., ManningM., AverytK. and MarquisM. (eds) (2007a) Climate change 2007. The physical science basis. Fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47.
SolomonS., QinD., ManningM., ChenZ., MarquisM., AverytK.B., TignorM. and MillerH.L. (2007b) Climate change 2007. The physical science basis. Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48.
StockerT.F., QinD., PlattnerG-K., TignorM., AllenS.K., BoschungJ., NauelsA., XiaY., BexV. and MidgleyP.M. (2013) Climate change 2013. The physical science basis. Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.
49.
SwetsJ.A. (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285–1293.
50.
WangW., TangX., ZhuQ., PanK., HuQ., HeM. and LiJ. (2014) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of major native non-food bioenergy plants in China. PLoS One, 9, e111587.
51.
WeyantJ., AzarC., KainumaM., KejunJ., NakicenovicN., ShuklaP., RovereE.L. and YoheY. (2009) Report of 2.6 versus 2.9 Watts/m2 RCPP evaluation panel. Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium, Switzerland.
52.
WiensJ.A., StralbergD., JongsomjitD., HowellC.A. and SnyderM.A. (2009) Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. PNAS, 106, 9729–19736.
