Longitudinal multi-plot studies of nest architecture in non-domesticated birds are rare. Here we report the results of an 18-year multi-plot study that compared heights of fresh female-built nests in Corsican Great Tits (Parus major) and Blue Tits (Cyanistes caeruleus ogliastrae). Boxes with relatively small nest-chambers were erected in a landscape with habitat patches that were either dominated by food-rich broad-leaved deciduous oaks (Quercus humilis) or food-poor evergreen oaks (Quercus ilex). Nest height tended to change with oak habitat type in a species-specific manner. Great Tits built shallower nests than Blue Tits supporting the published findings from other geographic regions (Poland, UK, southern mainland France). Potential impacts of local climate factors and risks related to nest predation on the species-specific expression of the size of nests are discussed.
AlabrudzińskaJ., KalińskiA., SfomczyńskiR., WawrzyniakJ., ZielińskiP., and BańburaJ. (2003) Effects of nest characteristics on breeding success of Great Tits Parus major. Acta Ornithol., 38, 151–154.
2.
BlondelJ., DiasP.C., PerretP., MaistreM., and LambrechtsM.M. (1999) Selection-based biodiversity at a small spatial scale in a low-dispersing insular bird. Science, 285, 1399–1402.
3.
BlondelJ., ThomasD.W., CharmantierA., PerretP., BourgaultP., and LambrechtsM.M. (2006) A thirty-year study of phenotypic and genetic variation of Blue Tits in Mediterranean habitat mosaics. BioScience, 56, 661–673.
4.
BrittJ., and DeemingD.C. (2011) First-egg date and air temperature affect nest construction in Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus, but not in Great Tits Parus major. Bird Study, 58, 78–89.
5.
DeemingD.C. (2013) Effects of female body size and phylogeny on avian nest dimensions. Avian Biol. Res., 6, 1–11.
6.
DeemingD.C., MainwaringM.C., HartleyI.R., and ReynoldsS.J. (2012) Local temperature and not latitude determines the design of Blue Tit and Great Tit nests. Avian Biol. Res., 5, 203–208.
7.
HansellM. (2000) Bird nests and construction behaviour.Cambridge University Press.
8.
HeebP., SchwanderT., and FaoroS. (2003) Nestling detectability affects parental feeding preferences in a cavity-nesting bird. Anim. Behav., 66, 637–642.
9.
HeenanC.B., and SeymourR.S. (2013) Structural support, not insulation, is the primary driver for avian cup-shaped nest design. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B 278, 2924–2929.
10.
KalińskiA., WawrzyniakJ., BańburaM. (2014) Does the threat of European Pine Marten (Martes martes) predation influence the height of nests built by Blue Tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and Great Tits (Parus major)?Avian Biol. Res., 7, 83–90.
11.
LambrechtsM.M., AdriaensenF., ArdiaD.R. (2010) The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases. Acta Ornithol., 45, 1–26.
12.
LambrechtsM.M., AiméC., MidamegbeA. (2012) Nest size and breeding success in first and replacement clutches: an experimental study in Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus. J. Ornithol., 153, 173–179.
13.
LambrechtsM.M., BourgaultP., MenneratA. (2007) Cavity-nesting black rats in distinct Corsican oak habitats and their potential impact on breeding Paridae. Folia Zool., 56, 445–448.
14.
LambrechtsM.M., CaroS., CharmantierA. (2004) Habitat quality as a predictor of spatial variation in Blue Tit reproductive performance: a multi-plot analysis in a heterogeneous landscape. Oecologia, 141, 555–561.
15.
LambrechtsM.M., DemeyrierV., FargevieilleA. (2014) Great Tits build shallower nests than Blue Tits. Avian Biol. Res., 7, 251–254.
16.
LensL., WautersL.A., and DhondtA.A. (1994) Nest-building by Crested Tit Parus cristatus males: an analysis of costs and benefits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 35, 431–436.
17.
LöhrlH. (1986) Experimente zur Bruthöhlenwahl der Kohlmeise (Parus major). J. Ornith., 127, 51–59.
18.
LimaS.L. (2009) Predators and the breeding bird: behavioural and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol. Rev., 84, 485–513.
19.
MainwaringM.C., and HartleyI.R. (2013) The energetic costs of nest building in birds. Avian Biol. Res., 6, 12–17.
20.
MainwaringM.C., HartleyI.R., BearhopS. (2012) Latitudinal variation in Blue Tit and Great Tit nest characteristics indicates environmental adjustment. J. Biogeogr., 39, 1669–1677.
21.
MainwaringM.C., HartleyI.R., LambrechtsM.M., and DeemingD.C. (2014) The design and function of birds’ nests. Ecol. Evolut., 20, 3909–3928.
22.
MazgajskiT.D., and RykowskaZ. (2008) Dependence of nest mass on nest hole depth in the Great Tit Parus major. Acta Ornithol., 43, 49–55.
23.
MøllerA.P., AdriaensenF., ArtemyevA.V. (2014) Variation in nest size in relation to clutch size in birds. Ecol. Evolut., 4, 3583–3595.
24.
NagerR.G., and van NoordwijkA.J. (1992) Energetic limitation in the egg-laying period of Great Tits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 249, 259–263.
25.
NilssonS.G. (1984) The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the impact of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scand., 15, 167–175.
26.
PerrinsC.M. (1979) British tits.Collins, London.
27.
PrzybyloR., WigginsD.A., and MeriläJ. (2001) Breeding success in Blue Tits: good territories or good parents?J. Avian Biol., 32, 214–218.
28.
SchaedelinF.C., and TaborskyM. (2009) Extended phenotypes as signals. Biol. Rev., 84, 293–313.
29.
SibleyC.G. (1955) Behavioral mimicry in the titmice (Paridae) and certain other birds. Wilson Bull., 67, 128–132.
30.
SlagsvoldT. (1989a) Experiments on clutch size and nest size in passerine birds. Oecologia, 80, 297–302.
31.
SlagsvoldT. (1989b) On the evolution of clutch size and nest size in passerine birds. Oecologia, 79, 300–305.
32.
SmithJ.A., HarrisonT.J.E., MartinG.R., and ReynoldsS.J. (2013) Feathering the nest: food supplementation influences nest construction by Blue (Cyanistes caeruleus) and Great Tits (Parus major). Avian Biol. Res., 6, 18–25.
33.
SolerJ.J., MøllerA.P., and SolerM. (1998) Nest building, sexual selection and parental investment. Evol. Ecol., 12, 427–441.
34.
StanbackM.T., BartholomewJ.E., BergnerL.M. (2013) House wrens alter nest architecture to compensate for cavity vulnerability. Wilson J. Ornithol., 125, 174–178.
35.
TomásG., MerinoS., MorenoJ., SanzJ.J., MoralesJ., and García-FraileS. (2006) Nest weight and female health in the Blue Tit (Cyanistes caeruleus). Auk, 123, 1013–1021.
36.
WesołtowskiT. (2002) Anti-predator adaptations in nesting Marsh Tits Parus palustris: the role of nest-site security. Ibis, 144, 593–601.
37.
WesołtowskiT., and MaziarzM. (2012) Dark tree cavities – a challenge for hole nesting birds?J. Avian Biol., 43, 454–460.
