ArA. (1991) Egg water movements during incubation. In: Avian Incubation, TullettS.G. (ed.), pp. 157–173. Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
2.
ArA., MeirM., AisikN., and CampiD. (1996) Standard values and ranges of ostrich egg parameters as a basis for proper artificial incubation. In: Improving our Understanding of Ratites in a Farming Environment, DeemingD.C. (ed.), pp. 144–146. Ratite Conference Books, Oxfordshire.
3.
BaggottG.K. (2001) Development of extra-embryonic membranes and fluid compartments. In: Perspectives in Fertilisation and Embryonic Development in Poultry, BaggottG.K., BakstM.R., BellairsR., ChristensenV.L., FasenkoG.M., and StarckJ.M., (eds.), pp. 23–30. Ratite Conference Books, Lincoln. Reprinted in 2009: Avian Biol. Res., 2, 21–26.
4.
BamelisF., TonaK., De BaerdemaekerJ., and DecuypereE. (2001) Increasing chicken eggs hatchability by matching incubator humidity to eggshell conductance.Avian Poult. Biol. Rev., 12, 169.
5.
BurtonF.G., and TullettS.G. (1983) A comparison of the effects of eggshell porosity on the respiration and growth of domestic fowl, duck and turkey embryos.Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 75A, 167–174.
6.
DeemingD.C. (2000) Principles of Artificial Incubation for Game Birds.Ratite Conference Books, Oxfordshire.
7.
DeemingD.C. (2002). Functional characteristics of eggs. In: Avian Incubation: Behaviour, Environment and Evolution, DeemingD.C. (ed.), pp. 28–42. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8.
FrenchN.A., and TullettS.G. (1991) Variations in the eggs of poultry species. In: Avian Incubation, TullettS.G. (ed.), pp. 59–77. Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
9.
MauldinJ.M., and MacKinnonI.R. (2002) Hatchery ventilation and environmental control. In: Practical Aspects of Commercial Incubation in Poultry, DeemingD.C. (ed.), pp. 47–52. Ratite Conference Books, Lincoln. Reprinted in 2009: Avian Biol. Res., 2, 87–91.
10.
MeirM., and ArA. (1987) Improving turkey poult quality by correcting incubator humidity to match eggshell conductance.Brit. Poult. Sci., 28, 337–342.
11.
MeirM., and ArA. (1996) Artificial increase of eggshell conductance improves hatchability of early laid goose eggs.Brit. Poult. Sci., 37, 937–951.
12.
MeirM., NirA., and ArA. (1984) Increasing hatchability of turkey eggs by matching incubator humidity to shell conductance of individual eggs.Poult. Sci., 63, 1469–1496.
13.
RahnH., and ArA. (1974) The avian egg: incubation time and water loss.Condor, 76, 147–152.
14.
RahnH., PaganelliC.V., and ArA. (1979) How bird eggs breathe.Sci. Amer., 240, 46–55.
15.
TullettS.G. (1981) Theoretical and practical aspects of egg shell porosity.Turkeys, 29, 24–28.
16.
TullettS.G., and DeemingD.C. (1982) The relationship between eggshell porosity and oxygen consumption in the domestic fowl.Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 72A, 529–533.
17.
VisschedijkA.H.J. (1968). The air space and embryonic respiration 2. The times of pipping and hatching as influenced by an artificially changed permeability of the shell over the air space.Brit. Poult. Sci., 9, 185–196.
18.
VisschedijkA.H.J., GirardH., and ArA. (1988) Gas diffusion in the shell membranes of the hen's egg: lateral diffusion in situ.J. Comp. Physiol., B158, 567–574.