Genome-wide association study (GWAS) technology has been a primary method for identifying the genes responsible for diseases and other traits for the past 10 years. Over 2,000 human GWAS reports now appear in the scientific journals. The technology is continuing to improve, and has recently become accessible to researchers studying a wide variety of animals, plants and model organisms. Here, we present an overview of GWAS concepts: the underlying biology, the origins of the method, and the primary components of a GWAS experiment.
GurgulA., SemikS., PawlinaK. (2014) The application of genome-wide SNP genotyping methods in studies on livestock genomes. J. Appl. Genet., 55, 197–208.
2.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. (2012) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1092 human genomes. Nature, 491, 56–65.
3.
FrancioliL.C., PolakP.P., KorenA. Genome of the Netherlands Consortium, van Duijn, C.M., Swertz, M., Wijmenga, C., et al. (2015) Genome-wide patterns and properties of de novo mutations in humans. Nat. Genet., 47, 822–826.
4.
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. (2004) Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature, 431, 931–945.
5.
The International HapMap Consortium. (2005) A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature, 437, 1299–1320.
6.
WelterD., MacArthurJ., MoralesJ. (2014) The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D1001–6.
7.
KleinR.J., ZeissC., ChewE.Y. (2005) Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science, 308, 385–389.
8.
TeslovichT., MusunuruK., SmithA. (2010) Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature, 466, 707–13.
9.
HabekM., BrinarV., and BoroveckiF. (2010) Genes associated with multiple sclerosis: 15 and counting. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn., 10, 857–861.
10.
BushW., and MooreJ. (2012) Chapter 11: Genome-Wide association studies. PLOS Comput. Biol., 8(12), e1002822.
11.
LaurieC.C., DohenyK.F., MirelD.B.; GENEVA Investigators. (2010) Quality control and quality assurance in genotypic data for genome-wise association studies. Genet. Epidemiol., 34, 591–602.
Eu-ahsunthonwattanaJ., MillerE.N., and FakiolaM., Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2, Jeronimo, S.M.B., Blackwell, J.M., Cordell, H.J. (2014) Comparison of methods to account for relatedness in genome-wide association studies with family-based data. PLOS Genet., 10, e1004445.
14.
Pe'erI., YelenskyR., AltshulerD., and DalyM.J. (2008) Estimation of the multiple testing burden for genomewide association studies of nearly all common variants. Genet. Epidemiol., 32, 381–385.
15.
ShamP.C., and PurcellS.M. (2014) Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nat. Rev. Genet., 15, 335–346.
16.
VilhjálmssonB.J., and NordborgM. (2013) The nature of confounding in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet., 14, 1–2.
17.
KangH.M., SulJ.H., ServiceS.K. (2010) Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet., 42, 348–354.
18.
ZhouX., and StephensM. (2012) Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat. Genet., 44, 821–824.
19.
StrangerB.E., StahlE.A., and RajT. (2011) Progress and promise of genome-wide association studies for human complex trait genetics. Genetics, 187, 367–383.
20.
ManolioT., CollinsF.S., CoxN.J. (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature, 461, 747–753.
21.
MarjoramP., ZubairA., and NuzhdinS.V. (2014) Post-GWAS: where next? More Samples, more SNPs or more biology?Heredity, 112, 79–88.
22.
LangeC., DeMeoD., SilvermanE.K. (2004) PBAT: Tools for family-based association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 74, 367–369.
