Peering over the Shoulders of Giants?

Ofcom (2014) The communications market report. Ofcom.

White D. , and Le Cornu A. (2011) Visitors and residents: a new typology for online engagement. 5 September, First Monday, Vol. 16, p. 1.

Holliman R. (2011) Advocacy in the tail: Exploring the implications of ‘climategate’ for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism: Theo. Prac. Crit., 12, 832.

Burns T. , O'Connor D. , and Stocklmayer S. (2003) Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public Underst. Sci., 12, 183.

Bauer M. , Allum N. , and Miller S. (2007) What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Underst. Sci., 16, 79.

Hamilton J. Faraday: the life. Harper Collins, London: 2003.

Nielsen J. (2006) Participation Inequality: Encouraging More Users to Contribute. [Online]. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html.

Doing science in the open. Nielsen M. 2009, Phys. World, 22, 30.

Stafford N. (2010) Science in the digital age. Nature, 467, p. S21.

Research Information Network. If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use Web 2.0. Research Information Network: Communicating and disseminating research. [Online] July 2010 www.rin.ac.uk/web-20-researchers.

De Roure D. (2008) myExperiment: Defining the Social Virtual Research Environment. Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 2008. 4th IEEE Int. Conf. e-Science. pp. 182–189.

McCallie E. (2009) Many Experts, Many Audiences: Public Engagement with Science and Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report, Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington DC.

Grand A. (2012) Open science and public engagement: exploring the potential of the open paradigm to support public engagement with science, PhD thesis. University of the West of England, Bristol.

Grand A. (2014) Mapping the hinterland: data issues in open science. Public Underst. Sci., 25 April.