Abstract
Recently the first case of sectioning the nerves to the choledochoduodenal junction in a patient was reported. 1 The reasons for believing that this procedure would not prove effective in relaxing the human sphincter of Oddi have already been set forth. 2 To test this more thoroughly, selection has been made of a laboratory animal in which inhibitory reflexes from the gut tract to the gall bladder have already been demonstrated 3 and in which the detailed distribution of nerves to the choledocho-duodenal junction has been worked out 4 —namely the cat.
At laparotomy, the following procedures were carried out upon approximately 30 cats: (1) various autonomic nerves in the abdomen were severed (or doubly ligated); (2) insulated electrodes were sewed to the caecum by a flap of the rubber tube through which the enamelled wires were brought to the laparotomy wound; (3) the gall bladder was filled with lipiodol (Whitaker method). Some 15 hours later, by which time the animals had fully recovered, the latter were fed a mixture of egg yolk and milk by tube and then x-rayed at appropriate intervals with the object of ascertaining the rate of emptying of the gall bladder and the presence of inhibitory reflexes emanating from faradically induced contraction of the caecum.
Severance of the gastroduodenal nerve and plexus—specific nerves in the lesser omentum leading to the choledocho-duodenal junction—resulted, in 8 animals, in retarding the evacuation of lipiodol. (The studies of DuBois and Hunt 5 were used as controls); and interruption of these nerves did not abolish the inhibitory reflex from the caecum to the gall bladder. These experiments, therefore, fail to support the view that such operations in man would relieve a spasm of the sphincter.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
