Abstract
The cause of rickets in breast-fed babies has not been satisfactorily explained. It is not due to deficient phosphorus or calcium in the milk, as Von Meysenburg, 1 Von Meysenburg and DeBuys 2 have shown that the milk consumed by rachitic infants is no lower in its phosphorus or calcium than that received by normal infants. Courtney, 3 making a similar finding as regards K and Ca, points out that the diets of the mothers were deficient in fresh fruits, vegetables, and milk.
Contrary to the finding of Lesné and Vagliano 4 that breast milk does not have anti-rachitic properties we have found that it may be strongly anti-rachitic. While we can not state definitely that the anti-rachitic factor is present in breast milk only, as it is present in the food of the mother, we have found that a diet containing an ample supply of green vegetables, fruits, eggs, and milk, in addition to a small daily dosage of cod-liver oil, the fat of breast milk is markedly anti-rachitic.
The milk fat used was obtained from two sources; one a composite fat from the milk of three mothers on the same diet and one a fat from the milk of one mother. The first sample was fed at a level of 15 to 20 per cent of the food intake to three rats with severe rickets. One of the rats refused the fat, the other two took it for three days and on autopsy showed good line tests 5 The second sample was fed to six rachitic rats at levels ranging from 5 to 25 per cent of the food intake. It was found that a fat level of at least 8 per cent was needed to produce a distinct line test.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
