Abstract
The actual role played by insulin in the pathogenesis of hypertension remains obscure. Definitive evidence of a causal role for insulin in initiating or maintaining essential hypertension in humans is lacking. Circumstantial evidence, on the other hand, abounds. In this Point/Counterpoint review, two authorities working in the field present their view of this relationship. Professor Hall and his colleagues have argued persuasively that experimental evidence, much of it from their own laboratories, does not support a role for insulin. Much of this experimental work, however, depends upon studies performed in the dog, and its relevance to human hypertension remains, therefore, problematic. Inferences drawn from patients with insulinoma (who lack hypertension) may be overstated since in insulinoma elevated insulin levels consist, at least in part, of proinsulin, and blood glucose levels tend to be low, rather than slightly elevated as they are in insulin-resistant subjects without insulinoma. If both insulin and glucose are involved in the prohypertensive process, this lower level of glucose might be an important distinguishing feature between patients with insulinoma and insulin resistant subjects with hypertension.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
