Abstract
It has been pointed out previously by the author and others that the contraction process of the muscles of cold-blooded animals in the course of fatigue becomes greatly slowed, while those of warm-blooded animals show no such phenomenon. Lohmann has recently claimed that a cold-blooded muscle on being heated to a mammalian temperature shows a course of fatigue similar to that of mammalian muscle, and on the other hand, that a warmblooded muscle on being cooled, fatigues like the muscles of coldblooded animals at a similar temperature. From the supposed effects he concludes that in the matter of fatigue there is no real physiological difference between the two groups of muscle.
The author has investigated the question by very careful methods in a considerable variety of animals, and has not been able to confirm Lohmann's conclusions. The muscles of the frog and the turtle show their characteristic method of fatigue whatever the temperature. The muscles of warm-blooded animals on being cooled and then fatigued, show either no slowing of the contraction process or only a slight slowing. The latter seems to be most pronounced in the rodents, namely, the rabbit, the mouse and the rat. [See page 37 (101).]
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
