Through a close study of blogs, where male fitness experts share their expertise, this article analyses how masculinity are framed within the Internet-mediated context of the fitness culture. This is done against the background of Connell's theory of masculinity, and recent critiques of the concept of hegemony. Through an in-depth analysis of three blogs, we get a complex and contradictory image of the different forms of masculinity portrayed in these blogs and in fitness culture at large. The texts and imagery on the blogs clearly exceeds the criteria/limits of traits and norms traditionally considered male or female. In doing so, the may contribute to an increased acceptance for, for example, gay identities and other submissive masculinities.
ConnellR.W. (2000). The men and the boys. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
10.
CrossleyN. (2006). In the gym: Motives, meaning and moral careers. Body & Society, 12, 23–50.
11.
DenhamB.E. (2008). Masculinities in hardcore bodybuilding. Men and Masculinities, 11, 234–242.
12.
DonaldsonM. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity?Theory and Society, 22, 643–657.
13.
FleischmannA. (2004). Narratives published on the Internet by parents of children with autism: What do they reveal and why is it important?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 35–43.
14.
FracherJ., & KimmelM. (1995). Hard issues and soft spots: Counselling men about sexuality. In KimmelM. & MessnerM. (Eds.), Men's lives (pp. 455–465). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
HallM.GoughB., & Seymour-SmithS. (2012). “I'm METRO, NOT Gay!” A discursive analysis of men's accounts of makeup use on YouTube. The Journal of Men's Studies, 3, 209–226.
17.
HooleyT.MarriottJ., & WellensJ. (2012). What is online research?New York, NY: Blooms-bury.
18.
GrodzinskyF., & TavaniH. (2010). Applying the “Contextual Integrity” Model of Privacy to Personal Blogs in the Blogosphere. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3, 38–47.
19.
HearnJ. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5, 49–72.
IHRSA. (2011). The 2011 IHRSA Global Report. The state of the Health Club Industry. Boston, MA: IHRSA.
22.
JohanssonT., & HammarénN. (2012) “Imagine, just 16 years old and already a dad!” The construction of young fatherhood on the Internet. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. doi:10.1080/02673843.2012.747972.
23.
JohanssonT. (2003). What's behind the Mask? Bodybuilding and masculinity. In ErvöS., & JohanssonT. (Eds.). Bending Bodies. Moulding Masculinities, Volume 2 (pp. 92–106). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
24.
JohanssonT. (1998) Den skulpterade kroppen. Gymkultur, friskvård och estetik [The Sculptured body: Gym culture, health and aesthetics]. Stockholm, Sweden: Carlssons förlag.
25.
JohanssonT. (1996). Gendered spaces. The gym culture and the construction of gender. Young, 4, 32–47.
26.
JoinsonA.McKennaK., & PostmesT. (2007). Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford, England: Oxford university press.
27.
KimmelM. (1997). Manhood in America. A cultural history. New York, NY: The Free Press.
28.
KleinA.M. (1993). Little big men. Bodybuilding subculture and gender construction. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
LabergeS., & AlbertM. (2000). Conceptions of masculinity and gender transgressions in sport among adolescent boys. Hegemony, contestation, and the social class dynamic. In McKayJ.MessnerM. & SaboD. (Eds.), Masculinities, gender relations and sport. Research on men and masculinities (pp. 195–221). London, England: Sage Publications.
31.
LeedsM.C., & LibertiR. (2007). “Cause that's what girls do”: The making of a feminized gym. Gender & Society, 21, 676–699.
32.
MalcolmN. (2003). Constructing female athleticism. A study of girls' recreational softball. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 1387–1404.
33.
MarkulaP. (2001). Beyond the perfect body. Women's body image distortion in fitness magazine discourse. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 25, 158–179.
34.
MessnerM. (1992). Power at play. Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston, MA: Bea-con Press.
35.
MosseG. (1996). The image of man. The creation of modern masculinity. New York, NY/Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36.
NixonS. (1996). Hard looks. Masculinity, spectatorship and contemporary consumption. London, England: UCL Press.
37.
OrgadS. (2006). The cultural dimension of online communication: A study of breast cancer patient's internet spaces. New Media & Society, 8(2), 877–899.
38.
ProngerB. (1990). The arena of masculinity. Sports, homosexuality, and the meaning of sex. New York, NY: St. Martin's.
39.
ReichJ. (2010). The world's most perfectly developed man. Charles Atlas, physical culture, and the inscription of American masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 12, 444–461.
40.
RohlingerD.A. (2002). Eroticizing men. Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles, 46, 61–74.
41.
RosenbergA. (2010). Virtual world research ethics and the private/public distinction. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3, 23–37.
42.
SassatelliR. (1999). Interaction order and beyond: A field of analysis of body culture within fitness gym. Body & Society, 5, 227–248.
43.
SassatelliR. (2010). Fitness culture. Gyms and the commercialisation of discipline and fun. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
SheehanK.B. (2010). Online research methodology: Reflections and speculations. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3, 56–61.
45.
MaguireSmith J. (2002). Body lessons. Fitness publishing and cultural production of the fitness consumer. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 37, 449–464.
46.
MaguireSmith J. (2008). Fit for consumption. Sociology and the business of fitness. London, England/New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
WienkeC. (1998). Negotiating the male body: Men, masculinity, and cultural ideals. The Journal of Men's Studies, 6, 255–282.
48.
WedgewoodN. (2009). Connell's theory of masculinity. Its origin and influences in the study of gender. Journal of Gender Studies, 18, 329–339.
49.
WendelWolf L.TomaD., & MorphewC. (2001). How much difference is too much difference? Perceptions of gay men and lesbians in intercollegiate athletics. Journal of College Student Development, 42, 465–479.
