The stereotype that men are less nurturing than women frequently leads people to evaluate men less favorably than they evaluate equivalent women in situations that require nurturance and care. Nevertheless, theories of expectancy-violation suggest that such stereotypes may lead people to evaluate men who are unambiguously nurturing in such situations more positively than they evaluate equivalent women. Consistent with predictions, participants evaluated a hypothetical male professor who was described as “particularly nurturing” more favorably than they evaluated an equivalent female professor. This finding suggests that negative stereotypes do not always lead to less favorable evaluations; rather, negative stereotypes that are violated by unambiguous information can lead to more favorable evaluations through contrast effects.
AbelM.H., & MeltzerA.L. (2007). Student ratings of a male and female professors' lecture on sex discrimination in the workforce. Sex Roles, 57, 173–180.
2.
AmbertA.-M. (1982). Differences in children's behavior toward custodial mothers and custodial fathers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 73–86.
3.
BemS.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
4.
BennettS.K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 170–179.
5.
BiernatM. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019–1027.
6.
BoulwareD.W., & HolmesD.S. (1970). Preferences for therapists and related expectancies. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 35, 269–277.
7.
BrovermanI.K.VogelS.R.BrovermanD.M.ClarksonF.E., & RosenkrantzP.S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.
8.
BryanL.R.ColemanM.GanongL.H., & BryanS.H. (1986). Person perception: Family structure as a cue for stereotyping. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 169–174.
9.
BurgoonJ.K. (1986, February). Expectancy violations: Theory, research, and critique. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association.
10.
DiekmanA.B., & EaglyA.H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.
11.
EaglyA.H., & CrowleyM. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308.
12.
GrahamT., & IckesW. (1997). When women's intuition isn't greater than men's. In IckesW. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 117–143). New York: Guilford.
13.
HerrP.M.ShermanS.J., & FazioR.H. (1993). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323–340.
14.
JussimL.ColemanL.M., & LerchL. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536–546.
15.
KahnemanD., & MillerD.T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.
16.
KerssensJ.J.BensingJ.M., & AndelaM.G. (1997). Patient preference for genders of health professionals. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 1531–1540.
17.
KundaZ., & ThagardP. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallell-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284–308.
18.
LutharH.K. (1996). Gender differences in evaluation of performance and leadership ability: Autocratic vs. democratic managers. Sex Roles, 35, 337–361.
19.
MillerD.T., & TurnbullW. (1986). Expectancies and interpersonal processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 233–256.
20.
SekaquaptewaD., & EspinozaP. (2004). Biased processing of stereotype-incongruency is greater for low than high status group targets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 128–135.
21.
SpragueJ., & MassoniK. (2005). Student evaluations and gendered expectations: What we can't count can hurt us. Sex Roles, 53, 779–793.
22.
TaynorJ., & DeauxK. (1973). When women are more deserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 360–367.
23.
WilliamsC.L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–267.
