Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2011-1
“Being in a Room with Like-Minded Men”: An Exploratory Study of Men's Participation in a Bystander Intervention Program to Prevent Intimate Partner Violence
The bystander approach suggests that individuals can intervene to interrupt situations leading to violence and has previously been used in sexual assault prevention. This article applies the bystander approach to interpersonal violence. An exploratory study was conducted to assess a workshop designed to prevent intimate partner violence that utilized the bystander approach with male participants. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to measure male participants' attitudes regarding bystander intervention behaviors and attitudes after participating in a workshop designed to encourage bystander intervention behaviors. A total of 41 men completed posttest surveys, and eight participated in face-to-face interviews. Important findings indicate that many participants expressed anxiety in social situations that inhibited bystander behavior and that many men desired more opportunities to talk in open forums such as the workshops with other like-minded men.
BanyardV.L.MoynihanM.M., & CrossmanM.T. (2009). Reducing sexual violence on campus: The role of student leaders as empowered bystanders. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 446–457.
2.
BanyardV.L.MoynihanM.M., & PlanteE.G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481.
3.
BanyrdV.L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 83–97.
4.
BerkowtizA.D. (2005). An overview of the social norms approach. In LedermanL.C. & StewartL.P. (Eds.), Changing the culture of college drinking (pp. 193–214). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
5.
BonomiA.E.ThompsonR.S.AndersonM.ReidR.J.CarrellD.DimerJ.A. (2006). Intimate partner violence and women's physical, mental, and social functioning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(6), 458–466.
6.
BurnS. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779–792.
7.
CarlsonM. (2008). I'd rather go along and be considered a man: Masculinity and bystander intervention. The Journal of Men's Studies, 16(1), 3–17.
8.
CaseyE. (January, 2011). Engaging men as anti-violence allies. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference for the Society for Social Work and Research, San Francisco, CA.
9.
CokerA.L.DavisL.E.AriasI.DesaiS.SandersonM.BrandtH.M. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 23(4), 260–268.
10.
ConnellR.W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11.
FabianoP.PerkinsH.W.BerkowitzA.LinkenbachJ., & StarkC. (2004). Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: Evidence for a social norms approach. Journal of American College Health, 52(3), 105–112.
12.
FischerP.GreitemeyerT.PollozekF., & FreyD. (2006). The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies?European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 267–278.
13.
FoubertJ.D. (2000). The longitudinal effects of a rape-prevention program on fraternity members' attitudes, behavioral intent, and behavior. Journal of American College Health, 48(4), 158–163.
14.
FoubertJ.D., & CowellE.A. (2004). Perceptions of a rape prevention program by fraternity men and male athletes: Powerful effects and implications for changing behavior. NASPA, 42(1), 1–20.
15.
FoubertJ.D., & La VoyS.A. (2000). A qualitative assessment of “The Men's Program:” The impact of a rape prevention program on fraternity men. NASPA, 30(1), 18–30.
16.
FoubertJ.D., & NewberryJ.T. (2006). Effects of two versions of an empathy-based rape prevention program on fraternity men's survivor empathy, attitudes, and behavioral intent to commit rape or sexual assault. Journal of College Student Development, 47(2), 133–148.
17.
FoubertJ.D., & PerryB.C. (2007). Creating lasting attitude and behavior changes in fraternity members and male student athletes. Violence against Women, 13(1), 70–86.
18.
HainesM.P.PerkinsH.W.RiceR.M., & BarkerG. (2005). A guide to marketing social norms for health promotion in schools and communities. National Social Norms Resource Center. Retrieved from the National Social Norms Resource Center: http://www.socialnormsre-sources.org/pdf/Guidebook2.pdf
19.
HughesM.J. & JonesL. (2000). Women, violence, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Research Report. California State University and the California Governor's Office of Research and Planning. Retrieved from http://www.csus.edu/calst/Government_Affairs/Reports/ffp32.pdf
20.
JonesL.HughesM.UnterstallerU. (2001). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in victims of domestic violence: A review of the research. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 2(2), 99–119.
21.
KatzJ. (1994). Reconstructing masculinity in the locker room: The Mentors in Violence Prevention Project. Harvard Educational Review, 65(2), 163–175.
22.
KatzJ. (2006). The macho paradox. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
23.
LataneB., & DarleyJ.M. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383.
24.
LevineM. (1999). Rethinking bystander nonintervention: Social categorization and the evidence of witnesses at the James Bulger murder trials. Human Relations, 52(9), 1133–1155.
25.
McMahonS., & FarmerG.L. (in press). Measuring subtle rape myths: An updated version of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Social Work Research.
26.
McMahonS.PostmusJ.L., & KoenickR.A. (2011). Conceptualizing the engaging bystander approach to sexual violence prevention on college campuses. Journal of College Student Development, 52(1), 115–130.
27.
McMahonS.PostmusJ.L.WarrenerC. & KoenickR.A. (under review). The impact of a peer education theater intervention on rape myth attitudes and bystander behavior.
MertensD.M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
MoynihanM.M., & BanyardV.L. (2008). Community responsibility for preventing sexual violence: A pilot with campus Greeks and intercollegiate athletes. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 36, 23–38.
31.
NeighborsC.WalkerD.D.MbilinyiL.F.O'RourkeA.EdelsonJ.ZegreeJ. (2011). Normative misperceptions of abuse among perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence. Violence Against Women, 16(4), 370–386.
32.
New Brunswick Domestic Violence Awareness Coalition, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Community Health Promotion Program, The Rutgers Community Health Foundation. (2008). 100+ men against domestic violence. Brochure.
33.
PattonM.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
PerkinsH.W. (2003). The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
The White Ribbon Campaign: Men working to end men's violence against women. (2011, March 5). Retrieved from http://www.whiteribbon.ca
37.
TjadenP., & ThoennesN. (2000). Full report of prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women. Publication No. NCJ 181867. Available from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/181867.htm
38.
WantlandR. (2008). Our brotherhood and your sister: Building anti-rape community in the fraternity. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 36(1/2), 57–73.
39.
WardK.J. (2001). Mentors in violence prevention program evaluation 1999–2000. Unpublished report, Northeastern University. Boston, MA.
