This paper examines Connell's social theory of gender in two secondary schools. Using statistical models for social networks, relations of power, violence, liking and disliking are investigated with regard to students' male dominance attitudes. While one school demonstrates support for local-level hypotheses articulated for Connell's theory, and thus for the conception of hegemonic masculinity as sitting atop a hierarchy of masculinities, another school does not. However, support for the more fundamental notion that gender is relational is found within both contexts. This research represents the first assessment of Connell's theory in local contexts using a quantitative relational methodology. That hypothesised effects are found, even after controlling for many other explanatory factors, demonstrates impressive empirical support for Connell's theory.
AbbottA. (1997). Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces, 75(4), 1149–1182.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2001a). Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia (Census No. 2033.2.30.001). ABS.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2001b). Information Paper — Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia (Census No. 2033.2.30.001). ABS.
4.
CarriganT.ConnellR.W., & LeeJ. (1985). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14(5), 551–604.
5.
ConnellR.W. (1995). Masculinities. St. Leonards, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.
ContractorN.S.WassermanS., & FaustK. (2006). Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. The Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681–703.
8.
DaviesB. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
9.
DemetriouD.Z. (2001). Connell's concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory and Society, 30(3), 337–361.
10.
DiMaggioP. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.
11.
EspelageD.L.HoltM.K., & HenkelR.R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74(1), 205–220.
12.
FroshS.PhoenixA., & PattmanR. (2001). Young masculinities: Understanding boys in contemporary society. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
13.
HalpernC.T.UdryJ.R.CampbellB., & SuchindranC. (1993). Relationships between aggression and pubertal increases in testosterone—a panel analysis of adolescent males. Social Biology, 40(1–2), 8–24.
JonesF.L., & McMillanJ. (2001). Scoring occupational categories for social research: A review of current practice, with Australian examples. Work, Employment & Society, 15(3), 539–563.
17.
KenwayJ., & FitzclarenceL. (1997). Masculinity, violence and schooling: Challenging ‘poisonous pedegogies’. Gender and Education, 9(1), 117–133.
18.
KimmelM.S., & MahlerM. (2003). Adolescent masculinity, homophobia, and violence: Random school shootings, 1982–2001. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(10), 1439–1458.
19.
KozorovitskiyY., & GouldE. (2004). Dominance hierarchy influences adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(30), 6755–6759.
20.
LubbersM.J., & SnijdersT.A.B. (2007). A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: A reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Social Networks, 29, 489–507.
21.
LusherD. (2008). Masculinities in local contexts: Structural, individual and cultural interdependencies. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
22.
LusherD., & RobinsG. (2009). Hegemonic and other masculinities in local social contexts. Men & Masculinities, 11(4), 387–423.
23.
Mac an GhaillM. (1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.
24.
MazurA., & BoothA. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(3), 353–397.
25.
PattisonP., & WassermanS. (1999). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 52, 169–193.
26.
PoyntingS., & DonaldsonM. (2005). Snakes and leaders: Hegemonic masculinity in ruling-class boys' boarding schools. Men and Masculinities, 7(4), 325–346.
27.
RobinsG.ElliottP., & PattisonP. (2001). Network models for social selection processes. Social Networks, 23(1), 1–30.
28.
RobinsG., & PattisonP. (2005). Interdependencies and social processes: Generalized dependence structures. In CarringtonP.J.ScottJ., & WassermanS. (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 192–214). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
RobinsG.PattisonP., & ElliottP. (2001). Network models for social influence processes. Psychometrika, 66(2), 161–189.
30.
RobinsG.PattisonP.KalishY., & LusherD. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173–191.
31.
SalmivalliC.HuttunenA., & LagerspetzK.M.J. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 305–312.
32.
SidaniusJ., & PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
SmithP.K., & BrainP. (2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behavior, 26(1), 1–9.
34.
SnijdersT. A. B.PattisonP.RobinsG., & HandcockM. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 55, 99–153.
35.
SpeerS.A. (2001). Reconsidering the concept of hegemonic masculinity: Discursive psychology, conversation analysis and participants' orientations. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1), 107–135.
36.
TurnerJ.C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–22.
37.
WangP.RobinsG., & PattisonP. (2005). PNet: A program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. University of Melbourne.
38.
WassermanS., & FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
WassermanS., & PattisonP. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks 1. An introduction to Markov graphs and p. Psychometrika, 61(3), 401–425.
