This article reports the results of the initial evaluation of the revised version of the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI-R). The MRNI-R assesses only traditional male role norms (thus dropping the Non-Traditional Attitudes subscale of the original MRNI), revises the labeling and content of the Self-Reliance subscale, drops the Achievement/Status subscale and substitutes the Dominance subscale, and updates the language throughout the instrument. The MRNI-R was administered to 170 undergraduate and graduate students (38 men and 132 women). One hundred and seven initial items were reduced to fifty-three items following iterative analyses of item-to-subscale correlations. Improved reliabilities were found for the MRNI-R and its subscales, with Cronbach alphas ranging from .73 to .96. Significant sex and racial/ethnic differences were found with respect to the endorsement of traditional masculinity ideology, providing support for its construct validity.
BohanJ. S. (1997). Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism, and feminist psychology. In GergenM. & DavisS. N. (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 31–47). New York: Routledge.
2.
BrannonR., & JuniS. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes about masculinity. Psychological Documents, 14(1). (University Microfilms No. 2612).
3.
ChuaP., & FujinoD. C. (1999). Negotiating new Asian-American masculinities: Attitudes and gender expectations. The Journal of Men's Studies, 7, 391–413.
4.
ConnellR. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
5.
DavidD., & BrannonR. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint for manhood, and what it's done for us lately. In DavidD. & BrannonR. (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
DavisF. (1987). Antecedents and consequents of gender role conflict: An empirical test of sex role strain analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(11), 3443.
7.
EislerR. M., & SkidmoreJ. R. (1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification, 11, 123–136.
8.
GoodG. E., & MintzL. B. (1990). Gender role conflict and depression in college men: Evidence for compounded risk. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 17–21.
9.
JakupcakM.LisakD., & RoemerL. (2002). The role of masculine ideology and masculine gender role stress in men's perpetration of relationship violence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3, 97–106.
10.
LazurR. F., & MajorsR. (1995). Men of color: Ethnocultural variations of male gender role strain. In LevantR. & PollackW. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books Inc.
11.
LevantR. (1996). The new psychology of men. Professional Psychology, 27, 259–265.
12.
LevantR. F.CuthbertA. C.RichmondK.SellersA.MatveevA.MatinaO. (2003). Masculinity ideology among Russian and U.S. young men and women and its relationship to unhealthy lifestyle habits among young Russian men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 26–36.
13.
LevantR. F., & FischerJ. (1998). The Male Role Norms Inventory. In DavisC. M.YarberW. H.BausermanR.SchreerG. & DavisS. L. (Eds.), Sexuality-related measures: A compendium (2nd. ed., pp. 469–472). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
LevantR. F.HirschL.CelentanoE.CozzaT.HillS.MacEachernM. (1992). The male role: An investigation of norms and stereotypes. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 325–337.
15.
LevantR., & MajorsR. (1997). An investigation into variations in the construction of the male gender role among young Asian American and European American women and men. Journal of Gender, Culture and Health, 2, 33–43.
16.
LevantR.MajorsR., & KelleyM. (1998). Masculinity ideology among young Asian American and European American women and men in different regions of the United States. Cultural Diversity and Mental Health, 4, 227–236.
17.
LevantR. F., & RichmondK. (in press). A review of research on masculinity ideologies using the Male Role Norms Inventory. The Journal of Men's Studies, 15(2).
18.
LevantR. F.RichmondK.MajorsR. G.InclanJ. E.RosselloJ. M.Heesacker (2003). A multicultural investigation of masculinity ideology and alex-ithymia. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 91–99.
19.
LevantR. F.WuR., & FischerJ. (1996). Masculinity ideology: A comparison between U. S. and Chinese young men and women. Journal of Gender, Culture, and Health, 1, 217–220.
20.
LiuW. (2002). Exploring the lives of Asian American men: Racial identity, male role norms, gender role conflict, and prejudicial attitudes. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3, 107–118.
21.
MajorsR. G., & BillsonJ. M. (1992). Cool pose: The dilemmas of Black manhood in America. New York: Lexington Books.
22.
MaxtonR. A. (1994). How do men in mid-life conceptualize masculinity, and how do these conceptualizations relate to intimacy? (Doctoral Dissertation, Boston University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, B4432.
23.
O'NeilJ. M.GoodG. E., & HolmesS. (1995). Fifteen years of theory and research on men's gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research. In LevantR. F. & PollackW. S. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 164–206). New York: Basic Books.
24.
PleckJ. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
PleckJ. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In LevantR. F. & PollackW. S. (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.
26.
PleckJ. H.SonensteinF. L., & KuL. C. (1994). Attitudes toward male roles: A discriminate validity analysis. Sex Roles, 30, 481–501.
27.
RichmondK., & LevantR. (2003). Clinical application of the gender role strain paradigm: Group treatment for adolescent boys. Journal of Clinical Psychology/In Session, 59(11), 1–9.
28.
SharpeM. J., & HeppnerP. P. (1991). Gender role, gender-role conflict, and psychological well-being in men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 323–330.
29.
SpenceJ. T., & HelmreichR. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
30.
ThompsonE. H., & PleckJ. H. (1986). The structure of male norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.
31.
WangA. (2000). Asian and white boys' competing discourses about masculinity: Implications for secondary education. Canadian Journal of Education, 25, 113–125.
32.
WuR.LevantR. F., & SellersA. (2001) The influence of sex and social development on masculinity ideology of Chinese undergraduate students. Psychological Science (published by the Chinese Psychological Society, 24, 365–366).
