Punch-Drunk Love exposes the complexity and kitsch superficialities of masculine gender constructions. Written and directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, this film deconstructs masculine gender performance without pretending to offer overly simplistic alternatives. The following is an exploratory essay that asks what kind of masculinity Punch-Drunk Love represents. If it is true that men no longer hold the patriarchal sway on a domestic level, then how is masculine gender constructed? In order to elucidate the relationship between the film and postpatriarchal masculinity, we will need to explicate an approach to gender and masculinity in general. Having explored postpatriarchy, we can then begin to address what this contemporary film tells us about the possibility of a punch-drunk masculinity.
AndersonP.T. (2002). Punch-Drunk Love (1st Ed.). New York: Newmarket Press.
2.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
3.
De LauretisT. (1987). Technologies of gender: Essays on theory, film, and fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
4.
DenchG. (1996). Transforming men: Changing patterns of dependency and dominance in gender relations. London: Transaction.
5.
EhrenreichB. (1995). The decline of patriarchy. In BergerM.WallisB.WatsonS., & WeemsC.M. (Eds.), Constructing masculinity (pp. 284–290). New York: Routledge.
6.
HarrisI.M. (1995). Messages men hear: Constructing masculinities. London: Taylor & Francis.
StantonD. (Writer). (2003). Punch-Drunk Love DVD cover [DVD]: Columbia Tristar Home Entertainment.
13.
TuranK. (2002, October 11). Isn't it daringly, absurdly romantic?; Punch-Drunk Love mines real emotion on the extreme edges of the genre. Los Angeles Times, F.1.
YudiceG. (1995). What's a straight white man to do? In BergerM.WallisB.WatsonS., & WeemsC.M. (Eds.), Constructing masculinity (pp. 267–283). New York: Routledge.
